Oct 29, 2019, 1:23 PM MASCULINE/K .. Fascists (Ethno National – Secular Theologians) .. .. Pagans (Ethno-Nationalists) .. .. .. Social Conservatives (reasonable, normativists) .. .. .. .. Right Libertarians (jeffersonian constitutionalists) .. .. .. .. .. Civic Nationalist (Centrists) .. .. .. .. .. .. Democratic Egalitarians (centrists, insurance) .. .. .. .. .. .. Christian Conservatives (Universalists)***** .. .. .. .. .. Left Progressives (socialists, redistributivists) .. .. .. .. Left Liberals (ant-masculine, destructivists, postmodernists) .. .. .. Left Radicals (anti-western destructivists, antifa) .. .. Communists (economic destructivists) .. Conservative Jews, Islamists (cultural destructivists) FEMININE/R DYSGENIC Note the location of Christians. Christians have traditionally been leftists. And until the Marxist, postmodern, feminist attack on christianity in an effort to create a religion of the state, the christians were absolutely positively anti-aristocratic, ant-commercial, and only pro family, pro theology.
Theme: Religion
-
Note Where Christians Sit in This Political Triangle
Oct 29, 2019, 1:23 PM MASCULINE/K .. Fascists (Ethno National – Secular Theologians) .. .. Pagans (Ethno-Nationalists) .. .. .. Social Conservatives (reasonable, normativists) .. .. .. .. Right Libertarians (jeffersonian constitutionalists) .. .. .. .. .. Civic Nationalist (Centrists) .. .. .. .. .. .. Democratic Egalitarians (centrists, insurance) .. .. .. .. .. .. Christian Conservatives (Universalists)***** .. .. .. .. .. Left Progressives (socialists, redistributivists) .. .. .. .. Left Liberals (ant-masculine, destructivists, postmodernists) .. .. .. Left Radicals (anti-western destructivists, antifa) .. .. Communists (economic destructivists) .. Conservative Jews, Islamists (cultural destructivists) FEMININE/R DYSGENIC Note the location of Christians. Christians have traditionally been leftists. And until the Marxist, postmodern, feminist attack on christianity in an effort to create a religion of the state, the christians were absolutely positively anti-aristocratic, ant-commercial, and only pro family, pro theology.
-
You Don’t Get It Do You? (restoring Religion)
You Don’t Get It Do You? (restoring Religion) https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/you-dont-get-it-do-you-restoring-religion/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:42:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265669758906744832
-
You Don’t Get It Do You? (restoring Religion)
Oct 29, 2019, 4:53 PM (Luke does) If we can find a way to unite the secular, rational, traditional, and feminine theological christian, and masculine mythological pagan under natural law, heroic virtues, and christian ethics, we can restore the church(es) to the central position in our civilization and restore the civil society, with common everything except grammar of expression.
-
You Don’t Get It Do You? (restoring Religion)
Oct 29, 2019, 4:53 PM (Luke does) If we can find a way to unite the secular, rational, traditional, and feminine theological christian, and masculine mythological pagan under natural law, heroic virtues, and christian ethics, we can restore the church(es) to the central position in our civilization and restore the civil society, with common everything except grammar of expression.
-
The Effect of Gods Discounts the Necessity of The Existence of Gods
The Effect of Gods Discounts the Necessity of The Existence of Gods https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/the-effect-of-gods-discounts-the-necessity-of-the-existence-of-gods/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:40:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265669312871874561
-
The Effect of Gods Discounts the Necessity of The Existence of Gods
Oct 29, 2019, 7:26 PM Gods don’t exist. Addicts do defend their suppliers tho. ;)-CD
—“The effect of Gods discounts the necessity of the existence of gods.”—Jim Snyder
^The correct answer.
-
The Effect of Gods Discounts the Necessity of The Existence of Gods
Oct 29, 2019, 7:26 PM Gods don’t exist. Addicts do defend their suppliers tho. ;)-CD
—“The effect of Gods discounts the necessity of the existence of gods.”—Jim Snyder
^The correct answer.
-
Because P Is Compatible with Christianity, and Will Preserve Christianity
Because P Is Compatible with Christianity, and Will Preserve Christianity https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/because-p-is-compatible-with-christianity-and-will-preserve-christianity/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:37:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265668372026601474
-
Because P Is Compatible with Christianity, and Will Preserve Christianity
Oct 29, 2019, 8:14 PM P-Law is not ‘superior’ to Christian Faith – we have no say over such things. P-Law is compatible with Christian ethics and morality, and superior in the material – science, economics, law, politics and war, and likewise christianity is compatible with P-law, and is outside of the material – science, economics, law, politics, and war. YOU HAVE IT BACKWARDS A Christian does not profess P. A christian professes Christianity, and assists the implementation of a P-constitution, Because p is compatible with christianity, and will preserve Christianity in theological, philosophical, traditional, rational, and scientific terms. If christians want a theological monopoly they can wait until the islamists eradicate the rest of them – and carry the blame for letting it happen.