Theme: Religion

  • Is Russia Our Enemy?

    Russia is not so much an enemy as Russia and Russians feel somewhere between a messianic and religious conviction that they must restore Orthodox civilization, and that the west has consistently prohibited their efforts – and the truth is we were wrong and the russians were right.

    Russia is paying a very high price for the Bolshevik and Soviet Eras.

    We were wrong in entering WW1. Wrong in entering WW2. Wrong not to defeat the communists in China, and wrong not to immediately include the Russians in NATO. We were right to crush Saddam Hussein but wrong to try to create a democracy, rather than let the existing peoples replace him.

    Russia merely screwed up invading Ukraine. She could have easily bought all of ukraine other than Galacia (in the west) for a song, and now she has made herself a threat again.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Russia-our-enemy

  • Why Can’t The Us Just Obliterate The Likes Of China And Russia?

    Because we are Europeans. We are the world’s Aristocracy. We invented aristocracy. We are also, unfortunately, Christians. Meaning we play ‘extremely forgiving tit for tat’. And so we don’t do that. We civilize people instead. It’s just more profitable.

    Look. when the Great Khan was to decimate China, his advisors told him how much money he could make by taxing them rather than just robbing and killing them.

    If you’re a westerner, with the only high trust civilization on earth, making customers is simply more profitable than killing them. 3500 years ago the Indo Europeans and conquered pretty much everything from the atlantic to the source of the Yellow River, and from the arctic circle to Egypt, with the Iranians dominating the warm climates and the europeans dominating the cooler climates.

    It’s just profitable to rule.

    It’s also really hard to profit from rule when almost everyone on earth is dead and the people who are left want to kill you.

    The real question is why the west and the russians don’t get together and kill everyone else and just enjoy the rest of history together.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-cant-the-US-just-obliterate-the-likes-of-China-and-Russia

  • Why Can’t The Us Just Obliterate The Likes Of China And Russia?

    Because we are Europeans. We are the world’s Aristocracy. We invented aristocracy. We are also, unfortunately, Christians. Meaning we play ‘extremely forgiving tit for tat’. And so we don’t do that. We civilize people instead. It’s just more profitable.

    Look. when the Great Khan was to decimate China, his advisors told him how much money he could make by taxing them rather than just robbing and killing them.

    If you’re a westerner, with the only high trust civilization on earth, making customers is simply more profitable than killing them. 3500 years ago the Indo Europeans and conquered pretty much everything from the atlantic to the source of the Yellow River, and from the arctic circle to Egypt, with the Iranians dominating the warm climates and the europeans dominating the cooler climates.

    It’s just profitable to rule.

    It’s also really hard to profit from rule when almost everyone on earth is dead and the people who are left want to kill you.

    The real question is why the west and the russians don’t get together and kill everyone else and just enjoy the rest of history together.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-cant-the-US-just-obliterate-the-likes-of-China-and-Russia

  • WHY I AM A CHRISTIAN, AND AN ARYAN (ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIAN) I am a Christian b

    WHY I AM A CHRISTIAN, AND AN ARYAN (ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIAN)

    I am a Christian because, as I understand it, to ‘be a Christian’ requires:

    (a) That the law of “God” meaning the Universe, is Natural Law, and that I am bound to both obey and force others to obey this law.

    (b) That the philosopher Jesus advised us – albeit in primitive language – to extend kinship love to non kin because it was the optimum prisoner’s dilemma strategy, and led to greater prosperity. Particularly in the west where markets and meritocracy were imposed as an inexpensive means of profitable rule by the Aristocracy. And even more so when combined with the exclusively western tolerance for climbing the dominance hierarchy via truth telling, even at status-cost to all involved. (heroism).

    (c) That we retain a dying, archaic, but psychologically necessary institution called the Church with gorgeous architecture, that served as a House of Feminine Familial Commons that divided labor with the Aristocracy’s House of Masculine Material Commons, but that, along with the church’s academy, has been (((occupied))) by those intent on destroying the West this time even more so than in the ancient world,

    (d) That we have retained a bunch of unnecessary archaic mumbo-jumbo invented for the inexpensive subjugation ignorant and stupid people, but that I can look past that to our ancestral past, and in those aristocratic myths and traditions find superior lessons for the more sophisticated people of today than those taught to the lowly in the past – before the rediscovery and reconquest of the west by the literature of the Aristocracy.

    (e) And that I made a promise to my god that I would do something about this catastrophe and save my people from a second conquest by more insidious forms of Abrahamism than the first. And that I have pursued this promise when quite young and have pursued it at great personal cost in each phase of my life.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 18:44:00 UTC

  • Why can’t we have a Pope of Natural Law?

    Why can’t we have a Pope of Natural Law?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:50:00 UTC

  • ABRAHAMIC ARGUMENTS ARE ALL FEMINIST. Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Cosmopolitan(Je

    ABRAHAMIC ARGUMENTS ARE ALL FEMINIST.

    Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Cosmopolitan(Jewish), and Postmodern (French).

    The weaponization of the female strategy of undermining alphas through shaming, gossip, lying and rallying large numbers of the inferior and the weak, so that capital is not concentrated in the best for the purposes of evolutionary transcendence, but distributed to those lacking merit for the purpose of evolutionary regression.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:49:00 UTC

  • USE THE PEJORATIVE “ABRAHAMISM”: THE FEMALE STRATEGY That’s why I tell people to

    USE THE PEJORATIVE “ABRAHAMISM”: THE FEMALE STRATEGY

    That’s why I tell people to use the pejorative ‘Abrahamism’ so that we can take down lying no matter what sect makes use of it. they’re all liars. They cannot hide behind our defense of christianity any longer, if we no longer defend the church, only natural law which predates the church.

    Abrahamism: the use of the feminine reproductive strategy, (r-selection) and the use of feminine means of argument: gossip and deceit.

    Abrahamism is the only successful method of rebelling against aristocracy whether a peerage of markets by europeans, or a monolithic bureaucracy by the chinese.

    THe hindus aryanized aristocracy with castes. The buddhists tried, but could only invent buddhism not Stoicism. The chinese developed reason and bureaucracy and command. The west developed reason, and science and law, and markets in everything, and because of that we could develop Stoicism.

    But in 3500 years of dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty, we and the chinese have only encountered one successful strategy: the weaponization of the female strategy of gossip, deceit, henpecking, and parasitism, and the weaponization of reproduction without merit of one’s offspring: dysgenia. r-selection.

    All of history can be reduced to the invention of Aristocracy, the domestication of primitive peoples, and the successful rebellion by the semitic underclass’s use of the weaponization of the female reproductive strategy, just as women rally against and undermine alphas.

    That’s all of the history of civilization right there. It’s that simple.

    Evolution by K. Devolution by R.

    The female was the first animal we tamed, and we didn’t do a good enough job.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:46:00 UTC

  • AN ARGUMENT WITH A MUSLIM: HERE IS HOW IT IS DONE. STAY ON MESSAGE. REPEAT THE T

    AN ARGUMENT WITH A MUSLIM: HERE IS HOW IT IS DONE. STAY ON MESSAGE. REPEAT THE TRUTH. EXPOSE THEIR LIES JUST LIKE WE DO AGAINST LIBERTARIANS AND LEFTISTS.

    (You see, they sold their lies on the presumption that empirical evidence would accumulate more slowly their means of conquest of the underclasses. It worked among the jews, it worked in the ancient world via the christians. It worked in the medieval world by the church, and it ALMOST worked in the modern world by the jewish cosmopolitans and their french allies.)

    (I also want to interject that this fellow relies on feminine argument techniques such as NAXALT, False moral equivalency, and shaming, and straw men. And this leads us to repeat the observation that the jews (communists), the french (the most effeminate of europeans) and women (feminist, socialists), all make use of the female reproductive strategy, and the female means of argument. As such we must understand that it is the attempt to devolve society again by the reintroduction of matrilenalism, and if possible, matriarchy, that is being empoyed by islam, judaism, christianity, feminism, communism, socialism, postmodernism… all the ism’s against aristocracy here and in china are means of rebelling against our invention of aristocracy.)

    Jahan Khalili If Islam and poverty always existed there, but the radicalization never appeared until you started poking the hornet’s nest, the source of the radicalization is yourselves.

    (CURT: Um. Islam, evolved out of christianity as a means of resistance against the roman empire, the same way that judaism evolved out of zoroastrianism as a means of resisting the persian and egyptian and hittite and … every other superior people.

    Curt Doolittle This isn’t right. No one is very honest about these things so here is the very, very simple answer:

    (a) The purpose of american involvement was to prevent the soviets and the chinese from exporting communism and militarism to the oil lands.

    (b) the purpose of american policy since the end of world communism has been to transform the muslim world into a civilized rule of law and consumer capitalism and drag it out of ignorance and poverty as we did european, sinic, hindu, and christian african civilization.

    The problem is that muslims neither possessed the demographics (most muslim nations have near subsaharan african IQ’s), nor the history of quality rule (outside of persia) as did china and india (and less so russia). Nor any have muslims adopted literacy as had those countries, nor education. Nor had muslims adopted

    The USA’s supposition that persia could secularize, restore it’s heritage and develop into a core state for islam. WHen this failed americans tried to do the same with Turkey. However, it appears that demographically this is nearly impossible and that we must treat islamic countries (or at least the arab muslim countries) as just a militant version of subsaharan africa, that must be contained and allowed to mature at their own rate, just as we contained Russia and China.



    Curt Doolittle Islam was never able to break kin, clan, tribal, and national bonds, nor able to nor able to develop a professional governemnt, nor develop deflationary thought, and was unable to modernize in response to the industrial revolution.

    Jahan Khalili “The purpose of american involvement was to prevent the soviets and the chinese from exporting communism and militarism to the oil lands. “

    OK, so the purpose of terrorists who attack the West is to change the West.

    What are you trying to say? That purpose = right to do something?

    Curt Doolittle The only hope was Persia. The second hope was Turkey. But the ethnic arabs are, and seemingly have been, unable to develop land-holder (agrarian) ethics, and to develop agrarian genetics, and without these is having difficulty transitioning to industrial, and not even informational era ethics.



    Jahan Khalili Islam is not something monolithic. Muslims are fighting with each other.

    Curt Doolittle I have a very precise and scientific definition of right. So yes, they had teh ‘right’ to do something, since islam has been at war with the west for 1400 years, and has destroyed roman, north african, persian, byzantine, and north indian civilizations.

    Jahan Khalili Islamic imperialists judge the West just as harshly. The Westerners have been unable to stop spreading corruption like porn and alcohol. What do we do about these problematic corrupters and vice-spreaders?



    Curt Doolittle Islam is monolithic in the the sense that it is, like the other two abrahamic religoins, a set of lies, the purpose of which is to create ignorance, so that simple bpeople can be subjeted to rule.

    Curt Doolittle Porn and alcohol and nude women and all other temptations are designed to entrap weak people of weak character so that we can imprison or kill or punish them, and prevent them from reproduction.

    (CD: he moved on too fast, but this was a great opportunity to show that islam actually PREVENTS the acccumulation of the skills necessary for the suppression of implsiveness, which is why it is so useful for inferior peoples.)



    Jahan Khalili Can you explain how ISIS murders Shi’ites and Saudi Arabia persecutes them, if Islam is monolithic?

    (CD: Note the use of NAXALT)



    Curt Doolittle WHat does infighting have to do with the fact that islam has destroyed at least four superior more advanced civilizations, lost two standard deviations of intelligence, and impoverished everyone it touches, buy the mandatory indoctrination of people into a set of falsehooods, and fictional history, the purpose of which is merely to make them easeir to rule?



    Jahan Khalili The Islamic fanatics view the West as monolithic, too, with its many countries, cultures and very different and formerly fighting forms of Christianity. Would you agree with them?



    Curt Doolittle You know, a scientist doesn’t use ‘ideal’ terms like ‘monolithic’ because they are like religious terms, means of lying. Instead, we use deflationary language in order to prevent lying.



    Jahan Khalili Dude, you’re not an authority on this subject. You’re repeating propaganda that the Muslim-haters use as self-justification for further intervention, which caused this mess in the first place.

    Curt Doolittle So, the west has had conflcits. The musim world has had conflicts. But the fact of the matter is that arabs are the dumbest and most ignorant people in the world outside of south africa, and that they have destroyed four major successful civlivations, and reversed the evolution by down breeding.

    Islam has caused more death, ignorance, and harm than every other event otehr than the black plague and malaria.



    Curt Doolittle I am, in fact, an authority on this subject.



    Jahan Khalili That’s what you say

    Curt Doolittle I am in fact, quite possibly THE authority on truth.



    Jahan Khalili Catholic-Protestant wars

    Curt Doolittle And you are, as is typical, like an Abrahamist, avoiding any sense of empirical or logical argument by attempting to create moral equivalency by suggesting equality between things that are empirically and logically not equal in consequence.



    Jahan Khalili “I am in fact, quite possibly THE authority on truth.”

    Ridiculous. What’s the difference between you and prophet Mohammad?

    Jahan Khalili I have a beard and dark complexion and an Iranian name. That makes me an Abrahamist?

    (Note the suggestion that his appearance rather than his method of argument identifies him. Your method of argument determines your allegiance. )



    Curt Doolittle Mohammed, if he existed, was never mentioned during his lifetime, and every stitch of what is attributed to him is appropriated from christian and jewish sects. What separates me from ‘fictionalism’ is called ‘science’ or what is more accurately called ‘measurement’ rather than ‘analogy’, ‘parable’ and ‘fiction.



    Jahan Khalili

    There is no such a thing as a person who has the whole truth. Maybe you should be more humble. Have you ever even lived in an Islamic country?

    (CURT: Straw Man. Hyperbole.)



    Jahan Khalili

    I wouldn’t take an “expert on the West” who has never lived in the West seriously. We have plenty of those fake experts in Iran.

    (CURT: Note the fallacy: becuase you don’t know this particular, you can’t make claims about the general – ie: the consequences. Thats similar to saying that one’s intentions have some bearing on the consequences of one’s words and actions.)



    Curt Doolittle

    You are DEMONSTRATING abrahamic deceit by attempting to avoid answering the argument. This is the secret to abrahamic lying. Is or is it not true that the west rationally contained islamic peoples from adopting communism, and rationally still contains them because in the pre-modern era, for 1400 years, islam was a plague upon this earth causing more death and the destruction of more civilizations than the great diseases of malaria and the great plague, and the islamic peoples are still ignorant, illiterate, superstitious, poor, and expansionary, and violent, and harmful to more developed civilizations?

    THESE ARE SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC FACTS.

    Jahan Khalili

    Nonsense. You don’t know me or my motivations and are behaving like a fanatic yourself by projecting your ideas on me.

    (CURT: wait. A muslim… ‘projecting your ideas on me’. lol. No. I’m just trying to determine if he is a liar by intent or by habituation due to indoctrination into the lies Abrahamism.)



    Curt Doolittle

    You are demonstrating you are an Abrahamist (jew) by appealing to AUTHORITY (expert) rather than making an argument, or refuting an argument.

    Jahan Khalili

    LOL. I’m accused of appealing to authority after you claimed to be one?

    (CURT: Note that he stated that i needed to be an authority to have an opinion. lol So he made the appeal to authority, and I countered it.)



    Curt Doolittle

    I do not care what your motivations are. Your motivations are meaningless. (a) you are in fact making fraudulent arguments in the abrahamic tradition (b) you are in fact denying that islam has been the most destructive decivilizing force in history, and (c) you are denying that islam was a cancer on this earth and was the principle cause of the european dark ages because of raiding and plunder.



    Curt Doolittle

    So you are demonstrating abrahamism (jewishness) by your use of fraudulent argument, straw men, appealing to argument, denial of facts, use of moral equivalence between objectively moral and immoral civilizations.



    Curt Doolittle

    You are owned. You are had. You are defeated. You are a liar, an Abrahamist, and a justifier of lies, Abrahmism, violence, and the cancer of islamic civilization.

    Jahan Khalili

    Yes, everything is meaningless except your ideas which are golden cannon. No one – not even people who lived with actual Muslims – has any input that can be useful towards understanding the subject except yourself.

    (CURT: Ah. You don’t know how I feel fallacy. Straw man.)



    Jahan Khalili

    You are an angry man who is lashing out at someone you don’t even know over the internet.

    (CURT: Ad hom. Psychologism. Feminine. )

    Curt Doolittle

    So you again demonstrate that you are an abrahamic by making a false moral equivalency rather than answering the criticism that islam has been the most destructive influence on humanity other than the great plagues?



    Jahan Khalili

    You are aware that argument alone is insufficient to learn the truth, and that experience and gathering data play a role?

    (CURT: I kinda wonder how the empirical evidence of 1400 years of history and the destruction of four major civilizations has not been a matter of experience and data…. sigh)



    Curt Doolittle

    I dont’ care who you are because, it is my job as a moral man to stop evil in this world, and if you are an evil abrahamic justifier of parasitism devolution and death then it is my job to prosecute you.



    Jahan Khalili

    LOL. Whatever.



    Curt Doolittle

    Thank you for this discourse, so I can publish it and show others what it is like to argue with abrahamism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:20:00 UTC

  • RESTORING AND WEAPONIZING THE CHURCH There is nothing in the natural law that is

    RESTORING AND WEAPONIZING THE CHURCH

    There is nothing in the natural law that is not in the roman catholic church.

    There is nothing in natural law that is false.

    There is a great deal in the catholic church that is false, and therefore not in natural law.

    There is no reason we cannot teach the church’s history of natural law, and the myths of our people, rather than the lies of the conspirators who imposed ignorance and serfdom upon our people.

    There is no reason we cannot Aryanize the rituals. There is no reason we cannot restore the church to its prior status. There is no reason we cannot eliminate any competitors to it.

    I have finally solved the means of weaponizing the church. And the method will surprise you….

    But the false pope must go, and the (((heretics))) within her must be burned at the stake.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 15:45:00 UTC

  • THE STATE HAS IMPOSED AN ALIEN RELIGION By Joseph Nerevar The United States offi

    THE STATE HAS IMPOSED AN ALIEN RELIGION

    By Joseph Nerevar

    The United States officially did not have a state church, so one developed spontaneously.

    State religions are a method which members of the elite will use to co-ordinate the allocation of power. You are only allowed into their circles by making a public display of belief in the official religion.

    If the elite do not have one given to them, they will develop one spontaneously in order to perform the same function. But at least with an official state religion we can use an inquisition to prevent endless mutation into insane and hard-to-believe ideas, preventing state actors for being selected for stupidity.

    Ergo:

    You can only gain power within the current government by openly declaring the equality of men and women, of the races, of the holiness of sodomy, the coming wrath of climate change, and the 48 genders. And the insanities which people have to believe or pretend to believe mutate into something worst every year



    curt: natural law. truth is enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 13:04:00 UTC