Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • There is a vast difference between free speech and free consistent, corresponden

    There is a vast difference between free speech and free consistent, correspondent, coherent, and reciprocal (ethical and moral) speech. That difference is between the freedom to speak the truth and the freedom to cloud, gossip, deceive, and lie. #jordanpeterson

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:44:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974763307046506497

    Reply addressees: @DeTabachnick @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972308926766157824

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972308926766157824

  • If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, a

    If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, and fully accounted, then why must I say something NEW in order to say something TRUE? Each generation restates wisdom literature in generational prose. Hence persistence of paradigms over generations.

  • If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, a

    If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, and fully accounted, then why must I say something NEW in order to say something TRUE? Each generation restates wisdom literature in generational prose. Hence persistence of paradigms over generations.

  • If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, a

    If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, and fully accounted, then why must I say something NEW in order to say something TRUE? Each generation restates wisdom literature in generational prose. Hence persistence of paradigms over generations.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:19:00 UTC

  • Worth Repeating

    Anything important that can be said about economics or law, can only be said about externalities. The only way to restore libertarianism to the discipline of the natural law of reciprocity in the anglo saxon tradition, is to return commons and externalities to the discourse. !!!!Only Commons Produce Private Property!!!!

  • Worth Repeating

    Anything important that can be said about economics or law, can only be said about externalities. The only way to restore libertarianism to the discipline of the natural law of reciprocity in the anglo saxon tradition, is to return commons and externalities to the discourse. !!!!Only Commons Produce Private Property!!!!

  • WORTH REPEATING Anything important that can be said about economics or law, can

    WORTH REPEATING

    Anything important that can be said about economics or law, can only be said about externalities. The only way to restore libertarianism to the discipline of the natural law of reciprocity in the anglo saxon tradition, is to return commons and externalities to the discourse.

    !!!!Only Commons Produce Private Property!!!!

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 20:55:00 UTC

  • The Parasitisms That Compete With Reciprocity

    Marxism = parasitism upon private property. Libertarianism = Parasitism upon commons. NeoConservatism = Parasitism upon Genes, Traditions, and Institutions. Authoritarianism masks the underlying theft, which is why I talk not about the authority (which each sector justified) but about the thefts (which are very hard to). Same with economics. We talk about whether they aer scientific or not but we do not talk about the thefts that occur, versus the trades that would be possible under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity. Theft is not an opinion. “Good” is an opinion.

  • THE PARASITISMS THAT COMPETE WITH RECIPROCITY Marxism = parasitism upon private

    THE PARASITISMS THAT COMPETE WITH RECIPROCITY

    Marxism = parasitism upon private property.

    Libertarianism = Parasitism upon commons.

    NeoConservatism = Parasitism upon Genes, Traditions, and Institutions.

    Authoritarianism masks the underlying theft, which is why I talk not about the authority (which each sector justified) but about the thefts (which are very hard to).

    Same with economics. We talk about whether they aer scientific or not but we do not talk about the thefts that occur, versus the trades that would be possible under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity.

    Theft is not an opinion. “Good” is an opinion.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:41:00 UTC

  • The Parasitisms That Compete With Reciprocity

    Marxism = parasitism upon private property. Libertarianism = Parasitism upon commons. NeoConservatism = Parasitism upon Genes, Traditions, and Institutions. Authoritarianism masks the underlying theft, which is why I talk not about the authority (which each sector justified) but about the thefts (which are very hard to). Same with economics. We talk about whether they aer scientific or not but we do not talk about the thefts that occur, versus the trades that would be possible under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity. Theft is not an opinion. “Good” is an opinion.