Really? The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws are written indelibly and unavoidably in the fabric of the universe. Do you deny physical and evolutionary laws, and do you grant reciprocity to the enemy, and do you practice a variation of the enemy’s cult and logic?
Reply addressees: @Keksistance @oscara7oscargeh
Theme: Reciprocity
-
Really? The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws are written indelibly and u
-

photos_and_videos/MobileUploads_lTr6tULrvg/109741711_339272857470874_47864309782
photos_and_videos/MobileUploads_lTr6tULrvg/109741711_339272857470874_478643097822134118_n_339272854137541.jpg John mark did in no way repudiate propertarianism- just the opposite. He said so in his final post on Patreon that’s still up.
Instead we both repudiated the dissident right as hopeless chimps – and that our 18 month effort to make those subhuman animals into a political movement couldn’t succeed. Just like every other attempt failed by everyone else.
No matter what we do, what our goals what our solutions or what our tactics if the chimps don’t get schoolyard brawls to watch vicariously from behind the safety of your basement keyboards they’ll just do all they know how to do – and that’s fling ape feces at everyone who tries.
So we gave up on them. Too dumb. And so we shift back to policy, patriots, normiecons, 2A, militia, and take advantage of the fact that chimps’ve given us media legitimacy by hating us. Which is the only strategic value they (cowards) can provide. 😉
And yes I really enjoy disrespecting the mouth breathers. I’d rather pander to the enemy and insult them while appealing to men who shut up, and show up for a war we can win on our terms while the morons hand victory to the enemy playing constantly into their hands, traps, and baiting.
Which we obviously didn’t. And they were too stupid to get it. 😉
And yes, John mark videos are on the Propertarian institute channel on YouTube.
(Secret: John is to P Institute as Pam the CBS Executive was to Craig Ferguson’s Late Night. Marketers are easily hired. But in our case monetization has to pay fir them. At 100k, we only hit 1/2 the necessary market to do that. And the institute can’t get in a position where we are dependent on donors capable of funding that kind of production quality. So when you find out your marketing strategy is largely pulling in the attention of enemies, and only 1% quality people, then it’s a simple business decision: Shift to more substantive content, patriots, 2A, and adults who will spread our policy advice, and distance ourselves from the illiterate sh-t flinging white chimps.
I feel a lot more relaxed now that we’ve done that. I started an intellectual movement. It’s worked and it’s working. But it will work better when counter signaling the dissident right chimps, addressing adults, and feeding the militias and activists content.
Right wing Chimps are … tiring.John mark did in no way repudiate propertarianism- just the opposite. He said so in his final post on Patreon that’s still up.
Instead we both repudiated the dissident right as hopeless chimps – and that our 18 month effort to make those subhuman animals into a political movement couldn’t succeed. Just like every other attempt failed by everyone else.
No matter what we do, what our goals what our solutions or what our tactics if the chimps don’t get schoolyard brawls to watch vicariously from behind the safety of your basement keyboards they’ll just do all they know how to do – and that’s fling ape feces at everyone who tries.
So we gave up on them. Too dumb. And so we shift back to policy, patriots, normiecons, 2A, militia, and take advantage of the fact that chimps’ve given us media legitimacy by hating us. Which is the only strategic value they (cowards) can provide. 😉
And yes I really enjoy disrespecting the mouth breathers. I’d rather pander to the enemy and insult them while appealing to men who shut up, and show up for a war we can win on our terms while the morons hand victory to the enemy playing constantly into their hands, traps, and baiting.
Which we obviously didn’t. And they were too stupid to get it. 😉
And yes, John mark videos are on the Propertarian institute channel on YouTube.
(Secret: John is to P Institute as Pam the CBS Executive was to Craig Ferguson’s Late Night. Marketers are easily hired. But in our case monetization has to pay fir them. At 100k, we only hit 1/2 the necessary market to do that. And the institute can’t get in a position where we are dependent on donors capable of funding that kind of production quality. So when you find out your marketing strategy is largely pulling in the attention of enemies, and only 1% quality people, then it’s a simple business decision: Shift to more substantive content, patriots, 2A, and adults who will spread our policy advice, and distance ourselves from the illiterate sh-t flinging white chimps.
I feel a lot more relaxed now that we’ve done that. I started an intellectual movement. It’s worked and it’s working. But it will work better when counter signaling the dissident right chimps, addressing adults, and feeding the militias and activists content.
Right wing Chimps are … tiring.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 14:06:00 UTC
-
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law,
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law, and commons – because it’s another fraud like marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, and neoconservatism. It’s bait, argued by suggestion, to lure well-meaning fools into the hazard of failure.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:40:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287744556281331712
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287567292197371905
-
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law,
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law, and commons – because it’s another fraud like marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, and neoconservatism. It’s bait, argued by suggestion, to lure well-meaning fools into the hazard of failure.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
There is only one source of liberty, and that is armed men with sufficient force
There is only one source of liberty, and that is armed men with sufficient force to demand rule of law by self-determination, legal sovereignty, by reciprocity, adjudicated in an adversarial market(jury) of peers. Jews never had sovereignty, liberty, and never used reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:37:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287743989207236610
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287567292197371905
-
There is only one source of liberty, and that is armed men with sufficient force
There is only one source of liberty, and that is armed men with sufficient force to demand rule of law by self-determination, legal sovereignty, by reciprocity, adjudicated in an adversarial market(jury) of peers. Jews never had sovereignty, liberty, and never used reciprocity.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
Rothbardian ethics of Ghetto and Pale, were designed with malice of forethought
Rothbardian ethics of Ghetto and Pale, were designed with malice of forethought NOT to equal European rule of law of reciprocity in interests both public and private. So that the Jewish method of fraud by baiting into hazard could persist, and European retaliation prohibited.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
Rothbardian ethics of Ghetto and Pale, were designed with malice of forethought
Rothbardian ethics of Ghetto and Pale, were designed with malice of forethought NOT to equal European rule of law of reciprocity in interests both public and private. So that the Jewish method of fraud by baiting into hazard could persist, and European retaliation prohibited.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:31:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287742519044972545
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287567292197371905
-
“Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestio
“Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestion: any idiot will agree he wants to be free of aggression. But every idiot will also substitute his definition of property(interests) to aggress against. Ergo, the statement is absolutely meaningless.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
“Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestio
“Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestion: any idiot will agree he wants to be free of aggression. But every idiot will also substitute his definition of property(interests) to aggress against. Ergo, the statement is absolutely meaningless.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:29:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287741891761573888
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287567292197371905