—“Is ordoliberalism an effective economic theory in your opinion? Why/why not?”— https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism THE CORRECT ANSWER Ordoliberalism refers to the state-private alliance used by Germans after world war two. The premise is for the state to extend the market such that it provides desired goods and services rather than to take over the market for the production of goods and services. Ordoliberalism (geramn) differs from classical liberalism (anglo) just as continental law (german/french) differs from common law (anglo), in that the anglo seeks to suppress the state’s interference in the market (optimistic), and the german seeks to guard and manage the market (pragmatic to pessimistic). The anglo model is Imperial and expansionist (seizing all growth opportunities), and the german is domestic (maximizing known wants). The principle issue here is (a) demographic and (b) cultural. You can only conduct the german model with a martial (professional) bureaucracy and very honest people (farming). You can only conduct the anglo model when innovation is accessible (sail, piracy, conquest). So again, there is no ‘best’ model of government, there are only organizations that satisfy wants, needs, and exploit opportunities. The german postwar model was somewhat like the Chinese postwar model, and that is when you are ‘behind’ and want to ‘catch up’ it is a problem of organization. When you are ‘ahead’ and want to ‘stay ahead’ it’s a problem of innovation. The german model would be ‘bad’ for imperial purposes, and ‘good’ for postwar purposes. Germans are unique because of superior and homogeneous genetics, superior political culture due to lack of a central state, superior culture due to mastering craftsmanship for production of quality products, and the professionalization of the bureaucracy in imitation of Frederick the Great – and the subsequent investment in technical education that allowed Germany to produce the scientific (rather than British empirical) revolution – from which the postwar era has so soundly benefitted. In other words, the Germans and the Japanese both pursued superior export goods as a postwar strategy – and they COULD because of genetic(demographic) and cultural superiority. This is not a strategy all peoples can pursue – they lack the genetics, culture, and institutions to do so. As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary economic advantage any culture can seek is demographic. This will exacerbate over the next century such that smaller states with superior demographics will constantly outperform larger states with worse demographics. The people you live with have greater influence on your potential than do your abilities.
Theme: Reform
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. JOHN MARK ON MARKETING MARKET FASCISM AS THE
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
JOHN MARK ON MARKETING MARKET FASCISM AS THE NEXT STEP IN DEMOCRACY
—“As we market/promote a new and improved governmental system with propertarian/natural law tenets etc, is it wiser to speak of it (market/promote/educate) as “a new form of democracy” (and explain the part about houses/markets etc), or to call it something else (because obviously full franchise democracy doesn’t work, and we don’t want people thinking it will be full franchise direct democracy).”— John Mark
Well I think of it as market democracy rather than monopoly democracy and if we explain that it solves the problem of either side winning only the moral will agree and only the immoral disagree.
And then we know who to exit from the polity: the immoral.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 20:15:14 UTC
-
John Mark on Marketing Market Fascism as The Next Step in Democracy
—“As we market/promote a new and improved governmental system with propertarian/natural law tenets etc, is it wiser to speak of it (market/promote/educate) as “a new form of democracy” (and explain the part about houses/markets etc), or to call it something else (because obviously full franchise democracy doesn’t work, and we don’t want people thinking it will be full franchise direct democracy).”— John Mark Well I think of it as market democracy rather than monopoly democracy and if we explain that it solves the problem of either side winning only the moral will agree and only the immoral disagree. And then we know who to exit from the polity: the immoral.
-
John Mark on Marketing Market Fascism as The Next Step in Democracy
—“As we market/promote a new and improved governmental system with propertarian/natural law tenets etc, is it wiser to speak of it (market/promote/educate) as “a new form of democracy” (and explain the part about houses/markets etc), or to call it something else (because obviously full franchise democracy doesn’t work, and we don’t want people thinking it will be full franchise direct democracy).”— John Mark Well I think of it as market democracy rather than monopoly democracy and if we explain that it solves the problem of either side winning only the moral will agree and only the immoral disagree. And then we know who to exit from the polity: the immoral.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link. Retweeted The Nationalist â (@Nationalist7346):
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
Retweeted The Nationalist â (@Nationalist7346):
Let us make a government that does not require voting or even politicians. Where markets can be used or created to replace a voting referendum, they must. We need a market for the production of commons. Remove that monopoly from the govt and it will all click into place. ð DT.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 12:11:06 UTC
-
THOUGHTS ON THE GERMAN POSTWAR THEORY: ORDOLIBERALISM —“Is ordoliberalism an e
THOUGHTS ON THE GERMAN POSTWAR THEORY: ORDOLIBERALISM
—“Is ordoliberalism an effective economic theory in your opinion? Why/why not?”—
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism
THE CORRECT ANSWER
Ordoliberalism refers to the state-private alliance used by Germans after world war two. The premise is for the state to extend the market such that it provides desired goods and services rather than to take over the market for the production of goods and services.
Ordoliberalism (geramn) differs from classical liberalism (anglo) just as continental law (german/french) differs from common law (anglo), in that the anglo seeks to suppress the state’s interference in the market (optimistic), and the german seeks to guard and manage the market (pragmatic to pessimistic).
The anglo model is Imperial and expansionist (seizing all growth opportunities), and the german is domestic (maximizing known wants).
The principle issue here is (a) demographic and (b) cultural. You can only conduct the german model with a martial (professional) bureaucracy and very honest people (farming). You can only conduct the anglo model when innovation is accessible (sail, piracy, conquest).
So again, there is no ‘best’ model of government, there are only organizations that satisfy wants, needs, and exploit opportunities.
The german postwar model was somewhat like the Chinese postwar model, and that is when you are ‘behind’ and want to ‘catch up’ it is a problem of organization. When you are ‘ahead’ and want to ‘stay ahead’ it’s a problem of innovation. The german model would be ‘bad’ for imperial purposes, and ‘good’ for postwar purposes.
Germans are unique because of superior and homogeneous genetics, superior political culture due to lack of a central state, superior culture due to mastering craftsmanship for production of quality products, and the professionalization of the bureaucracy in imitation of Frederick the Great – and the subsequent investment in technical education that allowed Germany to produce the scientific (rather than British empirical) revolution – from which the postwar era has so soundly benefitted. In other words, the Germans and the Japanese both pursued superior export goods as a postwar strategy – and they COULD because of genetic(demographic) and cultural superiority. This is not a strategy all peoples can pursue – they lack the genetics, culture, and institutions to do so.
As I’ve said repeatedly, and will continue to, the primary economic advantage any culture can seek is demographic. This will exacerbate over the next century such that smaller states with superior demographics will constantly outperform larger states with worse demographics. The people you live with have greater influence on your potential than do your abilities.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 11:10:00 UTC
-
Movement
Yes, there are people who attempted to co-opt me and my work for use by the degenerate right. Yes I used them as long as it was valuable. Yes it was probably a bad trade in the long term. Yes they are gone. Yes they are still coopting some of my work. No it doesn’t matter. Why? A boys club of the unaccomplished, undesirable, and mentally weak cannot scale. What can scale is practical incentives, and possible solutions. I don’t for a minute think that techies and nerds make much difference other than repeaters. What matters is the men who will fight for fun and profit, and the a sufficient body of the population that will not resist or object to the solution.
-
Movement
Yes, there are people who attempted to co-opt me and my work for use by the degenerate right. Yes I used them as long as it was valuable. Yes it was probably a bad trade in the long term. Yes they are gone. Yes they are still coopting some of my work. No it doesn’t matter. Why? A boys club of the unaccomplished, undesirable, and mentally weak cannot scale. What can scale is practical incentives, and possible solutions. I don’t for a minute think that techies and nerds make much difference other than repeaters. What matters is the men who will fight for fun and profit, and the a sufficient body of the population that will not resist or object to the solution.
-
Revolution: “the Plan”
(repost from september 2015) Western Man is moral man, and moral men need: 1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.) 2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.) 3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.) 4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors). 5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (We need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set. And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service. One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
Revolution: “the Plan”
(repost from september 2015) Western Man is moral man, and moral men need: 1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.) 2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.) 3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.) 4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors). 5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (We need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set. And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service. One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine