Theme: Reform

  • OUR PROPOSAL IS HARD TO REFUSE P-Constitution, it’s nationalization of consumer

    OUR PROPOSAL IS HARD TO REFUSE

    P-Constitution, it’s nationalization of consumer credit, and its prohibitions on rent seeking, will destroy the entire rent seeking structure of the western economies, preserving only those investments that contribute to production.

    The entire insurance industry, mortgage industry, credit card industry, and any business that makes it’s money from credit rather than production and sale of goods and services will collapse with all the wealth retained by the laboring, working, and middle classes.

    The Concentration of wealth in DC, NY and via New York to Hollywood/LA will vaporize within months. Investors will flee to Assets.

    The prohibition on baiting into hazard, and the institution of involuntary warranty; the liability for testimonial speech in public, restoration of defamation, and the extension of defamation to defense of the commons; and the loss of copyright protection other than creative commons will collapse the media and advertising business as they desperately seek to reform.

    Capital will seek safety first, then alliance with the treasury on investments, and the states will have no alternative than to follow germany, japan, and south korea into competing with china on tech, and depriving china of its market.

    The requirement for right to repair and limits to labor arbitrage will restore european markets.

    The distribution of liquidity directly to citizens to maintain spending, and the deprivation of ‘undesirables’ from this distribution will drive them out of the market.

    This strategy amounts to paying off the middle to destroy the top and bottom.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 18:10:00 UTC

  • Why do we need to win over hand writing effeminate pacifists? Why does your opin

    Why do we need to win over hand writing effeminate pacifists? Why does your opinion matter? Anyone who will fight for our cause, will care more about achieving liberty to determine our future regardless of the reason we practice christian ethics than making excuses for why.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:44:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225082833674391554

    Reply addressees: @AutisticArchiv1 @WolfishHead

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225075141199237120


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225075141199237120

  • Propertarianism has nothing to do with religion. HOwever, as a second project I

    Propertarianism has nothing to do with religion. HOwever, as a second project I do work on religious reform.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 14:15:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225060310110932992

    Reply addressees: @AutisticArchiv1 @ClownBa73413423 @JohnMarkSays @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225054106039001089


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225054106039001089

  • WHY WILL NEW LAWS WORK? —-“My point is how is a new set of laws going to chang

    WHY WILL NEW LAWS WORK?

    —-“My point is how is a new set of laws going to change human nature? We are a nation of many different peoples with many different religions , cultures and morals.

    What one group of people see as acceptable another group sees as unacceptable.

    I do agree that whatever laws we have , and few they should be, should apply equally to everyone regardless of any status.”—John Lafferty

    GOOD QUESTION

    1) Under the natural law, we are each sovereigns (kings of different countries). Our contract with one another is an alliance that insures one another’s sovereignty. That is our ‘social contact’- it’s not social at all. It’s military. As such we are all equal before the law, because the law is nothing more than reciprocal insurance of one another’s sovereignty, and therefor the requirement for reciprocity in all interactions; and that in any violation of reciprocity, they may request defense restitution and punishment from the allies. So we are unequal in ability, unequal in value to one another, equal under the law, and equally insured. But we are sovereign, autonomous mini-countries, with each man, woman, and children and their land the smallest possible nation.

    2) Natural law is a description of human nature. It is the MOST descriptive of human nature. Reciprocity is the same as the law of thermodynamics – but with our memory we can create credits(give help) and debts(receive help) with one another: But reciprocity is unavoidable because people demonstrably spend heavily on punishing irreciprocity – both interpersonally by retaliation, judicially by restitution, and socially by what we call altruistic punishment.

    3) No, while people WANT differently, people all see irreciprocity equally: bad. They see proportionality differently. In other words, the right sees capitalizing, meritocracy, hierarchy and reciprocity more important than proportionality, and the left sees consumption, equidistribution, equality, and proportionality more important than reciprocity.

    This is just an expression of cognitive differences in development since these reflect female consumptive short term dysgenic, and male capitalizing long term eugenic strategies.

    4) Given that we express different strategic demands, under the same natural law we can separate and pursue our different strategies (and the left will die off), or we can be eradicated by the left and all die off in another dark age, or we can eradicate the left and transcend man into the gods we imagine.

    The only solutions are separation to produce our commons, conquest, or failure.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 12:41:00 UTC

  • WHY I WAS RIGHT ABOUT RICHMOND REFORMING THE FAILURE OF C’VILLE – WIN THE WAR NO

    WHY I WAS RIGHT ABOUT RICHMOND REFORMING THE FAILURE OF C’VILLE – WIN THE WAR NOT THE BATTLE

    by Tim Kirby via The Strategic Culture Foundation

    (“On Counter Color Revolutions”)

    There have been many protests all over the world on a large scale since the beginning of the 24 hour news cycle/prevalence of the Internet and it has become obvious that some quickly gain favored status from the Mainstream Media while others are kept in the dark regardless of size or significance. This selective hyper focus on particular protests is a key component of the Color Revolution strategy. The protestors are positioned as the downtrodden masses yearning for their voices to be heard, and bad country of the month’s leadership is oppressive and needs to go. Sometimes this works (Ukraine twice and Georgia) and other times it fails (Russia and for now at least Venezuela) but the Second Amendment (2A) protest in Virginia presents a new tactic/opportunity that can be used to counteract any Color Revolution outside the West.

    One thing that is key to understanding Color Revolutions (CR) is that as it stands today they are always orchestrated by the West to make regime change in the Non-West due to their financial and nearly total media domination. No matter how many people label the Mainstream Media as “Dinosaur” or quote their terrible ratings, the 24 hour news cycle still creates the dominant narrative for current events in the public’s mind internationally, and this is why the Color Revolution tactic only works one way.

    The Western Mainstream Media can turn any nobody politician\public figure into the legitimate leader of Country X overnight. No one knew who Guaido was on Monday, but the West was sure he was the only true voice of the Venezuelan people on Tuesday. The same goes for the overwhelming support for anyone opposed to Putin like Alexei Navalny, who if given the chance to run for President would surely get a low end single digit percentage.

    The Mainstream Media can make heroes and villains abroad but this does not work in the opposite direction. When Jill Stein (a figure with the same relative level of popularity as Navalny if not more so) was thrown out of the 2016 debate when she tried to crash the party, no non-Western media could spin this into the catalyst for some sort of Color Revolution. If this would have happened in say Iran then calls for the overthrow of the government would be heard from TV screens and Facebook memes around the world.

    Although the Russians are accused of meddling in the Yellow-Vest protests, there is simply not enough Moscow Media might to convince the French public that the Yellow vesters are the new legitimate power, wag that dog, and get a full scale Color Revolution completed. The French situation is a perfect breeding ground for a Color Revolution if it was in bad guy Country X. The level of protests are massive, police brutality is rampant and documented, and they even have a Color/symbol – their vests. All the ingredients are there but without being able to push the media narrative no CR can or will happen in France.

    What this means is that for the foreseeable future the Multipolar non-Western World (Russia, China, Iran etc.) is always going to be on the defensive from CR tactics. There is however another major disadvantage that the Multipolar World has – the type of people who do go out to street protests are the type who support the Monopolar World.

    The working masses of families with kids, the heartlanders across the globe, who are really the backbone of society are far too tired/busy to engage in Color Revolutions or protests of any kind, and when they do they are one off and utter failures. The actual people who are most likely to protest with ribbons because of vague complaints like a lack of “Democracy” or “freedom” are those emotional types with time on their hands and probably decent resources too.

    Naive bourgeois victimhood-lifestyle teenagers and some hardcore professional activists are generally who you are going to find at CRs. The amount of people who are actual ideologues that push political agendas in their country are generally less than 1% of the population combined with trendy kids who want to feel like they are accomplishing something by chanting do not represent the will of the working-class majority. But as stated before the Mainstream Media can convince even simple folk in Country X that they do. And probably what is most important, the trendy people with free time are always inherently pro-Western. It is exactly the cosmopolitan urbanites in any country who are going to be pro-Western, farmers and factory workers usually won’t. The type of people who come out to a Color Revolution are the types who believe the US/EU hype, and are the willful useful idiots that the media needs to create its narrative.

    And here is where the Virginia 2A protests come in. They, like the Yellow Vest protestors were made up of those toiling masses also known as the Silent Majority. The same Silent Majority which the Multipolar world wants to woo with calls for tradition, populism and national sovereignty. Meaning, that ideologically the Second Amendment crowd’s instincts are anti-Color Revolution even if they don’t know what that term means. They are the kind of folks who cherish America as an idea and as part of their identity. They want their traditions and culture to remain intact, meaning that this is really the forces that the leadership of Country X (that is under threat of Color Revolution) should use. This is a demonstration of just how strong the Silent Majority really is when it awakes from its slumber of fatigue.

    The local government was terrified and declared a state of emergency even before the protest began and obviously, the SJW rats didn’t dare show their faces against hundreds of armed old school Americans. This show of force that didn’t use any particular force is a shining example of how strong the people the Multipolar Order supposedly loves, and we can see how much they could halt some kind of anti-American CR.

    To an extent this is what happened in Venezuela when Maduro was able to successfully rally thousands of supporters to march. If in Caracas the media had footage of massed government troops on the move, beating people with clubs, it would have fed into Maduro’s downfall, but since the actual force that took over the streets were just working class normies in bright T-shirts there was not only to juicy footage to twist, the images proved to support Maduro’s legitimacy. The real winner of this situation was Maduro’s usage of the Silent Majority directly against the Color Revolutionaries. He showed a faith in his people, which is not felt in places like Russia or China. Despite the fact that the Multipolar World stands on the side of tradition on populism, the big two dominant forces in this movement do not let their populaces take action like Maduro was wise enough to allow.

    If hordes of armed commoners like those at the Virginia protests showed up to the Maidan it would have never have succeeded. Instead in Ukraine they stayed home as 40,000 protestors decided the destiny of 40 million people. Although China is accused of sending thugs from the Mainland, if they were to send waves of semi-armed hillbillies into Hong Kong the issue would be resolved in a day. The simple fact is that those who are on the Multipolar side of today’s New Cold War, if given the chance to fight on the streets, will win that fight every time. They are the side with the most to lose, the most anger to vent, the most testosterone, the most love for their own way of life, and who suffer the most from Color Revolutions.

    Maduro demonstrated that organizing the peasantry even with just their fists and improvised weapons, was enough to defeat years of Color Revolution prep, especially since his masses did not look at like soldiers in disguise. He had the legit support of countless thousands of normal people. The Virginia 2A protest showed that the trendies who are the poster children of CR movements will go absolutely silent the second there is a threat of real violence. Antifa is happy to use their Black Block against one man in a MAGA hat but when it comes to actually dying for their beliefs they sit at home. Word warfare, Twitter terrorism and Media manipulation are the strengths of the Monopolar World, but ultimately the people that this system breeds are not willing to fight (in the direct literal sense) for their values and will lose through preemptive capitulation in the face of actual direct force.

    If those who claim they are fighting for a Multipolar World Order do not have more faith in their populace then they will become Yanokoviches and not Maduros. Footage of government troops fighting protestors can spell doom for any leader, while the same direct action being taken by thousands of uniformless out-of-shape factory workers acting semi-independently feeds the Mainstream Media nothing and in fact strengthens one’s own legitimacy – it shows the people are on your side.

    To be clear this is NOT a call for violence, in fact it is quite the opposite. Some of the most deadly events in human history have been Revolutions. Meaning, that if someone really cares about the lives of commoners they should not advocate for overthrowing governments, but for incremental change.

    If the Maidan had been solved by rednecks smashing up the camps in Kiev, yes some people would have died, perhaps tens or hundreds at the most, but to date thousands have been killed and millions have suffered thanks to the successful Color Revolution of 2014. The war in the Donbass still continues many years on. Even if you loved the ideas the Yeltsin tried to push on Russia the fact is that the shattering of the Soviet Union caused millions of deaths, reform of the Soviet Union would have been far preferable from a humanitarian standpoint. If we think about the great revolutionary periods in human history, in France, Russia, China etc. they were all followed by grand scale violence and counter-revolutionary crackdown. Using the Silent Majority to block upcoming CR tactics is a far more humane solution than it may sound on the surface.

    If the Multipolar World wants to survive it has to activate its Silent Majority to protect itself from Color Revolution tactics. It is ironically the populists who in many ways seem too terrified to allow their heartlanders to have the freedom to take action and fight for the motherland without a uniform and direct orders from on high.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/virginia-2a-protest-model-counter-color-revolution?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 09:21:00 UTC

  • Yes P is a universalist program. It says that all people can transcend ignorance

    Yes P is a universalist program. It says that all people can transcend ignorance, superstition, fraud, baiting into hazard, rent seeking, organized crime, corruption, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, conversion, immigration, conquest if they adopt P-rule of law with universal standing in the commons, state-private capital investment, state consumer credit, and SOFT EUGENICS. But that if you don’t adopt soft eugenics and rule of law then you will not be able to do any of the above with any degree of certainty for any substantial period of time. P is just physics applied to social science.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 20:13:00 UTC

  • You can join us and create a new generation of founding fathers to correct both

    You can join us and create a new generation of founding fathers to correct both left and right error, or you can continue infantilism – the religion undermining and destruction.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 16:13:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224365305855692802

    Reply addressees: @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224365067648618496


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump So who is childish? The definition of insanity is not learning from failure but continuous doubling down despite failure.

    Democracy was a god and a religion that failed. Marxism, postmodernism, and feminism were a pseudoscientific religion that failed. Only invasion won.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224365067648618496


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump So who is childish? The definition of insanity is not learning from failure but continuous doubling down despite failure.

    Democracy was a god and a religion that failed. Marxism, postmodernism, and feminism were a pseudoscientific religion that failed. Only invasion won.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224365067648618496

  • So who is childish? The definition of insanity is not learning from failure but

    So who is childish? The definition of insanity is not learning from failure but continuous doubling down despite failure.

    Democracy was a god and a religion that failed. Marxism, postmodernism, and feminism were a pseudoscientific religion that failed. Only invasion won.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 16:12:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224365067648618496

    Reply addressees: @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224364696553316353


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump I am not interested in REPEATING DECADES OF FAILURE, when it is just the import of bodies not discourse or education that has created the divide.

    The demographics are done. It’s passed that point. The left successfully used undermining and immigration to do what ideas couldn’t.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224364696553316353


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump I am not interested in REPEATING DECADES OF FAILURE, when it is just the import of bodies not discourse or education that has created the divide.

    The demographics are done. It’s passed that point. The left successfully used undermining and immigration to do what ideas couldn’t.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224364696553316353

  • WE AREN’T SEEKING CONVERTS by Luke Weinhagen We are looking for those that recog

    WE AREN’T SEEKING CONVERTS

    by Luke Weinhagen

    We are looking for those that recognize our solution, and have any desire at all to address the issues while we have any say in what the solutions look like.

    We are not recruiting. Recruiting and converting gives the impression we need you.

    We don’t. You need us.



    CD: We are seeking founding fathers.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 14:09:00 UTC

  • No, I have done what I promised I would: a moral license, a set of demands, a pl

    No, I have done what I promised I would: a moral license, a set of demands, a plan of transition, and a means of altering the status quo. It is legal in the USA (unlike other countries) to do everything but organize action on the last. That does not mean it doesn’t exist.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 03:36:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224174819106861057

    Reply addressees: @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224170033846325248


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224170033846325248