Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • The problem with Hans’ “Physical Removal” is that it violates Reciprocity by ext

    The problem with Hans’ “Physical Removal” is that it violates Reciprocity by externality. Take responsibility. Solve the problem. 😉

    —update—

    —-“hmm it’s a litter issue. Nuclear waste issue. Hazard left for others to deal with and those others might be descendants.”—Steve Pender

    —I’m not certain what you mean, but if you’re basically saying “deal with the pathological people in your society without foisting them upon others”, I agree.”— Justin Odiogn

    That’s all I was saying. But… You’re not getting the joke.

    “noose, pike, and pyre.”

    It’s not that much of an inside joke.

    It’s not that hard to ‘get’.

    It’s the equivalent of “K— them all and let god sort it out”

    Like i’ve said before, I’m not that funny. But I still try. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 11:14:00 UTC

  • IT NOW!!!! ALL: I didn’t think anyone, even John Mark could do better than his R

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evGCpSS7vC8WATCH IT NOW!!!!

    ALL: I didn’t think anyone, even John Mark could do better than his Reciprocity video.

    I was wrong. He did. Watch and Listen to John’s video on Trump using Reciprocity, and the state of the grassroots right.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evGCpSS7vC8Updated Oct 6, 2019, 8:55 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 08:55:00 UTC

  • ORIGINS OF THE NAP IN SEPARATISM —“NAP evolved out of the Jewish Ghetto ethic

    ORIGINS OF THE NAP IN SEPARATISM

    —“NAP evolved out of the Jewish Ghetto ethic of being able to do whatever you want to people, provided you don’t engage in physical violence. So the NAP in… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=478724332724462&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 17:42:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180538661785485312

  • MORE ON LYING —“What is the argument against selfish lying if it serves my sel

    MORE ON LYING
    —“What is the argument against selfish lying if it serves my self interest, assuming the majority of people don’t lie to burst the language bubble.”– Gyeff @Gyeff

    SPECTRUM… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=478710399392522&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 17:15:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180532035330461696

  • Restitution is easy. The Prevention will be brutal. Because we must create a pun

    Restitution is easy. The Prevention will be brutal. Because we must create a punishment that provides sufficient incentive, that the repetition of the female strategy of undermining civilization, evolution, and our transcendence into the gods we imagine is ever again attempted.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 15:58:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180512655745994753

    Reply addressees: @nytopinion

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180512411960389637

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @nytopinion So who are the producers of the propaganda, arts, literature, architecture and schools of the postwar era attempting to create the same destruction of the third great civilization of european peoples? Our law requires Restitution and Prevention.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180512411960389637

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @nytopinion So who are the producers of the propaganda, arts, literature, architecture and schools of the postwar era attempting to create the same destruction of the third great civilization of european peoples? Our law requires Restitution and Prevention.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180512411960389637

  • ORIGINS OF THE NAP IN SEPARATISM —“NAP evolved out of the Jewish Ghetto ethic

    ORIGINS OF THE NAP IN SEPARATISM

    —“NAP evolved out of the Jewish Ghetto ethic of being able to do whatever you want to people, provided you don’t engage in physical violence. So the NAP in theory does not recognize feminine means of coercion by undermining as aggression.”— John Smith

    (NOTE: I’ve probably said something of this nature five thousand times and never put it that simply. That’s perfect. Damn. Monarchies gave ‘liberty’ to subgroups to practice their ‘traditional custom’ in ghettos or ‘quarters’ and only kept the PHYSICAL peace between them. )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 13:41:00 UTC

  • MORE ON LYING —“What is the argument against selfish lying if it serves my sel

    MORE ON LYING

    —“What is the argument against selfish lying if it serves my self interest, assuming the majority of people don’t lie to burst the language bubble.”– Gyeff @Gyeff

    SPECTRUM

    Transparent Lies – Signal Conformity

    White Lies – provide comfort to the psyche

    Grey Lies – protect from consequences of accident, impropriety, or folly

    Black Lies – Pursue gains by means of deceit

    Evil Lies – Pursue harm for the sake of harm.

    People are amoral, and immoral or moral as suits their interests. People conspire ie, cheat, steal, harm and murder as suits their interests.We have just worked very hard to create institutions such that it doesn’t suit their interests. Lying is one of the hardest crimes to limit…

    …because we continually shift techniques such that we need only raise the cost of truth discovery by creating ambiguity such that lie is indistinguishable from ignorance, error, or natural limitations in judgement and prediction.

    As such only westerners have succeeded in such suppression of falsehood, that we are able to produce high trust commons, and the means by which we evolved that tradition is almost impossible to replicate without intentionally designing a legal system for it (which I did.)

    So like manythings, truth telling is just a tax. Truth Before Face, Before Gain, Before All, regardless of impact to the competence-dominance hierarchy is uniquely western. But it is the primary reason for our sovereignty, liberty, freedom, prosperity, and dominion over nature.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 13:15:00 UTC

  • I’m absolutely a universal nationalist since it’s the only political order that

    I’m absolutely a universal nationalist since it’s the only political order that doesn’t impose costs upon others and therefore the only international order that doesn’t violate natural law of reciprocity. https://twitter.com/Hail__To_You/status/1180175878833106944

  • USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS The NAP? Really? 1. Define aggression,

    USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS

    The NAP?
    Really?

    1. Define aggression, and aggression against what? How do you know what aggression means, and how do you know what constitutes… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=478058066124422&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 16:40:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180160793251328000

  • USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS The NAP? Really? 1. Define aggression,

    USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS

    The NAP?

    Really?

    1. Define aggression, and aggression against what? How do you know what aggression means, and how do you know what constitutes aggression against what?

    a) define aggression?

    b) against what?

    c) who determines it’s aggression and how?

    2. The litmus test is blackmail. Is blackmail aggression?

    3. What is the minimum scope of property necessary for a polity to survive competition for territory and people? How do you know that?

    4. What is the minimum scope of contributions to the production of commons (defense, common goods and services) sufficient for a polity to survive competition for territory, population, and political control? How do you know that?

    5. Why can’t I proactively defend myself on my terms rather than wait until an opposition individual, group, organization, or state conducts violence, harm, theft, fraud, socialization of losses, free riding, rent seeking, corruption, immigration, conversion, undermining, warfare, conquest?

    Once you realize you’re a useful idiot it will probably make you angry that you were a useful idiot and then you will go thru a period of hating the enemy for baiting you in to useful idiocy, but the fact remains – you are a useful idiot if you bought the NAP instead of rule of law by sovereignty and reciprocity where property consists of demonstrated interests.

    You and your opinion don’t matter. The market determines all of these – not you.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 12:40:00 UTC