Theme: Property

  • The Propertarian Question

    Mar 2, 2020, 12:40 PM THE PROPERTARIAN QUESTION (core) “Why is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization?” EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; WHERE … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, THEREBY … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, THEREBY … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. THEREFORE Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment. THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATIONAND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization. II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation. III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s) IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)

    1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
      … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
      … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
      … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
      … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
      … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
      … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

    V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.) THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION

    1. Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
    2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
    3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
    4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
    5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
      (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
    6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
    7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
    8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
    9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples

    THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction. All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason. LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets. THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that

    (a)  While christianity is compatible with natural law, Abrahamic religion as practiced is incompatible with testimonial truth;

    (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man;

    (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • The Propertarian Question

    Mar 2, 2020, 12:40 PM THE PROPERTARIAN QUESTION (core) “Why is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization?” EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; WHERE … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, THEREBY … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, THEREBY … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. THEREFORE Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment. THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATIONAND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization. II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation. III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s) IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)

    1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
      … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
      … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
      … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
      … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
      … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
      … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

    V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.) THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION

    1. Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
    2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
    3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
    4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
    5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
      (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
    6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
    7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
    8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
    9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples

    THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction. All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason. LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets. THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that

    (a)  While christianity is compatible with natural law, Abrahamic religion as practiced is incompatible with testimonial truth;

    (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man;

    (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • Q: The propertarian view on lending with interest?

    Q: The propertarian view on lending with interest? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/q-the-propertarian-view-on-lending-with-interest/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 20:37:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266468783830466565

  • Q: The propertarian view on lending with interest?

    Mar 5, 2020, 1:25 PM

    —“What would be the propertarian view on lending with interest? Or investment banking?”—

    Interest is necessary for temporal calculation of production, distribution and trade, but not for consumption. All end point interest, meaning consumer credit on capital purchases (durable goods) under fiat money(a fractional share in the economy) is rent seeking (prohibited). Houses, boats, cars, appliances, furniture, clothing etc – anything not entertainment is rent seeking. If we exchange zero interest for accelerated payments we dont disrupt the pricing system (rapidly) but we do rapidly make children affordable. Similarly there appears to be little value in private insurance against catastrophe. Anything that can be calculated with that degree of statistical precision, yet it subject to the creation of rent seeking and hazard in the business side, can be done without the business side as a non-profit treasury run piece of infrastructure.

  • Q: The propertarian view on lending with interest?

    Mar 5, 2020, 1:25 PM

    —“What would be the propertarian view on lending with interest? Or investment banking?”—

    Interest is necessary for temporal calculation of production, distribution and trade, but not for consumption. All end point interest, meaning consumer credit on capital purchases (durable goods) under fiat money(a fractional share in the economy) is rent seeking (prohibited). Houses, boats, cars, appliances, furniture, clothing etc – anything not entertainment is rent seeking. If we exchange zero interest for accelerated payments we dont disrupt the pricing system (rapidly) but we do rapidly make children affordable. Similarly there appears to be little value in private insurance against catastrophe. Anything that can be calculated with that degree of statistical precision, yet it subject to the creation of rent seeking and hazard in the business side, can be done without the business side as a non-profit treasury run piece of infrastructure.

  • The Banning of Cousin Marriage as The Creation of Subservience

    Mar 8, 2020, 12:05 PM THE BANNING OF COUSIN MARRIAGE IN THE WEST BEGAN EARLY – BAN COUSIN MARRIAGE, USE PROPERTY RIGHTS, CREATE A UNIVERSAL MILITIA

    —“In September 506 C.E., the fathers of what would later become the Roman Catholic Church gathered in southern France to draw up dozens of new laws. Some forbade clergy from visiting unrelated women. Others forbade Christians from marrying anyone more closely related than their third cousin. The authors of a sweeping new study say that last, seemingly trivial prohibition may have given birth to Western civilization as we know it. “If the authors are right, or even in the vicinity of being right, it couldn’t be bigger,” says Stephen Stich, a philosopher and cognitive scientist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, who wasn’t involved in the work. “What they are offering to explain is the emergence of democratic institutions, of individualism in the West.” The church’s early ban on incest and cousin marriage, the researchers say, weakened the tight kinship structures that had previously defined European populations, fostering new streaks of independence, nonconformity, and a willingness to work with strangers. And as the church’s influence spread, those qualities blossomed into a suite of psychological traits common today across Western industrialized nations, they argue.”—

  • The Banning of Cousin Marriage as The Creation of Subservience

    Mar 8, 2020, 12:05 PM THE BANNING OF COUSIN MARRIAGE IN THE WEST BEGAN EARLY – BAN COUSIN MARRIAGE, USE PROPERTY RIGHTS, CREATE A UNIVERSAL MILITIA

    —“In September 506 C.E., the fathers of what would later become the Roman Catholic Church gathered in southern France to draw up dozens of new laws. Some forbade clergy from visiting unrelated women. Others forbade Christians from marrying anyone more closely related than their third cousin. The authors of a sweeping new study say that last, seemingly trivial prohibition may have given birth to Western civilization as we know it. “If the authors are right, or even in the vicinity of being right, it couldn’t be bigger,” says Stephen Stich, a philosopher and cognitive scientist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, who wasn’t involved in the work. “What they are offering to explain is the emergence of democratic institutions, of individualism in the West.” The church’s early ban on incest and cousin marriage, the researchers say, weakened the tight kinship structures that had previously defined European populations, fostering new streaks of independence, nonconformity, and a willingness to work with strangers. And as the church’s influence spread, those qualities blossomed into a suite of psychological traits common today across Western industrialized nations, they argue.”—

  • Two Topics. Constitutionality, Taxation Methods

    —“Is not the graduated income tax (communist manifesto) that is dysgenic? Also worth noting: the Supreme Court in Pollack v. Farmers Loan Trust Co. in 1895 ruled the income tax unconstitutional.”—Scott De Warren

    I. Constitutionality of the Income tax. … 1. the court did its job by correctly ruling that according to the constitution, the federal government could not enact any tax that was not apportioned to the states by population (a flat tax). … 2. The constitution did it’s job correctly by forcing the legislature to pass a constitutional amendment permitting the income tax. … 3. The legislature did its job correctly by passing a constitutional amendment through the amendment process. … 4. The states did their jobs by passing the constitutional amendment through the amendment process. I do not see the problem with the income tax per se, but with the amount of it, and the uses that it was put to. So the income tax is a slippery slope. The answer to the slippery slope is quite simple – if it redistributes reproduction downward it’s bad. If it constrains reproduction its bad. But that was exactly what the communists wanted – underclass paradise parasitic extraction from the meritocratic classes thereby reversing the benefits of thousands of years of eugenic practices by our ancestors. II. Taxes … 1. a graduated income tax is fine if it’s outside the reproductive cost curve. In other words, if it doesn’t affect reproduction. … 2. A flat tax regulates taxation best by keeping it low … 3. Fees rather than taxes eliminate discretion. … 4. Direct economic voting controls the misuse of fees. … 5. This combination of taxes forces the construction of voluntary commons (civil society). a. Commons are by nature always redistributive (flat fees). b. Income Taxes are by nature redistributive of benefits. c. Flat taxes by their nature redistribute burden. d. Fees by nature meritocratic. The answer is fees. Keeping an account of all inputs and outputs per person would provide evidence necessary for policy. Having each generation pay for the rearing of their children, and children paying for the retirement and care of their parents creates eugenic incentives. Ending false-education and credit-financialization so you (a) pay for children when young, (b) save when mature, (c) are independent when aged, and (d) insured by your children, (e) passed on your inheritance to them in toto as compensation, would restore the intergenerational system of building healthy families of sufficient size and restoring long term thinking to the polity, rather than all this short term consumer consumptionism. There is a reason that the left suppresses data collection that would show white men > 35 and < 65 support the entirety of the population, and that women consume 70% of resources, and spend 70% of income such that this is an incredibly unequal system of benefits in favor of women. The P-Constitution does all this.

  • Two Topics. Constitutionality, Taxation Methods

    —“Is not the graduated income tax (communist manifesto) that is dysgenic? Also worth noting: the Supreme Court in Pollack v. Farmers Loan Trust Co. in 1895 ruled the income tax unconstitutional.”—Scott De Warren

    I. Constitutionality of the Income tax. … 1. the court did its job by correctly ruling that according to the constitution, the federal government could not enact any tax that was not apportioned to the states by population (a flat tax). … 2. The constitution did it’s job correctly by forcing the legislature to pass a constitutional amendment permitting the income tax. … 3. The legislature did its job correctly by passing a constitutional amendment through the amendment process. … 4. The states did their jobs by passing the constitutional amendment through the amendment process. I do not see the problem with the income tax per se, but with the amount of it, and the uses that it was put to. So the income tax is a slippery slope. The answer to the slippery slope is quite simple – if it redistributes reproduction downward it’s bad. If it constrains reproduction its bad. But that was exactly what the communists wanted – underclass paradise parasitic extraction from the meritocratic classes thereby reversing the benefits of thousands of years of eugenic practices by our ancestors. II. Taxes … 1. a graduated income tax is fine if it’s outside the reproductive cost curve. In other words, if it doesn’t affect reproduction. … 2. A flat tax regulates taxation best by keeping it low … 3. Fees rather than taxes eliminate discretion. … 4. Direct economic voting controls the misuse of fees. … 5. This combination of taxes forces the construction of voluntary commons (civil society). a. Commons are by nature always redistributive (flat fees). b. Income Taxes are by nature redistributive of benefits. c. Flat taxes by their nature redistribute burden. d. Fees by nature meritocratic. The answer is fees. Keeping an account of all inputs and outputs per person would provide evidence necessary for policy. Having each generation pay for the rearing of their children, and children paying for the retirement and care of their parents creates eugenic incentives. Ending false-education and credit-financialization so you (a) pay for children when young, (b) save when mature, (c) are independent when aged, and (d) insured by your children, (e) passed on your inheritance to them in toto as compensation, would restore the intergenerational system of building healthy families of sufficient size and restoring long term thinking to the polity, rather than all this short term consumer consumptionism. There is a reason that the left suppresses data collection that would show white men > 35 and < 65 support the entirety of the population, and that women consume 70% of resources, and spend 70% of income such that this is an incredibly unequal system of benefits in favor of women. The P-Constitution does all this.

  • That’s the deal.

    Mar 14, 2020, 11:22 AM

    Your body, your children, my capital, my polity. That’s the deal. No More Lies