—“Lying, fraud, libel, slander, misrepresentation, misleading, suggestion, loading, framing, obscuring, baiting into hazard, advocacy of, conspiracy of, involuntary transfer, is illegal. All speech is promissory, testimony, and is warrantied, and you’re liable for its consequences.”—Even simpler version
Theme: Reciprocity
-
“Lying, fraud, libel, slander, misrepresentation, misleading, suggestion, loadin
-
(dark humor) —“If we install P-Law, and truthful speech in public, Can I still
(dark humor)
—“If we install P-Law, and truthful speech in public, Can I still troll leftists?”– @MartianHoplite —“If you can find any left.”–CD
-
Why Define Natural Rights?
Why Define Natural Rights? https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/why-define-natural-rights/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 12:48:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267437849504350208
-
Why Define Natural Rights?
Why Define Natural Rights? https://t.co/X2IeCXLg8T
-
Why Define Natural Rights?
Just as entropy must be articulated as physics, chemistry, biology, etc, Natural Law must be articulated as natural rights for the simple reason that it’s not possible to correctly deduce all applications of entropy without the requisite domain knowledge, or is it possible to correctly deduce all applications of reciprocity without requisite domain knowledge – although when stated that way it’s kind of helpful.
-
Why Define Natural Rights?
Just as entropy must be articulated as physics, chemistry, biology, etc, Natural Law must be articulated as natural rights for the simple reason that it’s not possible to correctly deduce all applications of entropy without the requisite domain knowledge, or is it possible to correctly deduce all applications of reciprocity without requisite domain knowledge – although when stated that way it’s kind of helpful.
-
We Have No Choice. Equality in Reciprocity or In Poverty
We Have No Choice. Equality in Reciprocity or In Poverty https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/we-have-no-choice-equality-in-reciprocity-or-in-poverty-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 12:12:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267428708111003655
-
We Have No Choice. Equality in Reciprocity or In Poverty
We Have No Choice. Equality in Reciprocity or In Poverty https://t.co/ydncTZv1JB
-
We Have No Choice. Equality in Reciprocity or In Poverty
Our only possibilities are equality in reciprocity or equality in ignorance, superstition, and absolute poverty. There is no choice. It’s just physics. Humans have memories, predictions from memories, and ability to choose to act on those predictions, so that we can outwit time in ways physical processes lacking memory, prediction, choice, and action cannot. However that only allows us to benefit from physical processes not deny or circumvent them. We are as physically constrained as is the rest of the universe. And our only substantial advantage is that the ability to imitate, empathize, sympathize, predict futures from them, and choose to cooperate on those possible futures, is so much more efficient and provides so many greater returns, that we can do a bit better than the rest of life forms – at least with our limits – to convert more calories, and continuously increase our consumption through continuous expansion of cooperation. But in doing so we form Pareto distributions of influence, in order to obtain Nash equilibriums of rewards. And that is a physical necessity of physical reality. We don’t have any choice. We are not wealthier than cave men, our only asset is time. Through cooperation we have made the purchasing power of time increase over and over again throughout history, although disproportionately so with the invention of aristotielainsim, and even more so with the mastery of heat, steam, electricity, chemistry, and now information.
-
We Have No Choice. Equality in Reciprocity or In Poverty
Our only possibilities are equality in reciprocity or equality in ignorance, superstition, and absolute poverty. There is no choice. It’s just physics. Humans have memories, predictions from memories, and ability to choose to act on those predictions, so that we can outwit time in ways physical processes lacking memory, prediction, choice, and action cannot. However that only allows us to benefit from physical processes not deny or circumvent them. We are as physically constrained as is the rest of the universe. And our only substantial advantage is that the ability to imitate, empathize, sympathize, predict futures from them, and choose to cooperate on those possible futures, is so much more efficient and provides so many greater returns, that we can do a bit better than the rest of life forms – at least with our limits – to convert more calories, and continuously increase our consumption through continuous expansion of cooperation. But in doing so we form Pareto distributions of influence, in order to obtain Nash equilibriums of rewards. And that is a physical necessity of physical reality. We don’t have any choice. We are not wealthier than cave men, our only asset is time. Through cooperation we have made the purchasing power of time increase over and over again throughout history, although disproportionately so with the invention of aristotielainsim, and even more so with the mastery of heat, steam, electricity, chemistry, and now information.