THE LEFT HAS DONE US A FAVOR
The left has done us a favor. By killing off Christianity they have removed the source of restraint that prevents us from returning to our aristocratic industry: the use of organized violence to rule, impose, markets, and collect revenues as commissions on our rule.
(And you wondered why the libertarians were anti-statist….)
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 09:59:00 UTC
BUT AT PRESENT THE ABRAHAMISTS OF ALL STRIPES ARE DEMANDING OUR TERRITORY.
Kevin Macdonald’s not quite right. White people do not have some strange altruism.
Instead, 1) we are less diverse, less clannish, less aggressive and it’s in our genes at present; 2) the aristocracy’s markets and production profit from labor and trade, so it’s cultural 3) the christian ethic extends this hyper-forgiveness as a means of reducing conflict over trivialities (ignorance, incompetence, bad manners, lack of sophistication) by asking us to pay high costs of purchasing new ‘customers’ and ‘associates’, so it’s religious. All of these traits encourage the development of trust and trade, which is why westerners prospered.
Sun Tzu suggests the same tolerance in his book on war. A king should not begrudge an enemy a horse, or a princess even. But when he demands territory one must ride off to war and destroy him. Westerners developed high tolerance, even rarely using capital punishment until the middle ages.
THE ABRAHAMISTS OF ALL STRIPES ARE DEMANDING OUR TERRITORY.
IT IS TIME TO RIDE OFF TO WAR.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 09:52:00 UTC
THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW AND COMPETITION IS WAR BY FRAUD RATHER THAN VIOLENCE.
Religion, when stated as positive law, consists of via-positiva commands and demands, and provides a means of subjugation, or division prior to conquest.
Religion, when stated as Wisdom Literature, seeks only to provide advice you may or may not choose to take, solace you may choose to take when in need, and reason for celebration with your kin, tribe, and nation.
Reason, when stated as a negative law, consists of via-negativa limits, provides a means of creating markets.
Science, as measurement, provides a test of the truth of statements of reason, wisdom literature, and religion.
1) There is only one natural law: reciprocity.
2) Any religion that claims any other law is both a violation of natural law, and therefore a deception, fraud, theft, and harm to mankind.
3) No religion that relies on any law other than natural law is not then a religion but a political system seeking to displace the current system by fraud, indifferent from seeking to displace the system of natural law by violence.
4) Any attempt to advocate, apply, or institutionalize any law other than Natural Law is an act of war.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 09:37:00 UTC
Aristocracy (Reason/Virtues)
Buddhism ( Supernatural virtues )
Zoroastrianism (Monotheistic, Virtues)
Judaism (monotheistic parasitism)
Christianity (monotheistic submission)
Islam (monotheistic aggression)
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 17:43:00 UTC
the Proto-Indo-European creation myth.
by Alexander Zavialov
Manu and Yemo travel the cosmos accompanied by a celestial cow. Manu then kills either Yemo or the cow and Pater Dyeus creates the world using their remains. Manu becomes the first priest in the process and establishes the practice of sacrifice. A third man, Trito, comes into existence after the creation of the world and Pater Dyeus presents him with cattle. The cattle is stolen by a three-headed serpent and Trito recovers the cattle, either by himself or with the assistance of Pater Dyeus. Thus, Trito becomes the first warrior and ensures that the reciprocal cycle of mutual giving between gods and humans continues.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 13:10:00 UTC
(F–k. After two years of hard work we are finally getting somewhere with religion. Damn. Truth was NOTHING compared to the problem of religion. )
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 09:50:00 UTC
THE ECONOMICS OF IMPOSING RELIGIONS
(abrahamic cultural regression and genetic dysgenia vs aryan cultural evolution and genetic eugenia )
By Matej Lovrić
Religion serves as a social technology for cutting stability ( administration? ) costs when dealing with massive number of people in dominance hierarchy.
After some time, rents for ruling classes are very low in an empire because of constant rise in cost of stability for the emperor ( Then it can be used for warfare – the Ottoman Empire being the best example).
And then the empire can expand again.
It’s a Cheap way of creating massive doses of oxytocin.
(CURT: the spread of submission by the spread of via-positiva ignorance by the suppression of innovation and competition, by the demand for conformity. This differs from via-negativa rule of law, which suppresses parasitism and innovations in parasitism, FORCING innovation and competition. In other words, ABRAHAMIC REGRESSION vs ARYAN EVOLUTION.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 09:49:00 UTC
THE LIMIT TO CHRISTIAN ETHIC: A CALCULATION PROBLEM
(I love this because it illustrates the need for limits of any theory)
by William Butchman
The beneficial strategy of Christianity is its attempt to increase the size of the cooperative in-group, which has obvious positive outcomes.
The problem is that the larger the group, the more calculation problems we get in trying to determine reciprocity, which is why there is a genetic (ethnic) limit: within a certain genetic distance it seems that we can manage it.
I see that as part of the problem for Christianity: articulating the boundaries to in-group cohesion.
There has to be a boundary, so maybe there was a gain by pushing it from clan > tribe > nation.
But then there are limited returns beyond nation, although I think there is a racial interest to defend.
—
Curt: this is one of the most articulate expressions I’ve heard. “it’s a calculation problem”, and exceeding the limits of the theory invalidates the theory.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 09:43:00 UTC
( Eli Harman: Not that I want to get involved, but I seem to have gotten myself involved by accident, so what is the deal with Greg and the white sharia thing?
I mean, memes are sarcastically hyperbolic, and I block memes on my own page but I recognize memes have value in other (less literate) forums.
I don’t engage in white-sharia kind of explicitly hyperbolic argument but I understand its marketing value in other forums.
I use my own version of attention-getting by attacking sacred cows, which is, implicitly hyperbolic. And once in awhile I will use some oxymoron like ‘market fascism’ or ‘natural law fascism’ for hyperbolic marketing purposes.
And I’ve argued that hyperbole is the means by which conservatives illustrate their long time preference by use of the kantian categorical imperative: “What if everyone did that?”
But I don’t understand what is going on? Is the problem for him that white sharia isn’t identifiably hyperbolic?
Thanks )
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 08:52:00 UTC
—“BUT CURT, MAYBE THE DRUIDIC PEOPLES USED RITUAL CANNIBALISM!!!!, AND THEREFORE THE CHURCH WAS BETTER!!”—
OK. let’s say that (a) they practiced human sacrifice, and (b) as part of the ritual, they ate some part of the hearts of victims. (c) that this was part of their druidic religion – or at least the pre-celtic religion of the monolithic builders.
Like slavery all peoples went through this phase. and it becomes untenable as the scale of productivity (economic cooperation) increases.
What does that have to do with the fact that a) romans conquered, defeated, decimated, and enslaved the celtic people and caused the death of one of the largest and oldest world civilizations, and as a consequence left a power vacuum for the germans from the north to fill, which in turn, along with the arabs, led to the fall of rome?
Now, then because they destroyed the celtic civilization and created the german migration, and invented christianity, as a means of rule by deception where they had previously used rule by law and commerce, they eradicated greek knowledge by closing the schools, imposing a superstitous religion of ignorance, and cause an INTELLECTUAL dark age, that took a thouasand years to even BEGING recover from, rather than just an economic and population decline that was reersible. I mean, you can easily reverse an economic and population decline with time. But it took rediscovery of greek reason and roman law, and a series of vast wars in european history, and the reformation, and the enlightenment, and the colonial period, and the world wars, and the rise of marxism, and we are STILL not free of the evils that were imposed upon us by the forcible introduction of christianty.
How will we cure the islamic world?
Abrahamism was the greatest evil ever invented by men and will be seen in history as what it is: a regressiv virus of the mind meant to impoverish and enslave, as an inexpensive means of rule.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 08:16:00 UTC