As far as i know we have discovered only one law and that is reciprocity. in addition we produce findings of law, legislation with the power of law, and regulation with the power of law in cases of prior restraint. law persists while findings, regulation, legislation, and command, do not.
Ergo, people want the right to form their own governments so that they can create their own findings, regulation, legislation, and command to suit their group competitive abilities.
Theme: Reciprocity
-
There Is Only One Law
As far as i know we have discovered only one law and that is reciprocity. in addition we produce findings of law, legislation with the power of law, and regulation with the power of law in cases of prior restraint. law persists while findings, regulation, legislation, and command, do not. Ergo, people want the right to form their own governments so that they can create their own findings, regulation, legislation, and command to suit their group competitive abilities. -
Impositions of Cost: voluntary exchange(good) > involuntary transfer > free ridi
Impositions of Cost: voluntary exchange(good) > involuntary transfer > free riding(parasitism) > extortion(direct and indirect) > crime(violence, theft, harm) > unethical(interpersonal) > immoral(indirect) > evil (for the externalities produced – ie: the domino effect of harm. )
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 00:58:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975174548332138496
Reply addressees: @_enlacarraca
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975172182547542016
IN REPLY TO:
@_enlacarraca
@curtdoolittle What’s evil? Is it objetive or subjective?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975172182547542016
-
Think of it this way: For those of us who are strong, able, influential, and res
Think of it this way: For those of us who are strong, able, influential, and resourceful enough to impose our will on others regardless of their opinions, the only reason not do is if we limit our conflict to truthful, scientific, voluntary exchanges. Thats western civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 00:24:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975166025477050368
Reply addressees: @belle_levesque @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975152050328584192
IN REPLY TO:
@belle_levesque
@jordanbpeterson fan.
Surprise. https://t.co/1oMsRg9VS9Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975152050328584192
-
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he t
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he thinks he is evil, but because his actions are warranted – either via punishment, retribution, restitution, profit, or some version of ‘getting his or her fair share’ (which is the justification we make for most of ou… -
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he t
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he thinks he is evil, but because his actions are warranted – either via punishment, retribution, restitution, profit, or some version of ‘getting his or her fair share’ (which is the justification we make for most of ou… -
It’s rather technical, (natural law of reciprocity) and it’s the logic behind th
It’s rather technical, (natural law of reciprocity) and it’s the logic behind the constitution and our ancient tradition of germanic common law. -Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:33:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975107899176386565
Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975046491810160640
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975046491810160640
-
I’m not sure that’s right Dr Peterson, in the sense that women are not bound by
I’m not sure that’s right Dr Peterson, in the sense that women are not bound by the reciprocal threat between males as they were prior to 1900. Duel, Libel, Slander, and Scold were effective for both genders.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 17:58:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975068761236664320
Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975059531473477632
IN REPLY TO:
@jordanbpeterson
High trait agreeableness neuroticism, I would guess. But of course such differences don’t really exist. https://t.co/jhsXYF5kt6
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975059531473477632
-
Ergo, there is no condition under which untruthful speech does not violate recip
Ergo, there is no condition under which untruthful speech does not violate reciprocity and therefore sovereignty, and therefore insurance of reciprocity and sovereignty. Either you can warranty your words our you are externalizing costs of doing so onto others.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 15:38:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975033664881987584
Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197
-
Truth is truth by the way, reciprocity is reciprocity, and while it may seem dif
Truth is truth by the way, reciprocity is reciprocity, and while it may seem difficult to you, distinguishing science from every other form of falsehood is pretty simple. That’s why science is the universal language of truth. Everything else isn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:56:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975022972930052096
Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975017310908948482
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975017310908948482