Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • THE WESTERN CANON —“According to the medieval poet Jean Bodel, the Matter of R

    THE WESTERN CANON

    —“According to the medieval poet Jean Bodel, the Matter of Rome was the literary cycle made up of Greek and Roman mythology, together with episodes from the history of classical antiquity, focusing on military heroes like Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar.

    …

    The Matter of Rome also included what is referred to as the Matter of Troy, consisting of romances and other texts based on the Trojan War and its aftereffects, including the adventures of Aeneas.”—

    —“Bodel divided all the literary cycles he knew best into the Matter of Britain, the Matter of France and the Matter of Rome (although “non-cyclical” romance also existed). “—

    This is the same organization that victorians used, but added german and norse.

    The Beginning

    – The Flood – The Story Of The Black Sea Deluge

    – The Rise – The Story of the Aryans -Horse Wheel, Bronze

    – The Fall – The Story of the The Sea Peoples

    The Awakening – Homer

    – The Iliad and the Odyssey

    The Mediterranean

    – Aesop’s Fables

    – The Myths of Greece and Rome

    – The Story of Aneas

    – The Story of Alexander

    – The Story of Caesar

    The Fall

    – The Story of the Fall of Celitica to Rome

    – The Story of the Fall of Rome

    – The Story of the First Great Crime (judeo-christianity)

    – The Story of the Devastation of Islam

    – The Story of the Invasion of the Mongols

    – The Story of the Invasion of the Turks and loss of Byzantium.

    The Dark Ages

    – The “Fairy Tales”

    – The Story of The Isle (pre literate britain)

    – The Story of Arthur (de christianized)

    – The Matter of France (Carolingian Epic)

    – The Matter of Germany, and the North

    – The Matter of Slavs

    The Resurrection –

    – The Rise and Fall of the Templars – Bankers

    – The Rise of the Hansa (north sea) civilization

    – The Rise of science, law, reason,

    – The Rise Water, Steam, and Steel

    – The Atlantic Empire And The Stall of Hansa

    – The Colonial Expansion

    The Second Great Crime:

    – The Divergence of the Anglosophere

    – The Counter – Enlightenment

    – – France, Rousseau, Napoleon

    – – Jews, Marx/Freud/Boaz

    – – The Truncation of Russia, Stalin

    – – The Horrors of China, Mao

    – The Failed Restoration of Hansa Civilization

    – – Romanticism

    – – Germany Hitler

    – The Destruction of America

    – The Islamic invasion of the West

    The Resurrection

    – Truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 17:56:00 UTC

  • HOMER IS THE FOUNDER OF THE WEST’S RELIGION My position on homer is that he inve

    HOMER IS THE FOUNDER OF THE WEST’S RELIGION

    My position on homer is that he invented the heroic religion of western civilization by capturing in a narrative the ambitions of the aristocratic peoples. So I see homer, as the original author of the west’s bible, and all the greeks and our scientists, lawyers and philosophers as contributors. Our downfall is that we did not sythesize that corpus before the christians destroyed the civilization, but that now we are in a position to do so.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 13:01:00 UTC

  • THE ARYAN SPECIALIZATION IN DOMINANCE: ARISTOCRACY The church wrote the history.

    THE ARYAN SPECIALIZATION IN DOMINANCE: ARISTOCRACY

    The church wrote the history. The middle class wrote opposition: philosophy. The aristocracy did not write much of anything – other than aurelius. But they left us a record in the law.

    We evolved contractual (and therefore empirical) warfare. We evolved testimonial (empirical) truth. We evolved testimonial (empirical) law. We evolved empirical science. And we evolved them in that order.

    But we did not understand, and write down, our specialization in dominance, as we had written down our specialization in submission (christianity) or our specialization in middle class rebellion of exchange (philosophy).

    Because we did not engage in CONFLATION, but in SPECIALIZATION, we evolved excellences in each tradition: christian submission and care-taking, middle class philosophy and trade, and aristocratic dominance and violence and rule

    Our ancestors – lacking the imperial resources of the middle east and china – had to make use of every man possible in a militia: a voluntary, contractual method of warfare, funded with their own weapons and armor and training.

    To accomplish this they specialized in dominance in the aristocratic families just as the lower classes specialized in submission, and the small middle class specialized in voluntary exchange.

    So what the socialist and feminist attack on Aristocracy has consisted of, is to direct our mothers to education, and to deprive the boys of specialization in, improvement of, and mastery of dominance: to weaken us.

    The last bastion is the military, which they have finally attempted to undermine.

    They take advantage or our unwillingness to punish women and the weak.

    Yet what crime by women and the weak against our people is so worthy of punishment?

    We must re-master our dominance. We must remaster our violence. We must re-master our civilization. Or it will not only be gone. But we will deprive mankind of the one civilization, that through mastery of dominance and empiricism has raised mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, and disease and made possible our transcendence into the gods we seek?

    WE MUST:

    Create a ‘Book’ of Law for our people.

    Restore the profitability of domestication of man, beast, and nature.

    Restore rule of Law, Replace Legislation and Regulation with Contract.

    Restore the stoic schools.

    Restore the military schools

    Restore the regiment

    Restore the militia.

    Restore the separation of genders in education.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 07:27:00 UTC

  • A Few Personal Notes on Rorty

    5-Literature 4-Religion 3-Philosophy (Moral Entrepreneurs) 2-Intellectual History 1-History 0-Law 1-Science —Curt Tautology(necessary), Proof(possible), Rational(potential), Literature(meaningful) —Curt We are all relying upon narratives that provide decidability for the purpose of pursuing allies in the achievement of a condition, not truth. We only rely upon a truthful narrative when it assists us attracting allies in the achievement of a condition. –Curt Shinto when we’re born, Confucian when we’re adolescent, Christian when we’re married, Buddhist when we die. — Japanese Saying Rationality – in that one consents to be persuaded – is a social virtue not a human faculty. Reason is a human faculty. Rationality is a moral virtue – a property of cooperation. — Rorty restated by Doolittle “It’s not a surprise that religion, democracy, and science, are in conflict: power.”–Rorty “Another sense of philosophy describes how various ideas fit together.” — Rorty. Well, I would say that philosophy consists of logic (necessity), criticism (science), integration(rationality), advocacy(moral literature), and imagining (fantasy literature). And that religion conflates advocacy, imagining, and Law (force). –Curt “if we take care of education and democratic freedom then truth will take care of itself”–Dewey. Well, it turns out that Dewey/Rorty are wrong. Just the opposite. – Curt Judaism is, like American pragmatism, a feminine philosophy, in that consequences to the commons are irrelevant. All that matters is the consequences to those collectively extant in the moment. — Curt Rorty makes the progressive error of the steady-state. We always fight the red queen. We have lost that under the temporary prosperity of industrialism. But the red queen has shifted just as crime has shifted. We compete against economies and resources and institutions, not against farming and territory and demographics. — Curt What objectively right vs objectively better = Survival of your gene pool. It is objectively right, and objectively better. — Curt

  • A Few Personal Notes on Rorty

    5-Literature 4-Religion 3-Philosophy (Moral Entrepreneurs) 2-Intellectual History 1-History 0-Law 1-Science —Curt Tautology(necessary), Proof(possible), Rational(potential), Literature(meaningful) —Curt We are all relying upon narratives that provide decidability for the purpose of pursuing allies in the achievement of a condition, not truth. We only rely upon a truthful narrative when it assists us attracting allies in the achievement of a condition. –Curt Shinto when we’re born, Confucian when we’re adolescent, Christian when we’re married, Buddhist when we die. — Japanese Saying Rationality – in that one consents to be persuaded – is a social virtue not a human faculty. Reason is a human faculty. Rationality is a moral virtue – a property of cooperation. — Rorty restated by Doolittle “It’s not a surprise that religion, democracy, and science, are in conflict: power.”–Rorty “Another sense of philosophy describes how various ideas fit together.” — Rorty. Well, I would say that philosophy consists of logic (necessity), criticism (science), integration(rationality), advocacy(moral literature), and imagining (fantasy literature). And that religion conflates advocacy, imagining, and Law (force). –Curt “if we take care of education and democratic freedom then truth will take care of itself”–Dewey. Well, it turns out that Dewey/Rorty are wrong. Just the opposite. – Curt Judaism is, like American pragmatism, a feminine philosophy, in that consequences to the commons are irrelevant. All that matters is the consequences to those collectively extant in the moment. — Curt Rorty makes the progressive error of the steady-state. We always fight the red queen. We have lost that under the temporary prosperity of industrialism. But the red queen has shifted just as crime has shifted. We compete against economies and resources and institutions, not against farming and territory and demographics. — Curt What objectively right vs objectively better = Survival of your gene pool. It is objectively right, and objectively better. — Curt

  • “We Declare the British Isles, in their Totality, as Sacred Ground”

    “We Declare the British Isles, in their Totality, as Sacred Ground”

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-12 17:56:00 UTC

  • Violence alone (command) is an expensive method of rule. Religion is a cheap met

    Violence alone (command) is an expensive method of rule.

    Religion is a cheap method of rule.

    Credit is a very profitable method of rule.

    Rule by Religion can degrade rule of law.

    Rule by philosophy can ease rule of law.

    Credit requires Rule of law.

    Rule of law requires only Violence.

    Rule of law

    Educated by Philosophy.

    Incentivised by credit.

    Enforced by violence.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-12 13:51:00 UTC

  • OF OTHER RELIGIONS IS EVIDENCE OF OUR REPEAT OF OTHER CIVILIZATION’S FAILURES I

    https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=2i7GkX7bIYc&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DfKe600qHEAg%26feature%3DshareADOPTION OF OTHER RELIGIONS IS EVIDENCE OF OUR REPEAT OF OTHER CIVILIZATION’S FAILURES

    I would offer this alternative explanation to the author of the video:

    1) Westerners and easterners evolved in different ‘economies’ so to speak: westerners had small populations, with small farms, and pastorialism, a homogenous (single-ethnic) people, with harsh winters (intolerant climate), lacking any extremely productive resource (seasonal flooding that could be organized into irrigation through ‘slave’ labor). A culture with mostly heads of small businesses, requiring constant choices, seeking solutions.

    Conversely, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Hrappa, and Yang-tse, rivers were all open to irrigation and farming during cyclical, silt-replenishing floods. So (colder)westerners developed self-organizing Sovereignty, and (warmer)easterners developed authoritarian, organized (industriralized) farming. A culture with mostly slaves, lacking choices, seeking escapism.

    2) Western Philosophy evolved as a sovereign, aristocratic(propertied) discipline, for aristocratic(propertied) classes, for the purpose of RULE(profiting from organizing production). This rule includes: Rule of self(Sovereignty), Rule of household, Rule of business(farming, manufacture, and trade), and Rule of the Polity.

    When we are ruling self, household, business, and polity, we must place higher demands (value) upon our correspondence with reality, emotional tolerance for correspondence with reality, and continuous adaptation to reality, that we place upon interpreting reality in a way that lessens our emotional, intellectual, and physical burdens.

    In the west, we avoid conflation of disciplines and as such, we produced class-specializations in our ways of thinking:

    – Elites: Rule/law/war,

    – Upper: Finance/commerce/contract,

    – Middle: knowledge/reason/philosophy/morality, and

    – Working/Lower: religion/theology.

    Each depends upon the rest: an integrated polytheism of sorts. We preserved the competition between these disciplines. We preserve the sovereignty of each. And we do so because each represents the needs of the classes that they serve the interests of. The west(small manors and farms) never developed totalitarianism as did the east(industrialized flood-river farming), because we preserved sovereignty, so it was never necessary of the west to engage in conflationary argument as the east has done.

    3) Organized Religion and Eastern Philosophy evolved as a REACTION to the invention of Sovereignty and Rule. (Sovereignty ==> Zoroaster > Hinduism > Buddhism, and Polytheism > Authoritarian Monotheism > Scriptural Monotheism). There are many reasons for this reaction, but in large part, it is that sovereignty is a eugenic evolutionary strategy with upward redistribution of resources. While eastern socialism is a dysgenic evolutionary strategy.

    4) The west *DID* have it’s own version of Buddhism(mental discipline): Stoicism. And it was widely practiced until the schools were closed by the forcible conversion of the empire to Christianity in order to bring Oriental authoritarian mysticism into the declining empire. Why? Becuase it is very expensive to create truthful, empirical, high trust sovereign rule of law, and it is very cheap to create deceitful, mystical, low trust, authoritarian scripturalism. Reason requires voluntarily adopted education, and mysticism requires only ritualistic indoctrination.

    5) In modernity, we are saturated by information (most of which is false), and competition, An absence of norms in which we can find an identity, and our families have been destroyed by feminist legal activism, our intergenerational families have been destroyed through migratory labor and immigration. People live alone and lonely in boxes. Instead of the german model where they use building codes to produce cities with family sized apartments, we have spread people either in isolated suburbs, or limited reproduction in our cities by maximizing revenue per square inhabited meter – the result being that American and British Cities are IQ-sinks and Unused-Ovary graveyards.

    6) So I ask a different question: Why is it that we take the evidence of escapist eastern philosophy as a success, rather than its adoption means that we are replicating the east’s failures, and regressing to their authoritarianism and lack of choice?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-09 07:28:00 UTC

  • Fallen Angel vs Rising Beast

    11402340_10102719571463899_603079637725510922_o.jpg

  • Fallen Angel vs Rising Beast

    11402340_10102719571463899_603079637725510922_o.jpg