Theme: Reciprocity

  • if we taught children how to speak truthfully, and how to detect lies, and the n

    if we taught children how to speak truthfully, and how to detect lies, and the necessity of voluntary exchange, could we still parent them?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 04:22:00 UTC

  • To join the partnership, you must take the ancient oath in its modern form: I sh

    To join the partnership, you must take the ancient oath in its modern form:

    I shall not steal from mind, body, property or the commons.

    I shall impose no cost upon the mind, body, property, or commons of others.

    I shall take only that which is paid for by productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange, and that imposes no cost upon others.

    I shall defend, prosecute and war against all who lie, cheat, steal or harm.

    I shall safeguard the commons, poor, the weak and the helpless, as I judge I am able.

    I shall teach right and wrong as I am able.

    I shall improve beauty when and where I am able.

    I shall speak the truth even if it means my death.

    This is my oath.

    I pray you kill me if I break it.

    I warn you that I shall kill you if you break yours.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 05:42:00 UTC

  • Any religion not compatible with natural law is not in fact a religion, but a po

    Any religion not compatible with natural law is not in fact a religion, but a political competitor at war with western civilization.

    You can possess no right to freedom of religion if the premise of your religion is other than natural law – since no such rights are possible.

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 11:37:00 UTC

  • The tactic is simple. What are they trying to acquire ? How are they trying to g

    The tactic is simple.

    What are they trying to acquire ?

    How are they trying to get a discount?

    Why are they avoiding an exchange instead of engaging in Fraud?

    What would our team trade them in exchange for what they want?

    Prosecute them for their lying and theft.

    Put them on the defensive.

    This is what I do.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 17:12:00 UTC

  • Do We Really “own” Anything In A Capitalist Society?

    CORRECT ANSWER

    These rights we can observe humans demonstrate:

    Constituo (homesteading / creation)
    Transitus (crossing)
    Observo (observation)
    Usus (use of 3d space)
    Fructus (consume the fruits of)
    Mancipio (sale and transfer)
    Abusus (destruction / conversion)

    When we say ‘ownership’ we mean some subset of these properties.  The limit on ownership is externalities. In other words, your use of a thing cannot harm another. 

    In almost no cases to we grant Abusus to land, water, air, knowledge, art, monument, norm and tradition. Even under slavery you can rarely kill a slave.   Why?  Because these things create externalities that affect others.

    So most of the time when people say their ownership is limited, it is not the property that is limited but the consequences of use of that property.

    All creatures that can move and remember tend to create and defend property: that which they have expended effort to acquire.

    Property rights however are a product of organized cooperation.  The purpose of property RIGHTS is this:
    To reduce transaction costs in determining use. (reduce conflict)
    To eliminate rent seeking from efforts at creating productivity.
    To provide incentives to those who have local knowledge to make use of it in the service of others, through production and trade.
    To provide constant punishment to free riders who are ever-present.
    In other words, to create cooperation at scale in a division of labor in which none can seek rents and all must earn returns.

    In order to accelerate consumption we borrow.  In order to borrow others retain an interest.  You are generally prohibited from Abusus, and your Mancipio is limited.  And if you fail to pay off the lender you will gain back your rights of Mancipio.  But rarely Abusus.

    At all times you possess some subset of rights.  in very few cases do you posssess all rights.

    The current intellectual debate is whether it makes any sense at all to charge interest on home loans since this seems to be one of the the primary causes of inflation. Worse, it is such an important part of the american economy that most economists feel terror at the thought of interfering with it.

    To say that the american economy is a house of cards, for this reason, is not too far off. Our primary source of wealth and our primary industry for two hundred years has been selling off the continent that we conquered to new generations and new immigrants.

    This is our dirty little secret of how the american way of life is really funded.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-we-really-own-anything-in-a-capitalist-society

  • Do We Really “own” Anything In A Capitalist Society?

    CORRECT ANSWER

    These rights we can observe humans demonstrate:

    Constituo (homesteading / creation)
    Transitus (crossing)
    Observo (observation)
    Usus (use of 3d space)
    Fructus (consume the fruits of)
    Mancipio (sale and transfer)
    Abusus (destruction / conversion)

    When we say ‘ownership’ we mean some subset of these properties.  The limit on ownership is externalities. In other words, your use of a thing cannot harm another. 

    In almost no cases to we grant Abusus to land, water, air, knowledge, art, monument, norm and tradition. Even under slavery you can rarely kill a slave.   Why?  Because these things create externalities that affect others.

    So most of the time when people say their ownership is limited, it is not the property that is limited but the consequences of use of that property.

    All creatures that can move and remember tend to create and defend property: that which they have expended effort to acquire.

    Property rights however are a product of organized cooperation.  The purpose of property RIGHTS is this:
    To reduce transaction costs in determining use. (reduce conflict)
    To eliminate rent seeking from efforts at creating productivity.
    To provide incentives to those who have local knowledge to make use of it in the service of others, through production and trade.
    To provide constant punishment to free riders who are ever-present.
    In other words, to create cooperation at scale in a division of labor in which none can seek rents and all must earn returns.

    In order to accelerate consumption we borrow.  In order to borrow others retain an interest.  You are generally prohibited from Abusus, and your Mancipio is limited.  And if you fail to pay off the lender you will gain back your rights of Mancipio.  But rarely Abusus.

    At all times you possess some subset of rights.  in very few cases do you posssess all rights.

    The current intellectual debate is whether it makes any sense at all to charge interest on home loans since this seems to be one of the the primary causes of inflation. Worse, it is such an important part of the american economy that most economists feel terror at the thought of interfering with it.

    To say that the american economy is a house of cards, for this reason, is not too far off. Our primary source of wealth and our primary industry for two hundred years has been selling off the continent that we conquered to new generations and new immigrants.

    This is our dirty little secret of how the american way of life is really funded.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-we-really-own-anything-in-a-capitalist-society

  • No Natural Right To Oppressive Religions #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertari

    No Natural Right To Oppressive Religions
    #AltRight #NRx #conservative #Libertarian #propertarianism https://t.co/qAUkAnLqxp


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 05:09:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709969832192679936

  • Creative Commons provides a moral constraint against profiting from the producti

    Creative Commons provides a moral constraint against profiting from the production of others. Copyright OTOH is not a moral prohibition.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:41:00 UTC

  • Sacred commons. Universal service (militia). Universal standing. The Oath (tell

    Sacred commons. Universal service (militia). Universal standing. The Oath (tell the truth, never steal). Jury. Sovereignty.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-13 13:48:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709013214781153280

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709007640676929536


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @charlesmurray Rule of law. Family as the unit of political decision making, production, and reproduction. Civic (participatory) Society.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/709007640676929536


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @charlesmurray Rule of law. Family as the unit of political decision making, production, and reproduction. Civic (participatory) Society.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/709007640676929536

  • THE TRUTH: Avoidance of Contribution to a Commons Libertarians Deem Disadvantage

    THE TRUTH: Avoidance of Contribution to a Commons Libertarians Deem Disadvantageous to Their Reproductive Strategy.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 13:42:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708649258887548929

    Reply addressees: @libertarianism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708649017475997696


    IN REPLY TO:

    @libertarianism

    Is the foundation for libertarianism based on ethics or economics? https://t.co/2V5xuRSgKM

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708649017475997696