The moral high ground: If you cannot accept voluntary exchange with us in the production of commons we cannot tolerate your existence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-01 09:37:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715835396362539008
Theme: Reciprocity
-
The moral high ground: If you cannot accept voluntary exchange with us in the pr
The moral high ground: If you cannot accept voluntary exchange with us in the production of commons we cannot tolerate your existence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-01 05:37:00 UTC
-
INTRODUCTION TO PROPERTARIANISM FOR SERIOUS NEWBIES
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/AN INTRODUCTION TO PROPERTARIANISM FOR SERIOUS NEWBIES
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 11:21:00 UTC
-
SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING (introduction to propertarianism)
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING
(introduction to propertarianism)
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 11:20:00 UTC
-
Once you say, 1) “I no longer find cooperation valuable, in fact I find it genoc
Once you say,
1) “I no longer find cooperation valuable, in fact I find it genocidal”
2) “Why shall I not demand punishment and restitution for your crimes?”
3) “Why shall I not kill you and take your things?”
4) “I am not interested in compromise. I am only interested in prosecution, restitution, and if necessary your death.”
Kill them all.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-29 05:09:00 UTC
-
ASK THREE QUESTIONS ON IMMIGRATION 1) “Will you reciprocally insure my liberty b
ASK THREE QUESTIONS ON IMMIGRATION
1) “Will you reciprocally insure my liberty buy force of arms if I insure yours by force of arms?”
2) “Will you impose no cost upon me and my life, body, kin, mate, physical property, normative property, institutional property, territorial property, cultural property, that is not the result of productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality?”
3) “Will you agree that there is no law greater than Natural Law, and that in all matters of conflict it is natural law and only natural law that we will use for decidability?”
If so then you agree to engage in liberty with me. If you do not then you do not agree to engage in liberty with me.
BUT
I pray you take heed how you inform our person. For never did men agree to such a treaty that each was not called into demonstration. And unless you adopt our language, our culture, our myths our traditions, our laws, our manners, our ethics, and our morals, then you cannot uphold this treaty. And if you do not uphold it, then we may hold you in violation of it. And end you for your deeds.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 11:55:00 UTC
-
Even as a parent, we are engaged in an exchange. Insurance in existence, for ins
Even as a parent, we are engaged in an exchange. Insurance in existence, for insurance in persistence. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 07:44:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712907962432491520
Reply addressees: @subyroy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712906546137538560
IN REPLY TO:
@subyroy
Parents refuse to treat their sick child medically @curtdoolittle Local govt removes the child & does so instead, an “involuntary transfer”
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712906546137538560
-
People seek excuses to do nothing by rationalizing them away. They are’t making
People seek excuses to do nothing by rationalizing them away. They are’t making moral statements at all. They’re free riding.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 07:33:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712905188680601600
Reply addressees: @AliceTeller
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712712835562921985
IN REPLY TO:
@AliceTeller
Blowing up innocent people who welcomed you to their country makes me say hateful things because I hate people like that. Problem?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712712835562921985
-
Better yet. Instead of accommodating the use of obscurant language to steal from
Better yet. Instead of accommodating the use of obscurant language to steal from one another, why don’t we prosecute it?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 07:14:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712900373774774272
Reply addressees: @pmarca @subyroy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712850980971347968
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712850980971347968
-
How about we just speak the truth at all times, and not use obscurant language t
How about we just speak the truth at all times, and not use obscurant language to try to steal from one another?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 07:13:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712900004449529856
Reply addressees: @pmarca @subyroy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712850980971347968
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712850980971347968