Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • (diary entry) (You know, I love my god, but sometimes I wish he would use a litt

    (diary entry)

    (You know, I love my god, but sometimes I wish he would use a little less … unpleasant means … of telling me what I need to do next. … Now, I admit that it is very hard to get through my thick skull and past the autism-barrier. And sure, I admit that I get stuck on sidetracks easily. And I admit most of all that I am resistant to changes in context. But given that I have devoted my entire life to his service. And despite the fact that he seems to be very demanding, and not terribly kind, you would think he would drop solutions and encouragement a little more obviously in my lap than the rather circuitous and painful route he almost always chooses. I am not selfish enough to think that he is testing me. I don’t think I have all that much agency anyway – I think I am merely a resource that will serve a purpose or be expended in trying. But the whole whip-the-boy-until-he-does-it kind of thing just seems … less productive than more proactive methods might be. … Now you see, I believe in god, I talk to god every day. I pray to him frequently. It’s a pretty personal relationship. But my god is nothing like the gods of Semites. That is just a stage costume or the masses. If I read history, he is far more like one of the original British, Germanic, Norse, and Greco-roman gods. And about as charming – so to speak. But it works for me. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 14:19:00 UTC

  • ELI ON WESTERN POLYTHEISM and CURT ON THE QUALITY OF GODS. —“Gods are importan

    ELI ON WESTERN POLYTHEISM and CURT ON THE QUALITY OF GODS.

    —“Gods are important for the wisdom and virtues they embody and exemplify. … But different classes and different castes make use of, and require, different wisdom and different virtues. … Therefore, they worship different gods, even if they call them by the same name. … The God of a warrior is not the same god as the God of a commercial trader, or the God of a laborer, or the God of a Housewife, or the God of a King, or the God of a scribe.”—Eli Harman

    Any individual, class group, tribe, nation, or race that states one god is superior to another claims only that their method of social order by which they compete against other social orders, is superior to another.

    People produce evidence of the superiority or inferiority of their social order, by the results of their competition against other social orders.

    There is only one measure of any god, just as there is only one measure of any people: the monumental, artistic, economic, and leisure status of its people. Weak poor people have weak poor gods. Gods who lie. Gods who mislead. Gods who enslave. Gods who breed ignorance. Gods who breed poverty. Gods who breed disease. Most gods are the product of the devil in man, not the good in him.

    Else there would be no poor. No ignorant. No enslaved. No misled. No deceived.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-31 17:17:00 UTC

  • Rule of Religion used ostracization for non-conformity to norms. Rule of law use

    Rule of Religion used ostracization for non-conformity to norms.

    Rule of law used punishment for failure to respect property rights.

    Rule of credit used deprivation for failure to keep pace with the red queen.

    Rule of slavery was immoral as hell but to some degree necessary.

    Rule of serfdom was immoral but survivable.

    Rule of religion was imperfect but arguably moral

    Rule of law was perfect but certainly moral

    Rule of credit is absolutely positively immoral.

    Consumer capitalism is one thing.

    Rule by credit is simply the most effective kind of slavery ever invented.

    End the ability to weaponize credit.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-29 16:53:00 UTC

  • YES CHRISTIANITY CAN SURVIVE SOVEREIGNTY 1) We cannot outlaw analogy, poetry, pa

    YES CHRISTIANITY CAN SURVIVE SOVEREIGNTY

    1) We cannot outlaw analogy, poetry, parable, myth, literature, and history, because they are the only possible means of pedagogy. We can however outlaw analogy, poetry, parable, myth, literature, and history that encourages the violation of natural law. Education and dispute resolution are two different things. Education must be meaningful, ethical and moral, dispute resolution must be true, ethical, and moral.

    2) If you do not attempt to use analogy, poetry, parable, myth, literature, and history, it in legislation and law, then Christianity is compatible with natural law. We already do not (and rarely have) allowed analogy, poetry, parable, myth, literature, and history in legislation and law.

    3) the seventh-day mandate is to limit the state, and limit employers, and limit slave owners from exhausting the population.

    4) –All men are sinners from birth–

    All men are rational at birth. It is through training and discipline that we limit their actions to those that are BOTH rational and productive, rather than merely rational.

    I don’t mind counter-signaling because it just provides opportunities to demonstrate and correct ignorance and a lack of understanding.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 11:59:00 UTC

  • TWO INSIGHTS: ‘THE PROBLEM OF THINKING IN INVERSE”, AND “THE PROBLEM OF THE FEMA

    TWO INSIGHTS: ‘THE PROBLEM OF THINKING IN INVERSE”, AND “THE PROBLEM OF THE FEMALE’S HEN-STRATEGY”

    Today’s two insights, one beautiful, one horrifying.

    1) spirituality is important and the language of spirituality necessary for the purpose of organizing in groups by means of incentives. But we can write laws and argue cases in Propertarianism and we cannot do that in the language of Nietzche, and Junger.

    When people hear me they do not realize that I do not see the problem of our time as rallying ourselves toward common interests, because in my mind we do not know what to rally in favor of, and we do not know how to stop the opposition by formal and institutional means, nor to maintain our defenses against them over time.

    Just as truth is what remains after we eliminate all error bias and deceit, sovereignty and markets are all that remain, once we eliminate violence, theft, fraud, MISINFORMATION AND DECEIT.

    So of course, I speak in NEGATIVES used to PROSECUTE, whereas most men want POSITIVES with used to RALLY.

    So without this understanding, the ‘right’ which is intuitionistic rather than intellectual,

    2) IT’S DECIVILIZING FEMININE STRATEGY IN GENERAL THAT AILS US: The global battle is against democracy and media under free deceitful speech, which has given women both the distribution mechanism and the proxy violence to overthrow their domestication, rather than simply seek legal parity. We desire equals with whom to cooperate, and are largely happy to hold our positions, because we are men. But women are like hens, in that they will perpetually destroy each other and everyone around them in order to achieve dominance by any means possible. Men are not good. But markets including a market for commons allowed them to conduct exchanges and cooperate while maintaining order. Women are not good. They are never good except to their children. We made them good by denying them alternatives, and democracy let them free.

    If you want to be horrified by uncomfortable scientific truths, then that is the one you should be most horrified by.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:28:00 UTC

  • THE WESTERN POLYTHEISTIC TRADITION A well trained stupid dog is still a joy arou

    THE WESTERN POLYTHEISTIC TRADITION

    A well trained stupid dog is still a joy around the house.

    A thoroughly Christianized prole is still a virtuous citizen.

    I”m not ant-christian. It’s awesome mythology. I”m non anti-church, it’s necessary competition for the state.

    I’m anti mysticism, pseudorationalsm, pseudoscience, and deceit.

    THE CLASSES AND POLYTHEISM

    Christianity(peasantry) ->

    ……. Rites and Paganism(knights) ->

    …………….Science and Biography (scientists and academics)

    ……………………..Common Law and Literature(burghers) ->

    ……………………………….Natural Law and History(Judges and Kings)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 10:27:00 UTC

  • Monopoly Thinking is Endemic in Democracy and Monotheism, but Not Polytheism and Propertarianism

    [No text content]

  • Monopoly Thinking is Endemic in Democracy and Monotheism, but Not Polytheism and Propertarianism

    [No text content]

  • CULTURAL MARXISM=RALLYING AND SHAMING THE WEST) – Race (Whites vs non-Whites) –

    CULTURAL MARXISM=RALLYING AND SHAMING THE WEST)

    – Race (Whites vs non-Whites)

    – Culture (Western vs non-Western)

    – Family (Nuclear family vs extended family)

    – Religion (Christianity vs Pseudoscience)

    – Gender (Men vs Women)

    – Sexual orientation (Heterosexual vs LGBT)

    – State (Nationalism vs Globalism)

    – Morality (Eugenic vs Dysgenic)

    Aristo Domestication’s Defense vs Prole Decivilization’s Defense.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 07:59:00 UTC

  • CHRISTIANITY As long as Christianity is compatible with natural law, and Christi

    CHRISTIANITY

    As long as Christianity is compatible with natural law, and Christian arguments in the commons are made with natural law, it’s merely a language of allegorical mythology.

    I clearly prefer the pagan to the Christian.I understand the superiority of the greek and roman over the pagan. But as far as I know the Pagan, Greek, Roman, and Christian are compatible with natural law.

    Morality is not determined by whether we argue by analogy, or history, or reason, or science, or testimony. It is that whether regardless of the language we use, the argument is reducible to conformation to natural law.

    Thou shalt not impose a cost upon others directly or indirectly except by productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-22 13:41:00 UTC