http://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-attacks-terrorism-europe-muslims-brussels-attacks-airport-metro/http://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-attacks-terrorism-europe-muslims-brussels-attacks-airport-metro/
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 20:57:00 UTC
If I reject Babylonian, Jewish, and Egyptian mysticism, that does not mean I reject christian love and paternalism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 18:50:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715249863559147520
Reply addressees: @soapjackal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715222428339691520
IN REPLY TO:
@soapjackal
@curtdoolittle I imagine Ill have to wait for your book in regards to a non-sophist rejection of Christianity (I remain unconvinced thus far
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715222428339691520
If you want to find an excuse in religion or philosophy you will find it if you look hard enough. Most philosophers looked hard enough.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 15:11:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715194841911701504
If you want to find an excuse in religion or philosophy you will find it if you look hard enough. Most philosophers looked hard enough.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 11:14:00 UTC
JUSTIFICATIONISM
***If you want to find an excuse in religion or philosophy you will find an excuse if you look hard enough. Most philosophy is an exercise in looking hard enough.***
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 11:03:00 UTC
You see, to our government, america is a religion not a country. it is a movement, not a nation. It is the expression of anglo evangelism, with jewish deception. It is evil. But the evil do not know they are evil any more than the muslim understands his pillars are evil.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-29 05:41:00 UTC
You wouldn’t argue the by referring to any other bit of literature. you would try to learn from literature the way we learn from myths and parables. Just because you derive wisdom from something doesn’t mean it’s a test of truth or necessity.
WTF is wrong with these people. They’re freaking crazy. The fact that they’re spouting crazy literature as if it’s science conveys upon them some sort of protection? Why? I don’t listen to schizophrenics. I don’t listen to german rationalists for that matter.
I consider myself a religious and spiritual person, even if my concepts of these things are somewhat esoteric – scientific even – to the point where its arguable we are talking about the same things. I am skeptical of people who lack such things because there is too high an incidence of sociopathy among them.
But people who argue using religious literature are no different from people arguing by referring to Dr Seuss. It’s ridiculous.
Sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 15:30:00 UTC
a public board for people still practicing the ancient Greek/Roman religion. You will love it
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 13:45:00 UTC
NO MORE BOOKS OF LIES
The Vedas were invented to control
The Avesta invented to divide
The Talmud invented to deceive.
The Bible invented to enslave.
The Koran invented to conquer.
Das Capital to steal.
The General Theory to Impoverish.
The Truth to set us free.
NO MORE LIES.
#NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 10:05:00 UTC
CHRISTIAN LOVE AS AN EXCEPTIONAL EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY
(important)
I do hold to Christianity in this sense: in the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. But I hold to this principle for four reasons: a) that emotion interferes with the reason necessary to plan and alter the course of events for our benefit, and b) trusting first and punishing later provides greater opportunity to entrap unethical and immoral people and eliminate them more quickly, and c) trusting first and investing first, create exceptional economic and innovative velocity, and (d) it is more joyous and less wasted effort if we can trust one another and severely punish the criminal, unethical, and immoral.
Christian Love Is Rational in a Militia, under natural law, under common law, under rule of law, under universal standing, using Testimony, Jury, and Judge.
This is the rational case for the central proposition of Christianity: Love. To Love is to bear the risk of harm, and punish the wicked in order to sort them from society faster – all the wile increasing economic and intellectual velocity.
Love is a bear trap for the wicked.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
#NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 04:24:00 UTC