Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reform

  • MY PURPOSE IS NOT YOURS BUT NATURAL LAW – OR ITS OPPOSITE – AND ANYTHING BUT THE

    MY PURPOSE IS NOT YOURS BUT NATURAL LAW – OR ITS OPPOSITE – AND ANYTHING BUT THE STATUS QUO.

    My mother just ‘gave me a talking to’ over my recent Quora posting. (Which I suspect will be another one of my most popular posts.) Then she finishes with a NAXALT, thereby demonstrating what she accuses me of.

    Remember my job: the institutionalization of natural law and the criminalization of fictionalism, so that we have no choice but to cooperate peacefully through voluntary exchanges, and cannot use the force of government to conduct parasitism through the state.

    Now, when you see me say some uncomfortable truth, understand that the purpose of doing so is not to obtain by moral shaming that which others have obtained against my people (white aristocracy), but to deflate those fictionalisms, so that we, together, can accept natural law.

    Because the alternative is that my generation and the one that is seizing power now, will make the nazis look like kindergarteners rather than allow this second dark age to come upon our people, by the continuation of the past century of marxism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism.

    So, I know, the first impulse is to think I am playing the same game of moral high ground that everyone else plays in this era of the industrialization of pseudo-science, pseudo-rationalization, and lying. But that’s not it. I’m trying to END the era of fictionalisms and lying. I want to End it FOREVER.

    And so my prosecutions are designed to deny you – all of you – your fictionalism, so that ony natural law of reciprocity prevails. Because unless we live under natural law, my incentive, and that of my brothers, is to return to subjugation and slavery, and a life of parasitism and leisure, rather than to allow you to do it upon us.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 14:58:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/opinion/sunday/is-it-time-to-break-up-google.html?_r=0https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/opinion/sunday/is-it-time-to-break-up-google.html?_r=0

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 02:08:00 UTC

  • COMMISSIONS ON THE MARKET (TAXES) SERIES Sales, financial transaction, income, i

    COMMISSIONS ON THE MARKET (TAXES) SERIES

    Sales, financial transaction, income, interest, and appreciation (in that series). I eliminate VAT because it’s distortive. And of those commission (taxes) income is the least distortive that I know of.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-21 06:12:00 UTC

  • YOU WANT A SYSTEMIC SOLUTION THAT WILL WORK? Max 24 hour work week, preferably 4

    YOU WANT A SYSTEMIC SOLUTION THAT WILL WORK?

    Max 24 hour work week, preferably 4 days. Forced retirement savings, 4 hour school day, prohibition on immigration outside of research in physical sciences, tiered medical insurance, zero interest home loans, direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers, end of child support, spousal support, and marital community property, and marital credit and taxation; creation of debt-‘dole’ on the british model. removal of women from the voting pool into a separate house. mandatory service in militia (expansion of national guard’) providing both natural disaster, emergency, medical, and defense capability – with fitness requirement through the age of 60, or heavy penalties. Requirement for strict construction of law, legislation, regulation. Revocation of civil war violations of natural law. Restoration of voluntary association and dissociation. Redistribution of income taxes to the states, which then forward them to the federal government. And total revocation of the federal ability to levy taxes.

    As a package it will sell. Incrementally it won’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-20 12:11:00 UTC

  • The Content of Religion – and the Failure of the Church

    Apr 13, 2017 1:53pm THE CONTENT OF RELIGION, AND THE FAILURE OF THE CHURCH Why did the church fail to reform? – anti-intellectualism. – superstition rather than myth. – peasant rather than middle class – agrarian rather than industrialism – suffering rather than heroism and possibility. – Semitic rather than European. Why did the church fail to produce a reformer? – why no Augustine, or Luther? – why was Smith/Hume/Jefferson insufficient? – why no accommodation for Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Durkheim, Nietzsche? The answer: Too much of a change. The academy took possession away from the church. The academy took funding away from the church. The state took all lands from the church. My response: Then it might have been possible if not for the world wars and communism. However, the germans were very close. The british traditionalists were very close. The church could have seized the opportunity, or it could have defeated the opposition: marxism. But it did neither. It was LAZY AND INTELLECTUALLY INCOMPETENT. As far as I know, all that matters in a religion is: (a) a community setting where individual expression prohibited. (signal free environment) (b) a very simple set of comprehensible laws (strategy) (c) a method of achieving mindfulness, and excuse for it. (d) recitation of myths, legends, history, heroes (e) application of past wisdom to current issues. (f) participatory rituals (praying, singing, moving). (g) participatory holidays ( relief – vacation days ) (h) participatory feasts (special holidays – family) (i) participatory festivals (sports, plays, games) (j) an institutional means of transference of all of the above between generations. (profession) The acts matter much more than the words. The acts produce the experience. The words JUSTIFY it. THE CHURCH WAS SO HEAVILY ANTI INTELLECTUAL IT ABANDONED THE PEOPLE TO THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE ACADEMY, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE STATE, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR, AND HID AMONG THE DEVELOPING WORLD’S POOR.

  • The Content of Religion – and the Failure of the Church

    Apr 13, 2017 1:53pm THE CONTENT OF RELIGION, AND THE FAILURE OF THE CHURCH Why did the church fail to reform? – anti-intellectualism. – superstition rather than myth. – peasant rather than middle class – agrarian rather than industrialism – suffering rather than heroism and possibility. – Semitic rather than European. Why did the church fail to produce a reformer? – why no Augustine, or Luther? – why was Smith/Hume/Jefferson insufficient? – why no accommodation for Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Durkheim, Nietzsche? The answer: Too much of a change. The academy took possession away from the church. The academy took funding away from the church. The state took all lands from the church. My response: Then it might have been possible if not for the world wars and communism. However, the germans were very close. The british traditionalists were very close. The church could have seized the opportunity, or it could have defeated the opposition: marxism. But it did neither. It was LAZY AND INTELLECTUALLY INCOMPETENT. As far as I know, all that matters in a religion is: (a) a community setting where individual expression prohibited. (signal free environment) (b) a very simple set of comprehensible laws (strategy) (c) a method of achieving mindfulness, and excuse for it. (d) recitation of myths, legends, history, heroes (e) application of past wisdom to current issues. (f) participatory rituals (praying, singing, moving). (g) participatory holidays ( relief – vacation days ) (h) participatory feasts (special holidays – family) (i) participatory festivals (sports, plays, games) (j) an institutional means of transference of all of the above between generations. (profession) The acts matter much more than the words. The acts produce the experience. The words JUSTIFY it. THE CHURCH WAS SO HEAVILY ANTI INTELLECTUAL IT ABANDONED THE PEOPLE TO THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE ACADEMY, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE STATE, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR, AND HID AMONG THE DEVELOPING WORLD’S POOR.

  • So, given that you think they are biased now, do you think we cannot reduce thei

    So, given that you think they are biased now, do you think we cannot reduce their bias through strict construction?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 19:51:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853697411994267649

    Reply addressees: @mcmaz1ng @primalpoly @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853693264939102209

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Its_Lynnocent

    @curtdoolittle @gmiller @JayMan471 Do juries do this? Sometimes. Is their record fantastic. Not particularly. Do i trust a court to through out all their biases in cases

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853693264939102209

  • THE CONTENT OF RELIGION, AND THE FAILURE OF THE CHURCH Why did the church fail t

    THE CONTENT OF RELIGION, AND THE FAILURE OF THE CHURCH

    Why did the church fail to reform?

    – anti-intellectualism.

    – superstition rather than myth.

    – peasant rather than middle class

    – agrarian rather than industrialism

    – suffering rather than heroism and possibility.

    – Semitic rather than European.

    Why did the church fail to produce a reformer?

    – why no Augustine, or Luther?

    – why was Smith/Hume/Jefferson insufficient?

    – why no accommodation for Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Durkheim, Nietzsche?

    The answer:

    Too much of a change. The academy took possession away from the church. The academy took funding away from the church. The state took all lands from the church.

    My response:

    Then it might have been possible if not for the world wars and communism. However, the germans were very close. The british traditionalists were very close. The church could have seized the opportunity, or it could have defeated the opposition: marxism. But it did neither. It was LAZY AND INTELLECTUALLY INCOMPETENT.

    As far as I know, all that matters in a religion is:

    (a) a community setting where individual expression prohibited. (signal free environment)

    (b) a very simple set of comprehensible laws (strategy)

    (c) a method of achieving mindfulness, and excuse for it.

    (d) recitation of myths, legends, history, heroes

    (e) application of past wisdom to current issues.

    (f) participatory rituals (praying, singing, moving).

    (g) participatory holidays ( relief – vacation days )

    (h) participatory feasts (special holidays – family)

    (i) participatory festivals (sports, plays, games)

    (j) an institutional means of transference of all of the above between generations. (profession)

    The acts matter much more than the words. The acts produce the experience. The words JUSTIFY it.

    THE CHURCH WAS SO HEAVILY ANTI INTELLECTUAL IT ABANDONED THE PEOPLE TO THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE ACADEMY, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE STATE, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR, AND HID AMONG THE DEVELOPING WORLD’S POOR.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 13:53:00 UTC

  • Where was Jesus while he was missing and how did he NOT learn of greek wisdom? H

    Where was Jesus while he was missing and how did he NOT learn of greek wisdom? How could he NOT attempt to reform the jews?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 11:28:00 UTC

  • FOR NEWCOMERS I understand the frustration with the inaccessibility of Propertar

    FOR NEWCOMERS

    I understand the frustration with the inaccessibility of Propertarianism (Natural Law) in its CURRENT FORM.

    I am leading in the way we need leading. I am providing the anti-marx (anti-abrahamism, anti platonism), and the ‘bible’ of western civilization- law beyond which no man or government may tread without suffering the pain of death.

    Is it not a lot to ask of a man, alone, to be aristotle and alexander in the same flesh? I’m only human. And a bit of a hobbit at that.

    If need be I’ll change uniforms, but at present, in my state of mind, I am doing what my people need most: creating their ‘book’.

    I’ll create the book(bible), the judges(priests), and the school (discipline of natural law).

    I would very much prefer someone else be alexander to my aristotle.

    Why? As you age your understanding of war increases, but your physical and mental energy for it declines. I can write for another twenty years. I can fight for another five.

    But time will take me. I can feel it. And it will take a generation or two to repair the damage of four.

    Affections

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 05:14:00 UTC