… but rarely if ever for a group. Just the opposite. At least, I can’t find any evidence of it in history. At some point reciprocity within limits of proportionality are necessary to prevent defection or limit one’s replacement (assassination).
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:01:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184575137074548741
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184574304366845952
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski Economic (productive) is not a necessity (‘square’) however unproductive (false, irreciprocal, parasitic, predatory) does (‘square’) in-group, while such questions as ethics and morality are then meaningless out-group. In other words, predation is always adaptive for some…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184574304366845952
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski Economic (productive) is not a necessity (‘square’) however unproductive (false, irreciprocal, parasitic, predatory) does (‘square’) in-group, while such questions as ethics and morality are then meaningless out-group. In other words, predation is always adaptive for some…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184574304366845952
Leave a Reply