Theme: Reciprocity

  • STOP MORALIZING ABOUT THE LEFT – ITS YOUR WEAKNESS If you’re looking for recipro

    STOP MORALIZING ABOUT THE LEFT – ITS YOUR WEAKNESS

    If you’re looking for reciprocity, intellectual honesty, and consistency from the left you’re not going to get it.

    There is only one way to negotiate with those who practice disinformation.

    And that’s to show up in big numbers.

    Moralizing is just self sedation. Self comforting. Denial.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 12:53:00 UTC

  • HOW DOES JESUS EXTEND (COMPLETE) NATURAL LAW? —“Can you elaborate on how you s

    HOW DOES JESUS EXTEND (COMPLETE) NATURAL LAW?

    —“Can you elaborate on how you see Jesus as having extended natural law into a via-positiva? I’ve seen you describe Jesus’ contribution as providing the underclass access to virtue by way of excessive forgiveness. If the forgiveness is admittedly excessive, isn’t this a violation of reciprocity?”—James Hargraves

    The natural law of reciprocity tells us what’s negative – what not to do. Christian charity tells us what positive – what to do: forgive until baiting into cooperation doesn’t work. So Christian forgiveness provides the via Positiva for natural law.

    Do not unto others, what they would not have done unto them. Do unto others only as you would have done unto you; Forgive what others do unto you – until you know better. This third charge is the uniqueness of Christianity. The first two which Christians claim are universal in all cultures, ad always have been.

    The prisoner’s dilemma is the thought experiment (and the computer model we use) for testing game theories of cooperation and the incentive to trust (or cheat).

    Exhaustive forgiveness (tit-for-tat) solves the prisoner’s dilemma game. In other words, it is the optimum strategy fo identifying and sorting the pervasively immoral from the potentially moral. In almost all cases, including the most addicted and criminal, people who are not otherwise mentally ill, will eventually fall to ‘seduction’ into cooperation.

    Christianity produced both i) this trust between people, and ii) limited tribal and familial retaliation cycles that plagued the ancient world, and iii) made more complex polities, then iv) more complex trade, and business possible because people just stopped cheating one another first and cooperated trustfully first – at least in northern Europe (not southern). Even in the middle east if it didn’t increase trust it cut retaliation cycles – hence old Lebanon’s advantage in the area.

    This is why Protestant Christianity produces commons-based wealth: it makes everyone forgiving and brings into being what we think of as commercial ethics. And why Catholic and Orthodox Christianity create peaceful reasonably trusting commons (not governments). Both Catholic and Orthodox fail at the problem of politics. Protestant hasn’t although it appears to be a function of germanic military tradition not differences in Christian teaching.

    Christianity does not do its work without the military and militia (germanic north). Catholic Christianity was profoundly corrupt – and no different from Marxist-pomo schools and universities today. This isn’t true of Protestantism which because of local funding makes corruption very difficult, or orthodoxy, which assisted rather than fought with and competed with the state and the people.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 22:53:00 UTC

  • Try to falsify reciprocity. Try. Same for rational choice. You won’t. You can’t.

    Try to falsify reciprocity. Try. Same for rational choice. You won’t. You can’t. Reciprocity is a rational choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 20:08:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286755170852966403

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286753333135302656

  • Try to falsify reciprocity. Try. Same for rational choice. You won’t. You can’t.

    Try to falsify reciprocity. Try. Same for rational choice. You won’t. You can’t. Reciprocity is a rational choice.

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 @TruthQuest11

  • VIRTUES DOMINANCE VIRTUES heroism (adversarial risk) and excellence (adversarial

    VIRTUES

    DOMINANCE VIRTUES

    heroism (adversarial risk) and

    excellence (adversarial superiority), and

    beauty (adversarial plenty).

    COOPERATION VIRTUES

    Justice or Reciprocity by reason

    Prudence, Temperance or self-moderation, by reason

    Fortitude or brave endurance by reason

    SUBMISSIVE VALUES

    Humility

    Kindness, Charity

    Chastity


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 15:59:00 UTC

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11 1) Sh

    RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11 1) Show me any evidence in history that law must be justified?…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:55:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286630984188862464

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11 1) Sh

    RT @curtdoolittle: @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11 1) Show me any evidence in history that law must be justified?…

  • 1) Show me any evidence in history that law must be justified? 2) If P is false

    1) Show me any evidence in history that law must be justified?
    2) If P is false then falsify reciprocity as providing decidability in matters of conflict.
    3) If P is false then falsify the P-Truth checklist.
    4) P explains lang, psych. soc. law, as extensions of physical laws.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:54:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286630947966853121

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286514642785677312

  • 1) Show me any evidence in history that law must be justified? 2) If P is false

    1) Show me any evidence in history that law must be justified?
    2) If P is false then falsify reciprocity as providing decidability in matters of conflict.
    3) If P is false then falsify the P-Truth checklist.
    4) P explains lang, psych. soc. law, as extensions of physical laws.

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11

  • YES, YOU CAN GO FULL FASH … RULE OF LAW OF RECIPROCITY FASCISM 😉 —“You can

    YES, YOU CAN GO FULL FASH … RULE OF LAW OF RECIPROCITY FASCISM 😉

    —“You can go from classical liberal to libertarian to reactionary to full FASH. You can. I know. I did….. And not cause of some silly boyhood attraction to symbolism, or want of power. But because it’s the logical conclusion of the study of political economy: Nationalist, Mixed Economy, Zero Tolerance, Rule of Law. It’s the optimum group strategy, polity, economy, and system of decidability. The zero-tolerance thing is easy once you have Rule of Law of Reciprocity. There isn’t any argument possible against it other than right to defecate in the community gene pool. and you know, sorry. No. You don’t get to soil the gene pool.” — – Curt Doolittle

    (humor)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 13:00:00 UTC