Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reform

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN” (repost from september

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN”
    (repost from september 2015)

    Western Man is moral man, and moral men need:

    1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.)

    2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.)

    3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.)

    4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors).

    5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (We need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set.

    And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service.

    One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Philosophy of Aristocracy
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-27 19:48:44 UTC

  • REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN” (repost from september 2015) Western Man is moral man, an

    REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN”

    (repost from september 2015)

    Western Man is moral man, and moral men need:

    1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.)

    2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.)

    3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.)

    4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors).

    5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (We need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set.

    And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service.

    One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-27 15:48:00 UTC

  • Don’t kid yourself. Liberalism (leftism) is a product of academy propaganda and

    Don’t kid yourself. Liberalism (leftism) is a product of academy propaganda and their (((propagandists))), and the private sector that uses entertainment as propaganda. End the university subsidy and it disappears overnight.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-27 11:07:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. MARK FACEBOOK – MISTAKE OF DOUBLING DOWN Ever

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    MARK FACEBOOK – MISTAKE OF DOUBLING DOWN
    Everyone doubles down. It’s the opposite of what you should do.

    Facebook (Mark) should have taken the opposite route: taken the position that it is impossible to monitor speech on this scale and that FB is at this point a necessary piece of world infrastructure similar to the other communication platforms and that they cannot possibly audit the content. and that countries must develop laws for regulating their own citizens on the platform as they do on all other platforms. FB would then regulate where advertising displays without regulating the content on the platform.

    Dum dum dum.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 01:41:39 UTC

  • MARK FACEBOOK – MISTAKE OF DOUBLING DOWN Everyone doubles down. It’s the opposit

    MARK FACEBOOK – MISTAKE OF DOUBLING DOWN

    Everyone doubles down. It’s the opposite of what you should do.

    Facebook (Mark) should have taken the opposite route: taken the position that it is impossible to monitor speech on this scale and that FB is at this point a necessary piece of world infrastructure similar to the other communication platforms and that they cannot possibly audit the content. and that countries must develop laws for regulating their own citizens on the platform as they do on all other platforms. FB would then regulate where advertising displays without regulating the content on the platform.

    Dum dum dum.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-25 21:41:00 UTC

  • Stupid: The Short Obvious, Selfish, Moron-Route to Political Change

    —“What’s your position on mixing?”— Which question are you asking me? As a jurist of natural law? As a public intellectual practicing political economy seeking political solutions to optimum flourishing? Or as an anglo northern european man seeking the intersets of my people? Or as a man who loves his kinfolk first and foremost? As a jurist of natural law it is a question for a polity to choose mixing or not, since underclass mixing seems to be as beneficial as working, middle, and upper class race mixing is counter-productive. And as such the optimum conditions for all are to create many states, that produce commons that reflect the interests of the people who live in them. Nationalism is in the interests of all people. As a public intellectual it’s clearly superior politically and economically to create homogenous nation states. For my people as for all other peoples. As a northern european, I prefer others of my kin don’t mix, and I want my people and civilization to survive, and prosper. Just as I do for all other peoples. As an individual, am certain that I don’t choose to mix (and I have tried). But as such I won’t choose for all other peoples. DEMONSTRATED PREFERENCE But I dont just talk about it – I demonstrated that I prefer to live in a traditional, religious, homogenous country. Although, I would prefer to live in old new england, or old england, or old normandy, old netherlands, or maybe old denmark if I could – since those are the origins of my people. But due to conquest by french, cosmopolitans, and marxists, I cannot do so. RECIPROCITY But I will not force the choice for others. Only prevent others from making the choice for me and those that agree with me. Any man who will work to help me make a nation for me and mine, I will by reciprocity help to make a nation for he and his. Any man who seeks to stop me and mine from creating a nation that provides the optimum for our kin interests is an enemy and I will work against him at the cost of my life and his. NATURAL LAW ON INVOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION Under natural law, heterogeneity is not a choice that is open to restitution (repair) and therefore involuntary imposition is against the law of nature and of men, and as such must be prosecuted, and the only restitution for genocide is genocide – a consequence for which western politicians should tremble and fear. All men who fight for nationalism are our brothers in arms. All others are merely obstacles to be ended. Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate. CRITICISM OF THE MAN IN THE MIRROR You have simple answers if you’re a simple person with simple responsibilities, particularly if you are only vaguely responsible for yourself. Those of us who are more sophisticated, more able, with wider affect, and broader responsibilities, who work to take responsibilities for tribe, nation, race, and mankind have more sophisticated answers. Don’t equate us other than in our interests. In my world I work for in the intersets of the common moral people, and against the interests of parasites and fools. ***Is that clear enough (you f-cking idiot). WN is trash because only fucking morons are stupid enough to take the short obvious, selfish, moron-route to political change.***

  • Stupid: The Short Obvious, Selfish, Moron-Route to Political Change

    —“What’s your position on mixing?”— Which question are you asking me? As a jurist of natural law? As a public intellectual practicing political economy seeking political solutions to optimum flourishing? Or as an anglo northern european man seeking the intersets of my people? Or as a man who loves his kinfolk first and foremost? As a jurist of natural law it is a question for a polity to choose mixing or not, since underclass mixing seems to be as beneficial as working, middle, and upper class race mixing is counter-productive. And as such the optimum conditions for all are to create many states, that produce commons that reflect the interests of the people who live in them. Nationalism is in the interests of all people. As a public intellectual it’s clearly superior politically and economically to create homogenous nation states. For my people as for all other peoples. As a northern european, I prefer others of my kin don’t mix, and I want my people and civilization to survive, and prosper. Just as I do for all other peoples. As an individual, am certain that I don’t choose to mix (and I have tried). But as such I won’t choose for all other peoples. DEMONSTRATED PREFERENCE But I dont just talk about it – I demonstrated that I prefer to live in a traditional, religious, homogenous country. Although, I would prefer to live in old new england, or old england, or old normandy, old netherlands, or maybe old denmark if I could – since those are the origins of my people. But due to conquest by french, cosmopolitans, and marxists, I cannot do so. RECIPROCITY But I will not force the choice for others. Only prevent others from making the choice for me and those that agree with me. Any man who will work to help me make a nation for me and mine, I will by reciprocity help to make a nation for he and his. Any man who seeks to stop me and mine from creating a nation that provides the optimum for our kin interests is an enemy and I will work against him at the cost of my life and his. NATURAL LAW ON INVOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION Under natural law, heterogeneity is not a choice that is open to restitution (repair) and therefore involuntary imposition is against the law of nature and of men, and as such must be prosecuted, and the only restitution for genocide is genocide – a consequence for which western politicians should tremble and fear. All men who fight for nationalism are our brothers in arms. All others are merely obstacles to be ended. Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate. CRITICISM OF THE MAN IN THE MIRROR You have simple answers if you’re a simple person with simple responsibilities, particularly if you are only vaguely responsible for yourself. Those of us who are more sophisticated, more able, with wider affect, and broader responsibilities, who work to take responsibilities for tribe, nation, race, and mankind have more sophisticated answers. Don’t equate us other than in our interests. In my world I work for in the intersets of the common moral people, and against the interests of parasites and fools. ***Is that clear enough (you f-cking idiot). WN is trash because only fucking morons are stupid enough to take the short obvious, selfish, moron-route to political change.***

  • Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have

    Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have a ‘country house’, even if it’s just a garden shed, or a cottage, and a couple of acres of land.

    How does that change the way of life?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 14:40:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020680015606960128

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling fami

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have a ‘country house’, even if it’s just a garden shed, or a cottage, and a couple of acres of land.

    How does that change the way of life?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 14:40:41 UTC

  • UNPLEASANT TRUTHS THE DEAD END RIGHT W.N. is a dead end. Nationalism is not. Nat

    UNPLEASANT TRUTHS

    THE DEAD END RIGHT

    W.N. is a dead end. Nationalism is not.

    National Socialism is a dead end. Redistribution is not.

    Religion is Dead End. Institutional models are not.

    Takeover is a dead end. Separatism is not.

    Demonstrations are a dead end. Direct action is not.

    Solving your problem is a dead end. Solving everyone’s is not.

    Ideology is a dead end. Economics Incentives Are Not.

    THE SOLUTIONS MOVEMENTS NEED

    All revolutions occur because of a convergence between:

    (a) the state’s inability to modify it’s behavior to serve the diverging interests of the public.

    (b) a common knowledge of an alternative condition (order) that would be preferable,

    (c) a surplus of males that are agitated by this condition,

    (d) an economic or political event that provides opportunity for collective action that can ‘spiral’ (increase in momentum).

    REALITIES OF MOVEMENTS

    The early adopters seek the fringe. The population seeks an Overton Window. As movements age, they upgrade members from the fringe to the Overton Window: Fringe personalities perform research for talented personalities that perform research for mainstream personalities.

    We have better followers this year than last.

    We had better followers last year than the year before.

    We had better followers the year before last, than the year before … and so on.

    I don’t want to associate with the fringe that hinders capture of the Overton Window. They are a dead end. All that matters is the people who will fight, resist, advocate, or not get in the way. And those people will be captured by economic and cultural incentives – not ideology.

    REVOLUTION

    A moral License.

    A set of Demands.

    A plan of Transition.

    A means of raising the cost of the status quo.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 17:54:00 UTC