Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • Trust, Cooperation (reciprocity), and Decidability of Limits Are Vectors that Develop a Civilization’s Long Term Success

    TRUST, COOPERATION (RECIPROCITY), AND DECIDABILITY OF LIMITS ARE VECTORS THAT DEVELOP A CIVILIZATION’S LONG TERM SUCCESS by Lucas Cort (Flawless – CD) The idea that everyone is equal appears to be a good rule for cooperation (when people share similarities) but it neglects full accounting in terms of differences in specialization, incentives,actions, and abilities. Individual: Morphology, cognition, incentives, preferences, morals, culture Genders: Morphology (bodies: bone structure and density, reproductive organs, endocrinology, brain structure distributions), reproductive strategies (incentives, preferences, morals, temperament) Races: Morphology (bodies: bone structure and density, reproductive organs, brain structure distributions), neoteny (rates and duration of sexual maturity), distributions of reproductive strategies, (incentives, preferences, morals, temperament) and group evolutionary strategies (cultural, organization and applications of violence) Classes: Rates of production, consumption, distributions of proceeding categories: (individual,genders,races) If we don’t address differences, we distort the measures that lead to decidability through full accounting and disambiguation. Differences in all these categories can be seen as specializations in the acquisition of genetic, social-cultural, and economic capital. They affect the way we act in the environment with others due to differing incentives. The result of demonstrated property (property-en-toto) shows that people invest and are willing to defend against the impositions of costs. Differing incentives, cognitive biases, reproductive and group evolutionary strategies show that people value property differently. Understanding that differences between the golden rule and the silver rule: Golden rule – “Do unto others as you would have done unto you” Silver rule – “Do not unto others as you would not have done unto you.” And

    Tolerance and forbearance:

    Tolerance – “I use Tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs” – Luke Weinhagen Forbearance – “Forbearance includes tolerance AND limits (until the cost one was willing carried has been exceeded), AND active participation – its a choice which one can boycott/defect based on the cost carried.” – Bill Joslin Clarifies limits, and aids in decidability to in and out group disputes. By disambiguating differences we can address the constant relations across and between these groups, and their interactions allows us to accurately measure transfers between them. Measuring violations of reciprocity under rule of law makes us equal before the law. We are not all equal, but if we insure each other against parasitism, we can preserve cooperation. That way, we don’t shift costs, and we identify group conflict so that we can focus on real solutions to incentivize cooperation. (CD: I can’t tell I didn’t write it myself. It’s flawless. it’s very difficult to get to this level of competency. color me impressed. thank you Lucas. )

  • No, What Threatens Islam Is Low Status, Truth, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy

    No, What Threatens Islam Is Low Status, Truth, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy, and Eugenics that Result https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/no-what-threatens-islam-is-low-status-truth-reciprocity-markets-meritocracy-and-eugenics-that-result/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 13:28:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267447897064452096

  • No, What Threatens Islam Is Low Status, Truth, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy

    No, What Threatens Islam Is Low Status, Truth, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy, and Eugenics that Result https://t.co/KRfIoMi1WH

  • No, What Threatens Islam Is Low Status, Truth, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy, and Eugenics that Result

    NO, WHAT THREATENS ISLAM IS LOW STATUS, TRUTH, RECIPROCITY, MARKETS, MERITOCRACY, AND EUGENICS THAT RESULT

    —“Nothing threatens Islamic extremists in the West more than a Christian identity that revolves around family, authentic values and principles. They love what the Left promotes: no genders, no identity, and total confusion. They use that as a vehicle to take over and gain power.”—Imam of Peace @Imamofpeace

    What threatens islam is low status, b/c the terms by which one finds value in the self(obedience), and pretense of value to others(conformity), and means of advocacy (lying) is destructive, vs the value of western rule of law, truth before face, real productivity for reputation. Islam tried to solve the problem of pervasive corrupt tribal paternity with an equality in ignorance, respect, obedience, and poverty regardless of productivity. This meant success by stealing (conquest) and taxing (trade), but a failure to develop food, law, truth, tech, trade. The result was an exhaustion of the accumulated genetic, resource, intellectual, cultural, artistic capital of every great civilization of the ancient world, as each successive gene pool collapsed under the weight of a massive, ignorant, illiterate, unproductive, underclass. When the European Age of Sail eliminated the ability to ‘free ride’ on world trade, keeping the rest of the world as backward as islam, the world circumvented the islamic world and let it fall into natural productivity without european agrarian (balkan) food, or world trade. The greatest casualty for the west was Iran, and the loss of the Persian people into the catastrophe of islam, instead of following the indian and european peoples into modernity, and prosperity. Unfortunately, islam was attracted to the false promise of Jewish marxism (again). And western attempts to prevent the expansion of marxism – as economically destructive to people as islam was genetically, intellectually, and culturally – into the islamic world have failed, and islamic fundamentalism has returned as the alternative to marxism – …. … with the same tactics: sell false comfort to the underclass, who will then recruit neighboring underclasses, and destroy western and indian civilization as islam has destroyed north african, egyptian, byzantine, levantine, persian, civilizations. But genetic decline within. The chinese, japanes, and koreans are fully aware of the cancer of the abrahamic religions of judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The west has converted christianity into a germanic folk religion and destroyed the political church. All that remains: copy the Chinese, buy putting a wall around islam and letting muslims either reform or starve, rather than, like cancer, consume the other peoples by continuing the process of destruction of heroism and excellence, truth and duty, law, and merit in production.

  • No, What Threatens Islam Is Low Status, Truth, Reciprocity, Markets, Meritocracy, and Eugenics that Result

    NO, WHAT THREATENS ISLAM IS LOW STATUS, TRUTH, RECIPROCITY, MARKETS, MERITOCRACY, AND EUGENICS THAT RESULT

    —“Nothing threatens Islamic extremists in the West more than a Christian identity that revolves around family, authentic values and principles. They love what the Left promotes: no genders, no identity, and total confusion. They use that as a vehicle to take over and gain power.”—Imam of Peace @Imamofpeace

    What threatens islam is low status, b/c the terms by which one finds value in the self(obedience), and pretense of value to others(conformity), and means of advocacy (lying) is destructive, vs the value of western rule of law, truth before face, real productivity for reputation. Islam tried to solve the problem of pervasive corrupt tribal paternity with an equality in ignorance, respect, obedience, and poverty regardless of productivity. This meant success by stealing (conquest) and taxing (trade), but a failure to develop food, law, truth, tech, trade. The result was an exhaustion of the accumulated genetic, resource, intellectual, cultural, artistic capital of every great civilization of the ancient world, as each successive gene pool collapsed under the weight of a massive, ignorant, illiterate, unproductive, underclass. When the European Age of Sail eliminated the ability to ‘free ride’ on world trade, keeping the rest of the world as backward as islam, the world circumvented the islamic world and let it fall into natural productivity without european agrarian (balkan) food, or world trade. The greatest casualty for the west was Iran, and the loss of the Persian people into the catastrophe of islam, instead of following the indian and european peoples into modernity, and prosperity. Unfortunately, islam was attracted to the false promise of Jewish marxism (again). And western attempts to prevent the expansion of marxism – as economically destructive to people as islam was genetically, intellectually, and culturally – into the islamic world have failed, and islamic fundamentalism has returned as the alternative to marxism – …. … with the same tactics: sell false comfort to the underclass, who will then recruit neighboring underclasses, and destroy western and indian civilization as islam has destroyed north african, egyptian, byzantine, levantine, persian, civilizations. But genetic decline within. The chinese, japanes, and koreans are fully aware of the cancer of the abrahamic religions of judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The west has converted christianity into a germanic folk religion and destroyed the political church. All that remains: copy the Chinese, buy putting a wall around islam and letting muslims either reform or starve, rather than, like cancer, consume the other peoples by continuing the process of destruction of heroism and excellence, truth and duty, law, and merit in production.

  • How Will P-Law on Truthful and Reciprocal Public Speech Affect Me, and Our Lives

    How Will P-Law on Truthful and Reciprocal Public Speech Affect Me, and Our Lives? https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/how-will-p-law-on-truthful-and-reciprocal-public-speech-affect-me-and-our-lives/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 12:58:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267440287682617344

  • How Will P-Law on Truthful and Reciprocal Public Speech Affect Me, and Our Lives

    How Will P-Law on Truthful and Reciprocal Public Speech Affect Me, and Our Lives? https://t.co/scHFGcaKC8

  • How Will P-Law on Truthful and Reciprocal Public Speech Affect Me, and Our Lives?

      We’re decreasing tolerance for, and extending the liability for, the truthfulness and reciprocity we already enforce in contracts, selling, marketing and advertising, to all speech in public to the public, on matters of the public, making it impossible for anyone, including you, marketers, professors, intellectuals, media, and politicians, say anything they can’t testify to in court, because it is testifiable, and reciprocal. Meaning you must limit your public speech in public, to the public in matters public, especially for persona, economic or political gains, to what you can demonstrate you know enough to testify to, and that you can demonstrate you are not advocating, encouraging, or causing, the imposition of costs upon others without their fully informed, voluntary exchange. The only objection you can have is if you want engage in false and or irreciprocal speech. This means we will restore libel, slander, harmful gossip (undermining), psychologizing and moralizing (undermining instead of explaining the rational incentives of the people involved), suggestion(implying but not stating), obscurantism (hiding the truth), all left attempts at using the government to take rather than exchange between us, and all left attempts at lying about humans, our psychological, social, economic, and political orders. In other words, it will restore our informational commons to only that which one warrants is not false and not hurtful or harmful, or you will pay the price as if you did so in court. This means you can say whatever you want as long as it’s a constructive, a compromise exchange, helpful, and true. It means you cant say anything that’s destructive, encouraging conspiracy, harmful, and false. Yes the government, the media, advertising, marketing, public intellectuals, professors and teachers can no longer say comforting false things, and that your protection as a consumer made every single person in a company responsible for telling the truth and doing the reciprocal, ethical, moral thing, or they are open to prosecution. Yes it means that there will be a flurry of court cases as we build up a body of law for the many new conditions the law must cover, but this is what we do all the time, and we are very, very good at it. And it is very hard to be found guilty if you have in fact been careful with your words. And of course, no one cares about petty individual slip ups. We all make them. It is however different when it’s in the media, or from a public intellectual or politician attempting to inform the public or frame public discourse.. I suspect a rapid decline in news and a rapid shift in what remains, and that twitter and Facebook will have very serious problems if they are publishers, and as such will shift to platforms. And very quickly we will go back to a much less politicized, much more peaceful, much more prosocial civilization.”

  • How Will P-Law on Truthful and Reciprocal Public Speech Affect Me, and Our Lives?

      We’re decreasing tolerance for, and extending the liability for, the truthfulness and reciprocity we already enforce in contracts, selling, marketing and advertising, to all speech in public to the public, on matters of the public, making it impossible for anyone, including you, marketers, professors, intellectuals, media, and politicians, say anything they can’t testify to in court, because it is testifiable, and reciprocal. Meaning you must limit your public speech in public, to the public in matters public, especially for persona, economic or political gains, to what you can demonstrate you know enough to testify to, and that you can demonstrate you are not advocating, encouraging, or causing, the imposition of costs upon others without their fully informed, voluntary exchange. The only objection you can have is if you want engage in false and or irreciprocal speech. This means we will restore libel, slander, harmful gossip (undermining), psychologizing and moralizing (undermining instead of explaining the rational incentives of the people involved), suggestion(implying but not stating), obscurantism (hiding the truth), all left attempts at using the government to take rather than exchange between us, and all left attempts at lying about humans, our psychological, social, economic, and political orders. In other words, it will restore our informational commons to only that which one warrants is not false and not hurtful or harmful, or you will pay the price as if you did so in court. This means you can say whatever you want as long as it’s a constructive, a compromise exchange, helpful, and true. It means you cant say anything that’s destructive, encouraging conspiracy, harmful, and false. Yes the government, the media, advertising, marketing, public intellectuals, professors and teachers can no longer say comforting false things, and that your protection as a consumer made every single person in a company responsible for telling the truth and doing the reciprocal, ethical, moral thing, or they are open to prosecution. Yes it means that there will be a flurry of court cases as we build up a body of law for the many new conditions the law must cover, but this is what we do all the time, and we are very, very good at it. And it is very hard to be found guilty if you have in fact been careful with your words. And of course, no one cares about petty individual slip ups. We all make them. It is however different when it’s in the media, or from a public intellectual or politician attempting to inform the public or frame public discourse.. I suspect a rapid decline in news and a rapid shift in what remains, and that twitter and Facebook will have very serious problems if they are publishers, and as such will shift to platforms. And very quickly we will go back to a much less politicized, much more peaceful, much more prosocial civilization.”

  • “Lying, fraud, libel, slander, misrepresentation, misleading, suggestion, loadin

    —“Lying, fraud, libel, slander, misrepresentation, misleading, suggestion, loading, framing, obscuring, baiting into hazard, advocacy of, conspiracy of, involuntary transfer, is illegal. All speech is promissory, testimony, and is warrantied, and you’re liable for its consequences.”—Even simpler version