Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • Human Needs Aren’t Human Rights

    HUMAN NEEDS AREN’T HUMAN RIGHTS

    —“I can’t have a right to food, but I can have a right to eat.”– JWP

    There are no pre-existing fundamental rights. Only a natural demand for certain necessary rights. We can and do work together to produce those rights. What you mean is that it is beneficial. But one cannot POSSIBLY exercise a right that was not created by others, and one cannot possibly exercise a positive right that places demands upon others. As such all existentially possible rights are only via negativa: freedom from harm by others. There are many desirable GOODS that we might work together to obtain. There are however no existential rights no matter how much we pay wish there work (or lie that there are).

  • Human Needs Aren’t Human Rights

    HUMAN NEEDS AREN’T HUMAN RIGHTS

    —“I can’t have a right to food, but I can have a right to eat.”– JWP

    There are no pre-existing fundamental rights. Only a natural demand for certain necessary rights. We can and do work together to produce those rights. What you mean is that it is beneficial. But one cannot POSSIBLY exercise a right that was not created by others, and one cannot possibly exercise a positive right that places demands upon others. As such all existentially possible rights are only via negativa: freedom from harm by others. There are many desirable GOODS that we might work together to obtain. There are however no existential rights no matter how much we pay wish there work (or lie that there are).

  • The Origin of Institutional Law

    THE ORIGIN OF INSTITUTIONAL LAW

    —“Dear mr Doolittle, How to avoid bloodfeuds and endless vengeance in a society based on rule of natural law(reciprocity)?”—Sietze Bosman @fryskefilosoof

    I don’t understand… wait… ok. Here… Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, insured by, and settled by, the court and sheriffs, by forcible restitution, punishment, prevention, and prohibition on further retaliation by parties. It’s uncommon knowledge that the origin of all customary and political law is the resolution of disputes between families or clans, because of the excessive cost and consequence of retaliation cycles (feuds). As such, the polity insures peaceful settlement w/ law, court, jury.

  • The Origin of Institutional Law

    THE ORIGIN OF INSTITUTIONAL LAW

    —“Dear mr Doolittle, How to avoid bloodfeuds and endless vengeance in a society based on rule of natural law(reciprocity)?”—Sietze Bosman @fryskefilosoof

    I don’t understand… wait… ok. Here… Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, insured by, and settled by, the court and sheriffs, by forcible restitution, punishment, prevention, and prohibition on further retaliation by parties. It’s uncommon knowledge that the origin of all customary and political law is the resolution of disputes between families or clans, because of the excessive cost and consequence of retaliation cycles (feuds). As such, the polity insures peaceful settlement w/ law, court, jury.

  • American Constitutional History – and Its Future

    • IE-EUROPEAN CUSTOMARY LAW –
    • THE FIRST SEMITIC DARK AGE –
    • THE SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE –

    THE EUROPEAN BRONZE AGE 1) The European IE Customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected Kings. 2) The proto germanic customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings THE MEDITERRANEAN AGE 3) The Greek customary Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings. 4) The Roman Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy. FALL OF ROME AND END OF MEDITERRANEAN TRADE 5) The Germanic Continental Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and inherited Monarchy. 6) Germanic Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy. 7) The Anglo Saxon Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – (Families) THE NORMAN CONQUEST: UNIFICATION INTO ENGLISH COMMON LAW 8) ~1066 – Attempted unification of differences in anglo saxon law, and norman ‘privilege’. Primarily concerned with the conflcit between customary (folk) law and privilege. 9) THE NOBILITY’S VETO – THE MAGNA CARTA RESTORATION OF RIGHTS ~1215 – Magna Carta 1215. Restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR – THE RESTORATION OF RIGHTS 1) ~1664 – The English Common Law and the British Constitution, restoring sovereignty, reciprocity THE AMERICAN WAR OF SECESSION 2) ~1776 – The Declaration, The Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation 3) ~1789 – The Constitution, and Bill of RIghts – restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – but failing to ARTICULATE them. THE FIRST (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION 4) ~1812 – The North’s Attempted Secession over the war of 1812 with England. THE SECOND (MAJOR) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION 4) ~1865- The Constitution of Oppression of the Southern States over the south’s secession and control of westward expansion. THE THIRD (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 5) ~1933 – The Left’s Attempt At Conquest, imitating the semitic conquest of Russia, by FDR. THE FOURTH AMERICAN CIVIL WAR (SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE) 6) ~1965 – The Constitution of Oppression of Ethnic Europeans by the reversal of the demand for integration into the rule of law, christian ethics, market meritocracy, and the self sufficiency of the absolute nuclear family – and the undermining of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy -THE RESTORATION- THE FIFTH CIVIL WAR (THE RESTORATION) 7) ~2020 – The Restoration of the Constitution Natural Law, and the Retaliation against the Second Attempt At Destruction of Western Civilization – by restoration of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy.

  • American Constitutional History – and Its Future

    • IE-EUROPEAN CUSTOMARY LAW –
    • THE FIRST SEMITIC DARK AGE –
    • THE SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE –

    THE EUROPEAN BRONZE AGE 1) The European IE Customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected Kings. 2) The proto germanic customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings THE MEDITERRANEAN AGE 3) The Greek customary Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings. 4) The Roman Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy. FALL OF ROME AND END OF MEDITERRANEAN TRADE 5) The Germanic Continental Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and inherited Monarchy. 6) Germanic Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy. 7) The Anglo Saxon Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – (Families) THE NORMAN CONQUEST: UNIFICATION INTO ENGLISH COMMON LAW 8) ~1066 – Attempted unification of differences in anglo saxon law, and norman ‘privilege’. Primarily concerned with the conflcit between customary (folk) law and privilege. 9) THE NOBILITY’S VETO – THE MAGNA CARTA RESTORATION OF RIGHTS ~1215 – Magna Carta 1215. Restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR – THE RESTORATION OF RIGHTS 1) ~1664 – The English Common Law and the British Constitution, restoring sovereignty, reciprocity THE AMERICAN WAR OF SECESSION 2) ~1776 – The Declaration, The Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation 3) ~1789 – The Constitution, and Bill of RIghts – restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – but failing to ARTICULATE them. THE FIRST (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION 4) ~1812 – The North’s Attempted Secession over the war of 1812 with England. THE SECOND (MAJOR) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION 4) ~1865- The Constitution of Oppression of the Southern States over the south’s secession and control of westward expansion. THE THIRD (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 5) ~1933 – The Left’s Attempt At Conquest, imitating the semitic conquest of Russia, by FDR. THE FOURTH AMERICAN CIVIL WAR (SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE) 6) ~1965 – The Constitution of Oppression of Ethnic Europeans by the reversal of the demand for integration into the rule of law, christian ethics, market meritocracy, and the self sufficiency of the absolute nuclear family – and the undermining of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy -THE RESTORATION- THE FIFTH CIVIL WAR (THE RESTORATION) 7) ~2020 – The Restoration of the Constitution Natural Law, and the Retaliation against the Second Attempt At Destruction of Western Civilization – by restoration of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy.

  • The only Test Is Demonstrated Behavior

    —“Values testing to become a citizen of P-topia?”—Andrew M Gilmour

    The Propertarian Institute We don’t need to do anything except create a law, and universal standing, that prosecutes falsehood and irreciprocity such that we create a market for the prosecution of those who do so. The only test is demonstrated behavior. Let em in. Crucify the violators. Until there are no violators. In other words, common law is permissive with heavy punishment in order to allow the greatest fastest adaptation to opportunity. Continental law is reculatory and restrictive, with limited punishments in order to limit conflicts at the expense of adaptation to opportunity. Other law codes only get worse from continanal on down.

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Soverei

    What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty? https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/what-if-any-people-have-not-resisted-our-truth-telling-reciprocity-and-sovereignty/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 15:01:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267471240375218176

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Soverei

    What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty? https://t.co/rJrwEmmoYN

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty?

    WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY? What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic, and political social sciences? Everyone’s just fine with the logical and material: math, accounting, medicine, and technology that assists them in consumption, but everyone has resisted Individual Heroism, Testimonial Truth, Truth Before Face, Civic Duty, Civic Production of Commons, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law of Property and Tort, an Independent Judiciary, Markets in Everything, the Absolute Nuclear Family, and personal responsibility and accountability, and the eugenics that result from all of the above.. So every group has wanted to increase consumption, or seek power, but who has done anything other than fight against truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, a The church throughout our history; the monarchies until the 17th century; The French in the 18th century, the Marxists in the 19th century, The Jews last century, the jews and russians, and now the muslims this century, a repeat of the chinese totalitarian ambitions in this century, a repeat of the french totalitarian ambitions in europe this century. Everyone wants consumption. No one wants responsibility. Yet we made consumption possible because we took responsibility.