Theme: Reform

  • The Full Circle of Currency

    Currency Started as Debt Tokens, and has returned to debt tokens. Under P-Constitutional reforms, the cycle will be complete.  Although more technically they are shares in the state or economy, issued in print, coin, or digital record as currency, and functioning as debt tokens.  Familiar Analogy: you go to the amusement park. You buy tokens from the park. You redeem the tokens for rides and games. The owners of rides and games redeem tickets with the park owners. The purpose in this case is to ensure the park owners get their cut (tax, fee), because the incentive to skim (clip coins) is eliminated. Reversing the familiar analogy: you buy from a merchant on credit, the state issues debt tokens (currency) to you. And you later pay the debt plus a fee using those tokens, and the state redistributes them.  The present problem is that it’s not the state (you) collecting the fees for having borrowed from yourself. Instead, the state should largely exist by finance and credit that is largely privatized against the interests of the people.

    • by Bill Joslin –
      From what I understand currency evolved for debt tracking before it was used for trade. It served as an in-group tally of debts within small communities that distributed resources and only engaged in formal trade across groups). (Greaber’s Debt)
      Oddly we’ve come full circle with currency created when debts are issued.

    -by Paul Franklin – Coinage, then, might have been an attempt to create professional armies to avoid paying them through plunder? Philanthropic. Paper money, according to Ezra Pound, was ‘philanthropic’ invention of a Chinese Emperor in a drought, issued to the starving illiterate peasants that they might buy enough of the grain they grew from the Barons who kept it, and not die. The barons redeem the paper for the promise of gold declared for their presentation before the Emperor.  

  • The Full Circle of Currency

    Currency Started as Debt Tokens, and has returned to debt tokens. Under P-Constitutional reforms, the cycle will be complete.  Although more technically they are shares in the state or economy, issued in print, coin, or digital record as currency, and functioning as debt tokens.  Familiar Analogy: you go to the amusement park. You buy tokens from the park. You redeem the tokens for rides and games. The owners of rides and games redeem tickets with the park owners. The purpose in this case is to ensure the park owners get their cut (tax, fee), because the incentive to skim (clip coins) is eliminated. Reversing the familiar analogy: you buy from a merchant on credit, the state issues debt tokens (currency) to you. And you later pay the debt plus a fee using those tokens, and the state redistributes them.  The present problem is that it’s not the state (you) collecting the fees for having borrowed from yourself. Instead, the state should largely exist by finance and credit that is largely privatized against the interests of the people.

    • by Bill Joslin –
      From what I understand currency evolved for debt tracking before it was used for trade. It served as an in-group tally of debts within small communities that distributed resources and only engaged in formal trade across groups). (Greaber’s Debt)
      Oddly we’ve come full circle with currency created when debts are issued.

    -by Paul Franklin – Coinage, then, might have been an attempt to create professional armies to avoid paying them through plunder? Philanthropic. Paper money, according to Ezra Pound, was ‘philanthropic’ invention of a Chinese Emperor in a drought, issued to the starving illiterate peasants that they might buy enough of the grain they grew from the Barons who kept it, and not die. The barons redeem the paper for the promise of gold declared for their presentation before the Emperor.  

  • I don’t see any center. I see the end of democracy for certain, and the only que

    I don’t see any center. I see the end of democracy for certain, and the only question is how many people end up dead in the process.

    (And that’s why I’ve been working on a solution for more than a decade.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 22:13:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231341368393584640

    Reply addressees: @razibkhan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231341126080225280


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @razibkhan The last chance we had was ’92 – and … Perot.
    If not for immigration we would have been able to survive waves of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human-science denial, as well as the deconstruction of the military, and bush was the most knowledgeable internationalist.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1231341126080225280

  • I don’t think you get it – do you? That’s the idea. Drain the Swamp

    I don’t think you get it – do you?
    That’s the idea.
    Drain the Swamp.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 00:04:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229919614945124352

    Reply addressees: @barr_chicken @matthewamiller @TheJusticeDept

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229849033264504832

  • Wait till we reform justice and start coming after your side of the fence. We’ll

    Wait till we reform justice and start coming after your side of the fence. We’ll have to build new prisons.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 00:03:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229919461299322890

    Reply addressees: @matthewamiller

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229848487015124993

  • CRITICIZING AND REFORMING “LOGOS” I disagree with every use of Logos I’ve ever s

    CRITICIZING AND REFORMING “LOGOS”

    I disagree with every use of Logos I’ve ever seen.

    As far as I know it’s original use meant ‘order identifiable and explicable through reason’. Which doesn’t tell us anything, unless we have some claim on the truth or falsehood of it.

    Instead, civilizations evolve strategies (group competitive strategies), and persist them through metaphysical (unstated, presumed, unconscious) premises(laws of nature), and paradigms (plots), advanced by archetypes (characters) that anthropomorphize (mirror and amplify psychological or behavioral traits), which recursively reinforce the group strategy as if it is a law of nature.

    For this reason I argue that metaphysics as a discipline ‘doesn’t exist’ so to speak and that there is only one testifiable answer to existence (realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, rational choice, reciprocity, transcendence) and that all else is fiction(parable, myth, literature) or fictionalism (theology, sophistry, pseudoscience) that either mirrors or does not mirror that most parsimonious testimony and strategy.

    Man must act. To act he must remember. With memory he must predict futures to choose from to act upon. To choose from those futures he must reason. To continuously improve his choices continuously reducing costs, he must improve his reason. To reason at any scale other than the trivial requires forms of categorizing, organizing, predicting, and calculating. Language allows us to calculate increasing complexity. Cooperation lets us produce disproportionate returns on our actions. Cooperation on increasingly complex production requires collective ends within which to discover cooperative means. Narratives allow us to calculate collective means of cooperation within complex social groups. Complex social groups using the same narratives make the majority of tie-breaking decisions in favor of the group strategy. It is the countless decisions we make in favor of the group strategy when it costs little or nothing to do so, or at least the not-prohibitive to do so, that produce our group strategy more than does any organized and intentional production of commons.

    So I don’t use “logos” because of it’s nonsense connotations. Instead I create an operational description of the world and therefore continue my war on nonsense terms from history that were invented to wow nonsensical ignorant people into the pretense that some presumed good was in fact true as well as presumed good.

    See what I did there?

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 09:11:00 UTC

  • If you start thinking, you’ll get it. That’s why the P-constitution nationalizes

    If you start thinking, you’ll get it. That’s why the P-constitution nationalizes the fed, consumer credit, pensions, starts the singapore method, and limits 4yr Uni to STEM+L. That’s how it was done. Universities, Credit, and Stacking the vote with Immigration: depopulation.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-15 02:35:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228508072374657026

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter @hbdchick

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228507054731599873

  • Educate, Don’t Compromise

    Educate, Don’t Compromise https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/educate-dont-compromise/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:49:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228345594219057153

  • Educate, Don’t Compromise

    Feb 12, 2020, 11:43 AM [D]o not compromise because of people’s ignorance. Educate. We have to reverse the entire Marxist, Cultural Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist, Multiculturalist, Denialist era of false promise, baiting into hazard, as a means of destroying the market between the classes, the rule of law of reciprocity, and the myths, history, traditions, that made our civilization possible. Yes. Heroism, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Monarchy, Cabinet, Senate, Industry, Commons, and Dependents (Church), and markets in everything where we suppress the reproduction of the unproductive and divert the proceeds to the production of intergenerational continuously capitalizing commons. If you want socialism, then leave. you have a whole world willing to take you. If you want western civilization and the proceeds of it, then there is only one country left to have it. And we are going to keep it, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you.

  • Educate, Don’t Compromise

    Feb 12, 2020, 11:43 AM [D]o not compromise because of people’s ignorance. Educate. We have to reverse the entire Marxist, Cultural Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist, Multiculturalist, Denialist era of false promise, baiting into hazard, as a means of destroying the market between the classes, the rule of law of reciprocity, and the myths, history, traditions, that made our civilization possible. Yes. Heroism, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Monarchy, Cabinet, Senate, Industry, Commons, and Dependents (Church), and markets in everything where we suppress the reproduction of the unproductive and divert the proceeds to the production of intergenerational continuously capitalizing commons. If you want socialism, then leave. you have a whole world willing to take you. If you want western civilization and the proceeds of it, then there is only one country left to have it. And we are going to keep it, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you.