Theme: Reciprocity

  • So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, a

    So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, and deed. In other words, the only moral rule equally extensible to all is RECIPROCITY (exchange).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 13:52:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975007013565599744

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974991370174660608


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974991370174660608

  • Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs agai

    Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs against their will. Only negative freedoms are equally extensible to all because they ask us NOT to do something. Rights are merely positive expressions of the right to sue for restitution.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 13:49:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975006275162574848

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974991370174660608


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974991370174660608

  • Positive Freedoms Cannot Exist

    Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs against their will. Only negative freedoms are equally extensible to all because they ask us NOT to do something. Rights are merely positive expressions of the right to sue for restitution. So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, and deed. In other words, the only moral rule equally extensible to all is RECIPROCITY (exchange). So while the moral person wants freedom of all speech under the assumption others only err, or are victims of their ability and ignorance, the reality is that the industrialization of lying by pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and propaganda in the 20th century has caused damage only equalled by the Abrahamic Dark Age. Westerners have produced the only existing high trust civilization, but this left the west uniquely vulnerable to the cheap production of propaganda. Lies are cheap/Truth Expensive. And the many who lied by propaganda, pseudoscience, and pseudo-rationalism, as a means of destroying that high trust civilization could do so because it is simply too expensive to correct a desirable falsehood and too cheap to perpetuate it. Thankfully, between archeology, cognitive science, genetics, the results of the world experiment with different forms of government, and the world experiments with different forms of economics, the entire propaganda program of the early and mid 20th century had been ended.
  • Positive Freedoms Cannot Exist

    Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs against their will. Only negative freedoms are equally extensible to all because they ask us NOT to do something. Rights are merely positive expressions of the right to sue for restitution. So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, and deed. In other words, the only moral rule equally extensible to all is RECIPROCITY (exchange). So while the moral person wants freedom of all speech under the assumption others only err, or are victims of their ability and ignorance, the reality is that the industrialization of lying by pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and propaganda in the 20th century has caused damage only equalled by the Abrahamic Dark Age. Westerners have produced the only existing high trust civilization, but this left the west uniquely vulnerable to the cheap production of propaganda. Lies are cheap/Truth Expensive. And the many who lied by propaganda, pseudoscience, and pseudo-rationalism, as a means of destroying that high trust civilization could do so because it is simply too expensive to correct a desirable falsehood and too cheap to perpetuate it. Thankfully, between archeology, cognitive science, genetics, the results of the world experiment with different forms of government, and the world experiments with different forms of economics, the entire propaganda program of the early and mid 20th century had been ended.
  • POSITIVE FREEDOMS CANNOT EXIST Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force

    POSITIVE FREEDOMS CANNOT EXIST

    Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs against their will. Only negative freedoms are equally extensible to all because they ask us NOT to do something. Rights are merely positive expressions of the right to sue for restitution.

    So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, and deed. In other words, the only moral rule equally extensible to all is RECIPROCITY (exchange).

    So while the moral person wants freedom of all speech under the assumption others only err, or are victims of their ability and ignorance, the reality is that the industrialization of lying by pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and propaganda in the 20th century has caused damage only equalled by the Abrahamic Dark Age. Westerners have produced the only existing high trust civilization, but this left the west uniquely vulnerable to the cheap production of propaganda. Lies are cheap/Truth Expensive.

    And the many who lied by propaganda, pseudoscience, and pseudo-rationalism, as a means of destroying that high trust civilization could do so because it is simply too expensive to correct a desirable falsehood and too cheap to perpetuate it.

    Thankfully, between archeology, cognitive science, genetics, the results of the world experiment with different forms of government, and the world experiments with different forms of economics, the entire propaganda program of the early and mid 20th century had been ended.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 10:03:00 UTC

  • Anything important that can be said about economics or law, can only be said abo

    Anything important that can be said about economics or law, can only be said about externalities. The only way to restore libertarianism to the discipline of the natural law of reciprocity in the anglo saxon tradition, is to return commons and externalities to the discourse.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 00:22:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974803164519124993

    Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon @FriedrichHayek

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974802785853214720


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @BobMurphyEcon @FriedrichHayek You are rarely wrong. In fact, in the entire discipline you are pretty much the only person rarely wrong.But the fact that you don’t take the argument through the conclusion, simply perpetuates everything that has led anarchism to a dead end. Only Commons Produce Private Property

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/974802785853214720


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @BobMurphyEcon @FriedrichHayek You are rarely wrong. In fact, in the entire discipline you are pretty much the only person rarely wrong.But the fact that you don’t take the argument through the conclusion, simply perpetuates everything that has led anarchism to a dead end. Only Commons Produce Private Property

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/974802785853214720

  • If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, a

    If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, and fully accounted, then why must I say something NEW in order to say something TRUE? Each generation restates wisdom literature in generational prose. Hence persistence of paradigms over generations.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 22:20:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974772366130794498

  • If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, a

    If I make statements that are consistent, correspondent, coherent, reciprocal, and fully accounted, then why must I say something NEW in order to say something TRUE? Each generation restates wisdom literature in generational prose. Hence persistence of paradigms over generations.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 22:20:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974772338167353357

    Reply addressees: @DougJanack

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971020942322421760


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DougJanack

    On the likening of #jordanpeterson to Marshall McLuhan: can anyone point to ONE original idea of Peterson’s? Seems like a blend of Jung, Joseph Campbell, and Northrop Frye served in a reduction of right wing conspiracy theory.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971020942322421760

  • There is a vast difference between freedom to ridicule, shame, gossip, obscure,

    There is a vast difference between freedom to ridicule, shame, gossip, obscure, load, frame, overload, suggest, fictionalize, deceive, lie, and defraud, promote free riding, parasitism, predation – and speaking with reciprocity (morally), and truthfully.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:52:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765328734523392

  • There is a vast difference between freedom to ridicule, shame, gossip, obscure,

    There is a vast difference between freedom to ridicule, shame, gossip, obscure, load, frame, overload, suggest, fictionalize, deceive, lie, and defraud, promote free riding, parasitism, predation – and speaking with reciprocity (morally), and truthfully.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:51:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765246765240320

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970420628388855808


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970420628388855808