( I will need to do a year in review soon. It’s been a big year. circumpolar civilization, genetic pacification, race as difference in rates of reproduction, religion, refining market government, rediscovering the oath – much more than a contract – the basis of our way of life, and refining the seven warranties. As well as beginning to think through how to teach propertarian reasoning just as we teach programming – as an act of writing. )
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 08:06:00 UTC
Lies, lies and more lies. He follows his creed: white liberation theology.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 20:25:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673599051238154244
Reply addressees: @politico
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673597678610227200
IN REPLY TO:
@politico
Obama to use Oval to calm nation’s fears https://t.co/NfWAtkbe0Z | AP Photo https://t.co/ihwqkHYQlZ
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673597678610227200
RELIGION
Yep. Its not going to take me as long as I thought. Just a few more months I think.
I knew the organizational structure and the incentives. I just had to solve the content and justification problem.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 04:19:00 UTC
ANTI-CHRISTIAN IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE
—“Today, in the USA, the only Christians that are targeted for criticism are the White Christians. The attacks on Christianity are not really about religion; they are about race. The racist subtext of anti-Christian rhetoric is palpable and just as often it is explicit rather than implicit. Black Christians in contrast are not criticized; they are even praised for their roll in “civil rights” causes.”—Glen Runciter
In other words, they circumvent the racist accusation by criticizing christians. But it’s still a racist argument.
On the other hand, a large number of the critics are single and unattractive white women who have been sold ‘the second great lie’.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 03:56:00 UTC
A friend just turned me onto some work about the talmud as polylogical/polyethical meaning keeping “Two Sets Of Books”.
I’ll try to read through it quickly. My concern is again not to criticize successful tactics, but to understand how to defeat this amazing technique that worked in both religious and pseudoscientific eras.
I have it down. But the more I understand, the better I will get at it.
We can demand due diligence of truthfulness by demand for warranty of due diligence:
1) Identity
2) Internal Consistency
3) External Correspondence
4) Existential Possibility
5) Morality
6) Full Accounting
7) Parsimony
These seven tests (so far) make it extremely difficult to lie. Almost impossible.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 16:10:00 UTC
FOLLOWUP TO: THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM’S LIES
—Dr. Dolittle, you’re an ignorant anti-semite!!—
Actually I’m not anti-anything, and I am probably the most knowledgeable person working today on the subject of Truth, and its consequences in Ethics, Morality, and Politics. Which I’m happy to demonstrate in any debate with anyone living at any time. And I probably know the very few people capable of debating me.
Either statements are true, statements are false or statements are undecidable. Either you can attack the arguments that I put forward or you cant. No name calling will alter the truth or falsity of the statements. All it demonstrates is that you’re either ignorant or dishonest.
The fact of the matter is that westerners discovered quite by accident, the technology of truth and it resulted in reason, science, medicine, technology and nearly all significant advancements made by mankind.
The fact of the matter is that for some reason, probably necessity, the hebrews created very useful means of deception of simple people who wished for the world to be other than it is. Their first great lie was scriptural monotheism. Their second great lies were pseudoscience.
The New England neo-puritans (my people, my ancestors, since my ancestors were norman and then puritans in the plymouth and new haven colonies,) evolved into the anti-slavery movement as a way of preparing the way for women’s suffrage. This is all well documented history. Sorry. The combination of the radical changes of the industrial revolution, the anglo, french, german, and jewish enlightenment failures, and the failure of western governments to successfully adapt rule of law and political processes that provide a means of constructing commons, could not adapt.
While a good number of our greatest minds understood that a problem was in progress they failed at solving it. Poincaré, Russell, Mises, Hayek, Popper, Bridgman, Brouwer, all failed to solve the problem of the social sciences. And because they failed, the 20th century will be remembered both as a rapid economic expansion, and (as Hayek warned it would be) a century of mysticism. Or, given their lack of understanding of the reason for the success of the discipline of science, ‘the century of pseudoscience.’.
These are just facts. Deal with reality. We don’t need more lies. We’ve destroyed western civilization with those lies.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 15:28:00 UTC
WE HAVE EACH OTHER, CHURCHES, HISTORY, AND THE BEAUTY OF NATURE. WHY DO WE NEED LIES?
Getting people together to listen to parables of history, feast, and sing is content-independent. It doesn’t matter WHAT people talk about. What matters are the existence of ‘safe’ civic rituals of ANY kind.
There is almost nothing of value in Christian history that is not in pagan history other than the extension of kinship love to non-kin in order to bridge family and tribal bonds. This improves economic rates of production and trust everywhere it has gone. Unfortunately we gave up worship of existential nature somewhat in order to worship a non-existent babylonian terrorist. Although in much of pagan Europe nature worship continued as the folk religion (just as they still exist in our fairy tales) even if the political religion was christianity, and the aristocratic ‘religion’ was the rough and unforgiving empiricism of warfare.
Furthermore, just as Chivalry gave dominant males access to status signals and self worth by acts of service, the priesthood and charity gave men and women access to status signals and self worth by acts of service.
The church took responsibility for insurance, education and family law. The state took responsibility for the construction of order (property), dispute resolution, economic production, and defense.
This division of labor maintained a balance between the clergy, the nobility, the burghers, the knights, and the free farmers, and the peasantry (illiterate working class so lazy and unproductive we cannot imagine it without watching men on third world street corners.
But none of this puts any value in the christian dogma. If anything the time of The First Great Lie has passed, and we are just now ending The Second Great Lie. Undoubtably there will be yet a third, but we will do what we can to prevent such a thing for as long as possible.
So to say we need ‘church’ with the central themes of virtue, family, love, charity, industry, and to remember our heroes and saints is to say the obvious. It would almost certainly be better to regularly remind people of the sacredness of nature, so that they would care for our commons.
But there is no meaningful reason why we must embrace mysticism in the ancient tradition, or pseudorationalism, or pseudoscience, in the current tradition (Cult of TED for example).
Nor do I understand, nor can anyone likely justify, the use of outright lying in city square, church pulpit, academic lectern, political podium, news desk, digital internet, radio microphone, motion video, or dramatic play. Why should archaic lies be distributed, and why should modern lies pseudorationalism and pseudoscience be distributed? There isn’t a reason other than we had no prior means of determining whether a due diligence of truthfulness had been performed.
We need a civic religion. We have one. It’s our history. And it’s a history that is very hard argue against. We likely need spiritualism to feel humility. We have one. It’s nature, our planet, the universe.
We have each other, we have our history and we have nature. They’re all truths.
Why do we need lies?
Cant you imagine a world without lies?
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 13:28:00 UTC
THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM’S LIES
(The Stoics Were Right: Jehova Is The Devil) (trigger warning) (ouch)
The Greeks tried and only partly succeeded in creating a discipline of truth telling.
The Hebrews succeeded in creating an training manual in deception, written using the very technique of deception that they wished to promote.
The first great deception was monotheism: Moses restatement of Ramses’ monotheism, and Abraham’s use of Babylonian absolutism.
The second great deception was pseudoscience: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, The Frankfurt School and Critique, Rothbard and Rand, Strauss’s neoconservatism, Chomsky.
These techniques of deception work by the same mechanism: half truth, desirable falsehood, suggestion appealing to altruism, and loading, framing, overloading, and propagandizing by heaping undue praise on the falsehood while heaping straw man criticisms on the truth.
It took others a few decades to identify the vulnerability. It took me a few years to understand the technique and find a means of exposing it to analytic criticism.
But now it’s pretty clear that the ancient battle between western science and middle eastern mysticism is merely the battle between the art of truth telling and the art of lying.
It is far more profitable to lie than speak the truth. Especially in a land where everyone speaks the truth.
If for no other reason than it is cheaper and faster to diligently construct desirable falsehoods than unpleasant truths.
Just as the common law evolves only in response to innovations in parasitism; just as science evolves only by the falsification of theories; so does truth telling evolve only by the incremental suppression of lying.
This should be clear enough for an individual with a Bachelors degree in a STEM discipline to follow.
Curt Doolittle.
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 11:22:00 UTC
http://forward.com/opinion/159955/converts-who-changed-the-church/WHAT THIS SAYS IS ‘NO CONVERTS ALLOWED’ : BRANDED. WALLED GHETTO, LEAVE, OR DIE.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 09:01:00 UTC
(worth repeating)
—What I like most, and what is difficult to recognize, is the HUMILITY of the Hovamal (heroic and individualist) and the ARROGANCE of Abrahamic scripture (authoritarian and collectivist).—
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-03 06:59:00 UTC