If you took all the falsehood out of christianity then what would remain? – The mass (A lesson, an oath, a feast), festivals. – The extirpation of hatred from the human heart. – The exhaustion of interpersonal forgiveness as the optimum group cooperative strategy. – The demand for personal acts of charity. If you replace life after death with living a good life, persistence through actions, genetic persistence, and human transcendence of our descendents into the gods we imagine. If you replace lessons against the aristocracy in favor of diasporic pastoralists, and instead restored our original mythology os the trials of homer. If you restored the festivals with those of heroes, ancestors and the seasons (nature). If you add ethnocentrism (the optimum group strategy), government by rule of law and markets in everything (the optimum competitive strategy), and stoicism (the optimum mindfulness strategy). Then you have a religion free of lies. Church is a good thing. What one does there produces mindfulness. What one learns there can be truth or lie.
Theme: Reform
-
We Will Destroy Them Forever
We are going to destroy them you know: 1) Reinforce Trademarks, Eliminate Copyrights and Drastically limit patents. 2) Outlaw lying in the commons by involuntary liability and warranty of words. 3) De-financialize the credit system and eliminate consumer interest on consumer capital assets (residences and appliances and autos). 4) Eliminate the transportability (escape) of debt instruments while institutionalize the rights to income from it. 5) Reform shareholder laws to prevent hostile takeovers, and to equalize risk and exit. 6) Restructure taxation rates to reflect risk. Eliminate double taxation of dividends. This will have the effect of destroying nearly all manipulation of the population and all rent seeking. This will be the greatest competitive advantage since the invention of fiat credit. It means that there are no rents that allow you to escape the market – anywhere. Even at scale. Taxes for entrepreneurs, particularly small and medium businesses will nearly disappear. Huge reallocation of intellectual capital. Huge reduction in propaganda. Huge temporary expansion of courts and litigation until enough law accumulates on the books. STARVE THE BEAST.
-
We Will Destroy Them Forever
We are going to destroy them you know: 1) Reinforce Trademarks, Eliminate Copyrights and Drastically limit patents. 2) Outlaw lying in the commons by involuntary liability and warranty of words. 3) De-financialize the credit system and eliminate consumer interest on consumer capital assets (residences and appliances and autos). 4) Eliminate the transportability (escape) of debt instruments while institutionalize the rights to income from it. 5) Reform shareholder laws to prevent hostile takeovers, and to equalize risk and exit. 6) Restructure taxation rates to reflect risk. Eliminate double taxation of dividends. This will have the effect of destroying nearly all manipulation of the population and all rent seeking. This will be the greatest competitive advantage since the invention of fiat credit. It means that there are no rents that allow you to escape the market – anywhere. Even at scale. Taxes for entrepreneurs, particularly small and medium businesses will nearly disappear. Huge reallocation of intellectual capital. Huge reduction in propaganda. Huge temporary expansion of courts and litigation until enough law accumulates on the books. STARVE THE BEAST.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. WE WILL DESTROY THEM FOREVER We are going to
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
WE WILL DESTROY THEM FOREVER
We are going to destroy them you know:
1) Reinforce Trademarks, Eliminate Copyrights and Drastically limit patents.
2) Outlaw lying in the commons by involuntary liability and warranty of words.
3) De-financialize the credit system and eliminate consumer interest on consumer capital assets (residences and appliances and autos).
4) Eliminate the transportability (escape) of debt instruments while institutionalize the rights to income from it.
5) Reform shareholder laws to prevent hostile takeovers, and to equalize risk and exit.
6) Restructure taxation rates to reflect risk. Eliminate double taxation of dividends.
This will have the effect of destroying nearly all manipulation of the population and all rent seeking.
This will be the greatest competitive advantage since the invention of fiat credit.
It means that there are no rents that allow you to escape the market – anywhere. Even at scale.
Taxes for entrepreneurs, particularly small and medium businesses will nearly disappear.
Huge reallocation of intellectual capital.
Huge reduction in propaganda.
Huge temporary expansion of courts and litigation until enough law accumulates on the books.
STARVE THE BEAST.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 20:35:02 UTC
-
WE WILL DESTROY THEM FOREVER We are going to destroy them you know: 1) Reinforce
WE WILL DESTROY THEM FOREVER
We are going to destroy them you know:
1) Reinforce Trademarks, Eliminate Copyrights and Drastically limit patents.
2) Outlaw lying in the commons by involuntary liability and warranty of words.
3) De-financialize the credit system and eliminate consumer interest on consumer capital assets (residences and appliances and autos).
4) Eliminate the transportability (escape) of debt instruments while institutionalize the rights to income from it.
5) Reform shareholder laws to prevent hostile takeovers, and to equalize risk and exit.
6) Restructure taxation rates to reflect risk. Eliminate double taxation of dividends.
This will have the effect of destroying nearly all manipulation of the population and all rent seeking.
This will be the greatest competitive advantage since the invention of fiat credit.
It means that there are no rents that allow you to escape the market – anywhere. Even at scale.
Taxes for entrepreneurs, particularly small and medium businesses will nearly disappear.
Huge reallocation of intellectual capital.
Huge reduction in propaganda.
Huge temporary expansion of courts and litigation until enough law accumulates on the books.
STARVE THE BEAST.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 16:35:00 UTC
-
ENDORSEMENT: As an economist (not as a libertarian or conservative) I am endorsi
ENDORSEMENT:
As an economist (not as a libertarian or conservative) I am endorsing Bob Stefanowski for Governor of Connecticut.
I don’t usually get involved with ‘domestic disputes’ but this man is rock solid and his plan will rescue the state from collapse both demographic, economic, legal, and financial.
Connecticut, Massachusetts, and California are the three states where the left intellectuals (Yale, Harvard, Berkeley) were able to assert the greatest influence on policy due to the density of working class labor in the east, and the immigration wealth generated by the settlement and expansion of California.
California has such immigration demand due to the desirability of pacific coastal living, theincrease in asian port activity, and the movement of the tech sector from Boston to San Francisco.
Mass has partly corrected because the loss of the tech sector forced them to reorganize slowly since 1986.
Connecticut has not corrected for reasons that include extraordinary tax income from NYC revenues, but CT residency, and the continuous flight of industry from the state. (And the rather high minded puritanical virtue-cycle self-delusional character of new englanders ).
Connecticut has driven out anyone who can afford to leave. it has one asset and many liabilities. The asset is the territory itself which is an extremely desirable bit of greenery and rolling hills that make residential life … idyllic. The liability is that it’s populated with sh_t-holes from Springfield MA, south to Windsor, Bloomfield, Hartford, East Hartford, Manchester, Willimantic, Norwich, Newington, New Britain, Bristol, Waterbury, Wallingford, North Haven, Hamden, New Haven, Milford and Bridgeport.
Basically everything within five miles of the north-south corridor is a sh_t-hole. Every small town on the other hand is a remnant of ‘little england’ and it’s migration to ‘new england’.
This cannot be fixed without either radical exit of the working and underclasses (unlikely), or radical entry of SCIENTIFIC higher education (my idea), and radical attraction of wealthy settlers (coasts), and radical attraction of business.
This Candidate may or may not succeed. But he is the real deal when it comes to finance, economics, and taxes.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 12:33:00 UTC
-
“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project?
—“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution. The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory. The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book. This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law. What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure. And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected… The clock ticks, the world turns, the window opens, anger burns.
-
“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project?
—“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution. The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory. The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book. This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law. What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure. And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected… The clock ticks, the world turns, the window opens, anger burns.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Curt does your book include a new constit
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
—“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark
Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution.
The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory.
The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book.
This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law.
What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure.
And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected…
The clock ticks,
the world turns,
the window opens,
anger burns.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 13:56:23 UTC
-
yep. After 4th grade (10), if not in 4th grade, teachers should come exclusively
yep. After 4th grade (10), if not in 4th grade, teachers should come exclusively from people with successful life experience (parents, grandparents). this also kill the unions and tenure.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 00:13:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012126742708965377
Reply addressees: @3Spooki5u @MartialSociety @SelimSeesYou
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012073870772396032
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012073870772396032