THE CHOICE EPISODE 0003 – Q&A: CATHOLICISM, CHRISTIANITY, TRIFUNCTIONALISM, AND NATURAL LAW.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-08 02:01:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104651299349069274
THE CHOICE EPISODE 0003 – Q&A: CATHOLICISM, CHRISTIANITY, TRIFUNCTIONALISM, AND NATURAL LAW.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-08 02:01:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104651299349069274
One can also avoid superstition, magic, and deceits and the abrahamic method of lying by just telling the truth and practicing reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-31 19:47:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289286556415488001
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @grahamjthorne @financydrew
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289286336562647042
One can also avoid superstition, magic, and deceits and the abrahamic method of lying by just telling the truth and practicing reciprocity.
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @grahamjthorne @financydrew
I’m not sure why this is so difficult for you.
Let’s try again. My work consists of (a) an explanation of the Grammars, (b) the operational grammar (c) reciprocity and (d) testimony within it (e) strict construction of arguments with it. (f) strict construction of law from it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-30 15:26:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288858472965197832
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288848881317486592
I’m not sure why this is so difficult for you.
Let’s try again. My work consists of (a) an explanation of the Grammars, (b) the operational grammar (c) reciprocity and (d) testimony within it (e) strict construction of arguments with it. (f) strict construction of law from it.
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3
Explain Aristotelianism, PLatonism, Confucianism, Abrahamism, and Hinduism “simply”.
Explain that law can be written like software, in a formal operational logic, and that reciprocity in display word and deed (including truthful speech) can be required by that law. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1288525452412420097
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 17:31:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288527521693261824
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1288525452412420097
Explain Aristotelianism, PLatonism, Confucianism, Abrahamism, and Hinduism “simply”.
Explain that law can be written like software, in a formal operational logic, and that reciprocity in display word and deed (including truthful speech) can be required by that law. https://t.co/aqhCAVa5Yy
It doesn’t provide a means of determining what is not aggressable, and it tolerates blackmail for example (see my debate with walter block)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-28 02:59:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287945644599054336
Reply addressees: @joanlarma @JadeBai85455803 @billtalts @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287943094999166976
It doesn’t provide a means of determining what is not aggressable, and it tolerates blackmail for example (see my debate with walter block)
Reply addressees: @joanlarma @JadeBai85455803 @billtalts @JulieBorowski
Really? The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws are written indelibly and unavoidably in the fabric of the universe. Do you deny physical and evolutionary laws, and do you grant reciprocity to the enemy, and do you practice a variation of the enemy’s cult and logic?
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 21:49:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287867740322017280
Reply addressees: @Keksistance @oscara7oscargeh
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287861019008741382