Theme: Religion

  • The data appears to be in: no converts accepted

    The data appears to be in: no converts accepted.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 10:07:00 UTC

  • “THE GREAT DISTRACTION: THE 20TH CENTURY EXPERIMENT WITH COSMOPOLITANISM’S SECON

    “THE GREAT DISTRACTION: THE 20TH CENTURY EXPERIMENT WITH COSMOPOLITANISM’S SECOND ATTEMPT AT MYSTICISM AND THE SECOND TRIUMPH OF SCIENCE”

    I mean, pretty much anything written through 1929 was pretty good. But starting with Boaz, Marx and Freud, and culminating in the 1970’s, cosmopolitanism and feminism tried and failed to create a new order – they merely destroyed the european order. Thanks to science we will overthrow conquest of the west by women and jews and slaves a second time.

    Someone else want to write that book? It needs writing.

    I have enough work to do.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 07:36:00 UTC

  • THE SPECTRUM OF ECSTASY (by Dominance) We are excited not by INSPIRATION (adding

    THE SPECTRUM OF ECSTASY (by Dominance)

    We are excited not by INSPIRATION (adding something) but INVOCATION (activating something)

    we think our religions are Inspiring. But they Activate. Most of what they activate is the submission to the pack response. This is a form of ecstasy.

    PACK/HERD/SUBJECTIVE/FOLLOW

    -4) Transcendence (euphoria)

    -3) Submission to the pack / spirituality (ecstasy)

    -2) Revelation (joy)

    -1) Inspiration/imitation (pleasure)

    0) Calm (neutrality)

    +1) Curiosity/Cooperation (pleasure)

    +2) Acquisition (joy)

    +3) The Kill (ecstasy)

    +4) Sex (euphoria)

    INDIVIDUAL/OBJECTIVE/LEAD

    I can’t help think that the dominance-submission spectrum describes aggregate behavior, but that dominance and submission may in fact represent different behaviors – or at least, that one can find aspects of the entire spectrum from multiple mental agents -which is probably what occurs.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 07:30:00 UTC

  • (Follow-up) The Failed Book of Athenian Truth, The Successful Book of Jerusalem Deceit.

    —Dr. Dolittle, you’re an ignorant anti-semite!!—

    [A]ctually I’m not anti-anything (and certainly not anti-gene pool, just the opposite) other than theft and deceit, and I am probably the most knowledgeable person working today on the subject of Truth, and its consequences in Ethics, Morality, and Politics. Which I’m happy to demonstrate in any debate with anyone living at any time. And I probably know the very few people capable of debating me. Either statements are true, statements are false or statements are undecidable. Either you can attack the arguments that I put forward or you cant. No name calling will alter the truth or falsity of the statements. All it demonstrates is that you’re either ignorant or dishonest. The fact of the matter is that westerners discovered quite by accident, the technology of truth and it resulted in reason, science, medicine, technology and nearly all significant advancements made by mankind. The fact of the matter is that for some reason, probably necessity, the hebrews created very useful means of deception of simple people who wished for the world to be other than it is. Their first great lie was scriptural monotheism. Their second great lies were pseudoscience. The New England neo-puritans (my people, my ancestors, since my ancestors were norman and then puritans in the plymouth and new haven colonies,) evolved into the anti-slavery movement as a way of preparing the way for women’s suffrage. This is all well documented history. Sorry. The combination of the radical changes of the industrial revolution, the anglo, french, german, and jewish enlightenment failures, and the failure of western governments to successfully adapt rule of law and political processes that provide a means of constructing commons, could not adapt. While a good number of our greatest minds understood that a problem was in progress they failed at solving it. Poincaré, Russell, Mises, Hayek, Popper, Bridgman, Brouwer, all failed to solve the problem of the social sciences. And because they failed, the 20th century will be remembered both as a rapid economic expansion, and (as Hayek warned it would be) a century of mysticism. Or, given their lack of understanding of the reason for the success of the discipline of science, ‘the century of pseudoscience.’. These are just facts. Deal with reality. We don’t need more lies. We’ve destroyed western civilization with those lies.

  • (Follow-up) The Failed Book of Athenian Truth, The Successful Book of Jerusalem Deceit.

    —Dr. Dolittle, you’re an ignorant anti-semite!!—

    [A]ctually I’m not anti-anything (and certainly not anti-gene pool, just the opposite) other than theft and deceit, and I am probably the most knowledgeable person working today on the subject of Truth, and its consequences in Ethics, Morality, and Politics. Which I’m happy to demonstrate in any debate with anyone living at any time. And I probably know the very few people capable of debating me. Either statements are true, statements are false or statements are undecidable. Either you can attack the arguments that I put forward or you cant. No name calling will alter the truth or falsity of the statements. All it demonstrates is that you’re either ignorant or dishonest. The fact of the matter is that westerners discovered quite by accident, the technology of truth and it resulted in reason, science, medicine, technology and nearly all significant advancements made by mankind. The fact of the matter is that for some reason, probably necessity, the hebrews created very useful means of deception of simple people who wished for the world to be other than it is. Their first great lie was scriptural monotheism. Their second great lies were pseudoscience. The New England neo-puritans (my people, my ancestors, since my ancestors were norman and then puritans in the plymouth and new haven colonies,) evolved into the anti-slavery movement as a way of preparing the way for women’s suffrage. This is all well documented history. Sorry. The combination of the radical changes of the industrial revolution, the anglo, french, german, and jewish enlightenment failures, and the failure of western governments to successfully adapt rule of law and political processes that provide a means of constructing commons, could not adapt. While a good number of our greatest minds understood that a problem was in progress they failed at solving it. Poincaré, Russell, Mises, Hayek, Popper, Bridgman, Brouwer, all failed to solve the problem of the social sciences. And because they failed, the 20th century will be remembered both as a rapid economic expansion, and (as Hayek warned it would be) a century of mysticism. Or, given their lack of understanding of the reason for the success of the discipline of science, ‘the century of pseudoscience.’. These are just facts. Deal with reality. We don’t need more lies. We’ve destroyed western civilization with those lies.

  • Yes, conservatives want things like nuclear families, individual responsibility,

    Yes, conservatives want things like nuclear families, individual responsibility, and meritocracy. Just like Sharia?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-09 11:47:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674556077502017536

    Reply addressees: @Salon @ReactionaryTree

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673872872239157248


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Salon

    “If you are a Jew, you should be very afraid of Donald Trump” https://t.co/WUzUk5s5xD https://t.co/OMs7LpjAIv

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673872872239157248

  • “If we can ban the import of cattle because a subset have hoof and mouth disease

    —“If we can ban the import of cattle because a subset have hoof and mouth disease, then we can certainly ban muslims because a (rather large) subset have the ‘fundamentalism’ disease”— JM

    (sorry, but that really made ma laugh)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-09 06:12:00 UTC

  • State vs Religion is an antique distinction. A competitor has differences in Val

    State vs Religion is an antique distinction. A competitor has differences in Values, Norms, Laws. Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-08 17:50:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674284958748434432

    Reply addressees: @andrew88fields @AnnCoulter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674283152412696576


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674283152412696576

  • Iran is a country with boundaries and govt that can be held accountable. Islam i

    Iran is a country with boundaries and govt that can be held accountable. Islam is a political system that can’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-08 17:47:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674284164816969728

    Reply addressees: @andrew88fields @AnnCoulter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674283152412696576


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674283152412696576

  • Funny in retrospect that Christianity is a nonsense promise, and so was the enli

    Funny in retrospect that Christianity is a nonsense promise, and so was the enlightenment, and so was the counter-enlightenment in the french moral, german rational, and jewish pseudoscientific forms.

    The success of the west is apolitical: to avoid the political.

    property, Rule of law, jury, market…. duh.

    But the WANT for consensus – the false consensus bias. All these behaviors make us WANT government. When the fact is all of it’s bad.

    We need markets for goods, services, and commons. The only monopoly is law and property


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-08 10:27:00 UTC