TRUMP HAS GONE FULL PROPERTARIAN
—“The word ‘reciprocity’ is probably my favorite word’— Trump
😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 08:07:00 UTC
Theme: Reciprocity
-
TRUMP HAS GONE FULL PROPERTARIAN —“The word ‘reciprocity’ is probably my favor
-
So when you say ‘adaptive’ independent of costs, that licenses Genghis Khan. I c
So when you say ‘adaptive’ independent of costs, that licenses Genghis Khan. I can’t determine whether you mean survival from stresses, competition within mutually beneficial limits, or adaptation to ordinary change.
IOW: is your claim of undecidability true?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:03:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184575536221315072
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184575137074548741
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski … but rarely if ever for a group. Just the opposite. At least, I can’t find any evidence of it in history. At some point reciprocity within limits of proportionality are necessary to prevent defection or limit one’s replacement (assassination).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184575137074548741
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski … but rarely if ever for a group. Just the opposite. At least, I can’t find any evidence of it in history. At some point reciprocity within limits of proportionality are necessary to prevent defection or limit one’s replacement (assassination).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184575137074548741
-
but rarely if ever for a group. Just the opposite. At least, I can’t find any ev
… but rarely if ever for a group. Just the opposite. At least, I can’t find any evidence of it in history. At some point reciprocity within limits of proportionality are necessary to prevent defection or limit one’s replacement (assassination).
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:01:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184575137074548741
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184574304366845952
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski Economic (productive) is not a necessity (‘square’) however unproductive (false, irreciprocal, parasitic, predatory) does (‘square’) in-group, while such questions as ethics and morality are then meaningless out-group. In other words, predation is always adaptive for some…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184574304366845952
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski Economic (productive) is not a necessity (‘square’) however unproductive (false, irreciprocal, parasitic, predatory) does (‘square’) in-group, while such questions as ethics and morality are then meaningless out-group. In other words, predation is always adaptive for some…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184574304366845952
-
Economic (productive) is not a necessity (‘square’) however unproductive (false,
Economic (productive) is not a necessity (‘square’) however unproductive (false, irreciprocal, parasitic, predatory) does (‘square’) in-group, while such questions as ethics and morality are then meaningless out-group. In other words, predation is always adaptive for some…
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:58:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184574304366845952
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184568198940618752
IN REPLY TO:
@MattPirkowski
@curtdoolittle Whereas ethical integrity, in this context, represents the capacity to recognize that what is economically expedient does not always square with what is adaptive. Money, especially in its current form, cares nothing of humanity’s sustainable time preference.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184568198940618752
-
So while we might convey meaning by fictionalism, fiction, and idealism, we can
So while we might convey meaning by fictionalism, fiction, and idealism, we can only testify to the actionable material, costs, and reciprocity. Ergo, establish meaning by fiction, or ideal, then warranty against error, bias, deceit, and fraud by operational (real).
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:54:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184573355044810754
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184572810007588864
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski And the principle fraud insidious: pretension of knowledge and decidability one does not possess.
In practice, Legal requires both costs and reciprocity; Aristotelian requires the material; ideal and supernatural none. Why? To Testify with responsibility or to Lie without it.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184572810007588864
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski And the principle fraud insidious: pretension of knowledge and decidability one does not possess.
In practice, Legal requires both costs and reciprocity; Aristotelian requires the material; ideal and supernatural none. Why? To Testify with responsibility or to Lie without it.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184572810007588864
-
And the principle fraud insidious: pretension of knowledge and decidability one
And the principle fraud insidious: pretension of knowledge and decidability one does not possess.
In practice, Legal requires both costs and reciprocity; Aristotelian requires the material; ideal and supernatural none. Why? To Testify with responsibility or to Lie without it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:52:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184572810007588864
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184571621970980868
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski The presumption of ignorance and error is a polite manifestation of western ethics of discourse, but it is not however evidenced in history. We err far less than we deceive, and the vast majority of thought is but elaborate deception to perpetuate one fraud, another, or many.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184571621970980868
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski The presumption of ignorance and error is a polite manifestation of western ethics of discourse, but it is not however evidenced in history. We err far less than we deceive, and the vast majority of thought is but elaborate deception to perpetuate one fraud, another, or many.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184571621970980868
-
Hmm… I had to work on the eradication of deceit, and came to the opposite conc
Hmm… I had to work on the eradication of deceit, and came to the opposite conclusion: that conceptual development is discernibly either reciprocal or irreciprocal(fraud), and thus the judgement is possible and necessary: one dark age of ignorance and deceit is enough.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:46:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184571257846747137
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184566418475405312
IN REPLY TO:
@MattPirkowski
@curtdoolittle This scope appears quite limited, as I do not presume to place conceptual evolution itself on trial, and side with those pragmatists who take the side of that which appears necessary in service of adaptive continuity.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184566418475405312
-
(Spell Checker confusion: ir-reciprocity vs reciprocity)
(Spell Checker confusion: ir-reciprocity vs reciprocity)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:28:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184234507286827014
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227519022714883
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I am aware that it’s an uneven contest but I’ll happily debate anyone intellectually honest: Women are excessively privileged, and failing to learn, just like all other peoples have failed to learn, from the lessons of european achievement in the ancient and modern world: Trade.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227519022714883
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
I am aware that it’s an uneven contest but I’ll happily debate anyone intellectually honest: Women are excessively privileged, and failing to learn, just like all other peoples have failed to learn, from the lessons of european achievement in the ancient and modern world: Trade.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227519022714883
-
“It also emerges that the failure to recognize women as human”– No, just that w
—“It also emerges that the failure to recognize women as human”– No, just that women are unequal to men in the foundations of european successes: truth, reciprocity, duty, markets, and meritocracy, and so far have demanded concessions in every aspect of life to accommodate.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227515734417408
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227514887086082
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Our success that made women’s ‘liberation’ from household chores, and productive enough to hire substitute mothers, was the product of 1500+years of eugenics, as much as it was our strange male obsession with truth reciprocity and institutions of continuous competition.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227514887086082
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
Our success that made women’s ‘liberation’ from household chores, and productive enough to hire substitute mothers, was the product of 1500+years of eugenics, as much as it was our strange male obsession with truth reciprocity and institutions of continuous competition.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227514887086082
-
Envy, Revolt against Nature. Demand for greater gains for less contributions. Ye
Envy, Revolt against Nature. Demand for greater gains for less contributions. Yes. But the west advanced beyond the rest by legal sovereignty, reciprocity, truth before face, judgement by jury, and resulting markets in all aspects of life – domesticating (Eugenics) the worst.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227514010472449
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227513150726144
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
What does Moral mean? It can only mean reciprocity (voluntary exchange) within limits of proportionality (defection). Normative morals vary because reciprocal traditions vary. Personal moral bias is just a demonstration of Class, Gender, Gender Expression and Sexual Market Value.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227513150726144
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
What does Moral mean? It can only mean reciprocity (voluntary exchange) within limits of proportionality (defection). Normative morals vary because reciprocal traditions vary. Personal moral bias is just a demonstration of Class, Gender, Gender Expression and Sexual Market Value.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227513150726144