If law is logically constructed, the polycentrism equates to polylogism. Instead, non-parasitism, mono-logism, and polycentric discovery.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 10:12:00 UTC
If law is logically constructed, the polycentrism equates to polylogism. Instead, non-parasitism, mono-logism, and polycentric discovery.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 10:12:00 UTC
[I] will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms. This is Paternalism. Sovereignty. Nobility. Aristocracy. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
[I] will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms. This is Paternalism. Sovereignty. Nobility. Aristocracy. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
The way you solve lying is by duel.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 08:47:00 UTC
I will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms.
This is nobility. Paternalism. Sovereignty. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 05:53:00 UTC
if you can voluntarily exchange that is fine. If both that is fine. If parasitic then kill them. It’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-06 21:11:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/706588141491261440
Reply addressees: @Wasian_NRx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702711185385398272
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702711185385398272
I would rather invest in a moral man regardless of his abilities than invest in intelligent men regardless of his morality.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 16:24:00 UTC
The only certain way to do good, is to do no harm.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 08:23:00 UTC
THE CONTRACT OF ARISTOCRATIC COOPERATION
We prefer to cooperate morally – meaning beneficially – with you.
If we cannot cooperate beneficially with you on fully moral terms – meaning without parasitism, then we have only four choices:
1) Pay the cost of your parasitism and suffer the consequences, in exchange for avoiding the cost of defending against your parasitism.
2) Boycott you and bearing the costs of boycotting you in exchange for avoiding the cost of transforming you into a moral individual or group.
3) Colonize you and bear the cost of evolving you, in exchange for creating a valued member of mankind.
4) Conquering you and bearing the cost of exterminating you in exchange for freedom from your parasitism.
So, you have a choice: limit your actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, constrained to externalities under the same conditions.
Or we will eventually colonize and reform you, or conquer and exterminate you.
You may have the ambition of mere survival. Our ambition is to make mankind moral. For it is only in moral mankind that the evil and immoral are exterminated forever.
– Aristocratia –
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-19 10:07:00 UTC
Why do you want to tell people what they should do – what costs you think they should bear? Instead, end the involuntary bearing of costs.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-16 11:19:00 UTC