And the principle fraud insidious: pretension of knowledge and decidability one does not possess.
In practice, Legal requires both costs and reciprocity; Aristotelian requires the material; ideal and supernatural none. Why? To Testify with responsibility or to Lie without it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:52:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184572810007588864
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184571621970980868
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski The presumption of ignorance and error is a polite manifestation of western ethics of discourse, but it is not however evidenced in history. We err far less than we deceive, and the vast majority of thought is but elaborate deception to perpetuate one fraud, another, or many.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184571621970980868
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski The presumption of ignorance and error is a polite manifestation of western ethics of discourse, but it is not however evidenced in history. We err far less than we deceive, and the vast majority of thought is but elaborate deception to perpetuate one fraud, another, or many.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184571621970980868
Leave a Reply