Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reform

  • The P-Constitution is for USA, European Civ, and Humanity

    —“Is the Propertarian Constitution, only for the United States of America or all of North America and Europe?”—

    [A] general constitution, with customizations for the american reformation. It is for any country in western civilization (Or any civilization) – presuming customizations. The political structure – means of producing acts – will vary most depending upon the tastes of the population. And the possible choices are listed. We tend to think government is the subject we should focus on, but it’s really the law, then the economy, then the government. Hopefully our constitution corrects this problem and refocuses us on the law and economics – even though our concept of economics is balance sheet rather than income statement driven so includes culture etc. It’s structured as: – The Complaint: The reason for the reformation. – Strategy: the ‘tradition’ of european peoples that explains the entire social system. – The Law: the law that expresses that tradition (definitions, the law, rights and obligations) – The Constitution: the constitution proper, that describes the function of every institution political, social, and familial. It’s possible each country(kingdom), or federation(empire) might want to modify these as they see fit. – The Acts: Actions that are specific to the american experiment. Every country or group of countries would replace these and add their own acts – The Restitutions: the “restitutions and punishments for crimes against our people”: Every country would replace and add their own restitutions and punishments.

  • The P-Constitution is for USA, European Civ, and Humanity

    —“Is the Propertarian Constitution, only for the United States of America or all of North America and Europe?”—

    [A] general constitution, with customizations for the american reformation. It is for any country in western civilization (Or any civilization) – presuming customizations. The political structure – means of producing acts – will vary most depending upon the tastes of the population. And the possible choices are listed. We tend to think government is the subject we should focus on, but it’s really the law, then the economy, then the government. Hopefully our constitution corrects this problem and refocuses us on the law and economics – even though our concept of economics is balance sheet rather than income statement driven so includes culture etc. It’s structured as: – The Complaint: The reason for the reformation. – Strategy: the ‘tradition’ of european peoples that explains the entire social system. – The Law: the law that expresses that tradition (definitions, the law, rights and obligations) – The Constitution: the constitution proper, that describes the function of every institution political, social, and familial. It’s possible each country(kingdom), or federation(empire) might want to modify these as they see fit. – The Acts: Actions that are specific to the american experiment. Every country or group of countries would replace these and add their own acts – The Restitutions: the “restitutions and punishments for crimes against our people”: Every country would replace and add their own restitutions and punishments.

  • RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION

    RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION by Maria Al Masani Makienko ( FROM CURT: Learn Please. I will delete all counter-signaling.) As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management. The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P? — by CurtD: It can be updated with P. But I didn’t think through the universal application of aristotle in doing so until you just mentioned it. (FYI: @adam … wth is Adam’s alias now?) — by Maria Al Masani Makienko They as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. Every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass — by CurtD: Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” ARISTOTLE I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. But I think you have given me the right wisdom: that if I start with aristotle then all will follow. @adam (Don Miguel) suggested this last year I just didn’t piece it together until you said it here. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can.

  • RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION

    RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION by Maria Al Masani Makienko ( FROM CURT: Learn Please. I will delete all counter-signaling.) As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management. The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P? — by CurtD: It can be updated with P. But I didn’t think through the universal application of aristotle in doing so until you just mentioned it. (FYI: @adam … wth is Adam’s alias now?) — by Maria Al Masani Makienko They as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. Every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass — by CurtD: Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” ARISTOTLE I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. But I think you have given me the right wisdom: that if I start with aristotle then all will follow. @adam (Don Miguel) suggested this last year I just didn’t piece it together until you said it here. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can.

  • It is possible to update our laws to prohibit unwarranted speech, false promise,

    It is possible to update our laws to prohibit unwarranted speech, false promise, baiting into hazard, and undermining of the commons.

    Most of my (our) work has been directed to developing amendments to the constitution that prohibit the jewish methods of warfare from within.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 16:42:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233070022639177729

    Reply addressees: @ToneUnknown

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233069810948460549

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ToneUnknown They have chosen anti-darwinian sophistry pseudoscience and outright lying in order to rally those under darwinian pressure against our darwinian civilization – that has dragged mankind in the ancient and modern worlds out of ignorance, poverty, starvation, and disease.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1233069810948460549

  • Criticizing and Reforming “logos”

    Criticizing and Reforming “logos” https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/26/criticizing-and-reforming-logos/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 19:21:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232747426613792770

  • I understand that roberts is trying to restore the reputation and method of the

    I understand that roberts is trying to restore the reputation and method of the court. Unfortunately he isn’t willing to make take the corrective actions

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 16:56:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232711008386502656

    Reply addressees: @BlameMaxSand @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232697057414127617

  • TESTIMONY by Corey Harms I have ripped my way through this barren wasteland of p

    TESTIMONY

    by Corey Harms

    I have ripped my way through this barren wasteland of political ideology. I have picked apart again and again and challenged for answers and solutions to problems that most refused to even acknowledge. Libertarianism was the final straw. A hollow shell with hollow promises, and no solutions or answers. Not even an offered path to find solutions.

    Propertarianism is the ONLY one that has fully acknowledged, AND offered solutions. But not just solutions, THE solutions. The near perfect fix.

    Can you offer me something better? I doubt it.

    I still wonder about your aversions to it. It quite literally has most of what you want. Truth as can be proven using the scientific method? Reciprocity? Actual protection of property as it pertains to community/culture put into actual words.

    I had some aversions at first until I recognized certain things that were forcing me to come to conclusions that added context on my own. And, Holy shit, the world ripped wide open for me.

    I think that might be one of the issues. You havent followed at all. Havent really tried to understand, and I mean REALLY try to understand. Come join in the debates. Challenge others. Put it all to the test. Come hang out. It’ll be a good time, I promise.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 14:28:00 UTC

  • Organizing a Movement

    —“We need Organization. There are people everywhere that will feel refreshed after learning this all and jump right on.”—Jeff Carlson

    We will create a political party as the means of organizing The other ‘organizations’ will follow. If we have organic growth we create three wings: educational, political, and militial. If we have time we take the IRA strategy of two wings: political and militial. If we run out of time, we resort to Mao’s strategy of a single wing Political-Militial. In all cases we need a political organization since the world is currently organized to facilitate them and the publicity is free. But it’s time dependent.

  • Organizing a Movement

    —“We need Organization. There are people everywhere that will feel refreshed after learning this all and jump right on.”—Jeff Carlson

    We will create a political party as the means of organizing The other ‘organizations’ will follow. If we have organic growth we create three wings: educational, political, and militial. If we have time we take the IRA strategy of two wings: political and militial. If we run out of time, we resort to Mao’s strategy of a single wing Political-Militial. In all cases we need a political organization since the world is currently organized to facilitate them and the publicity is free. But it’s time dependent.