Theme: Property

  • Property in Toto (capital) Is Not an Opinion

    Property in Toto (capital) Is Not an Opinion https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/property-in-toto-capital-is-not-an-opinion/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 22:30:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266859518748696577

  • Property in Toto (capital) Is Not an Opinion

    Nov 29, 2019, 1:31 PM I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity. So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’. So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution. That’s what I do: law.

  • Property in Toto (capital) Is Not an Opinion

    Nov 29, 2019, 1:31 PM I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity. So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’. So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution. That’s what I do: law.

  • I’m Just Measuring Changes in Capital

    —“You are the one insisting on specific terms and frameworks. -Lol. Are there measures of insulation and protection? Yes. Are they self sufficient and unrelated to everything else? No. See, you have a box you’re comfortable playing in, but reality extends way beyond its walls.”—

    I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity. So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’. So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution. That’s what I do: law. So it doesn’t matter what people think is good or agree is good what matters is that when in dispute science (law) provides decidability. Art is decidable as is nearly everything. There is no difference between science and law. We just like lying and cheating … a lot. —“Laws in science are merely pragmatic dependabilities and measurements which are artificially created and imposed by humans. Law in government is always a matter of subjective expression that requires interpretation. Laws only exist because of subjective humans.”—Jason Powell @KillerkattArt A scientific law is a description (langauge) of constant relations extant in the universe at (so far) increasing degrees of precision (and parsimony). There is nothing subjective about ohms law. nothing. There is nothing subjective about Reciprocity. Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible. So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that are rarely if ever ‘law’.

  • Will American Capitalism Still Exist in 100 Years?

    Dec 27, 2019, 3:36 PM America doesn’t practice capitalism it practices rule of law, and as a consequence of rule of law, people are limited to survival in markets. Because western civilization began entrepreneurially, developed promise and contract, tort law and property, testimony and jury, we have long standing institutions for enforcing contracts, and long standing tradition of high trust. So for these reasons we could develop large scale organizations using contracts. These large scale organizations using contracts could organize a lot of money behind entrepreneurial ventures. Because of a combination of rule of law of tort, contracts, and large organizations, we could create high production capacity using high capital investment in machines, without resorting to central government control, militarizing people, serfdom or slavery to organize people into large working groups. And using this combination of law, contract, jury, large organizations, and technological innovation, we could drag humanity – resisting us, kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the chaos of natural forces, at the cost of creating uncertainty. So people traded poverty and certainty for prosperity and uncertainty. And people continue to make the choice every day. The communists (jews) invented the terms capitalism as a criticism, and socialism and communism as a false promise, as a means of restoring certainty and control over their lives. But neither socialism or communism is possible because both suffer from the four big problems of lack of incentives, and therefore laziness, the inability to use prices to efficiently organize an economy, and endemic corruption by state managed industries and the government, and the tendency of the people to vote themselves or demand themselves into tragedies ofthe commons: consumption higher than production. What the future will bring? In advanced countries one child policies: Automation will continue to drive down human labor markets until only a third of people, or maybe a fifth of people, can find employment, nd those people who work will end democracy and rule the people that can’t. The end result will be eugenics that suppressed the reproduction and consumption of those people who are unable to participate in production distribution and trade. IN poor countries they will forgo automation and continue to use labor, which will produce subsistence level for the poor and a small wealthy class. Just Like the rest of history.

  • Will American Capitalism Still Exist in 100 Years?

    Dec 27, 2019, 3:36 PM America doesn’t practice capitalism it practices rule of law, and as a consequence of rule of law, people are limited to survival in markets. Because western civilization began entrepreneurially, developed promise and contract, tort law and property, testimony and jury, we have long standing institutions for enforcing contracts, and long standing tradition of high trust. So for these reasons we could develop large scale organizations using contracts. These large scale organizations using contracts could organize a lot of money behind entrepreneurial ventures. Because of a combination of rule of law of tort, contracts, and large organizations, we could create high production capacity using high capital investment in machines, without resorting to central government control, militarizing people, serfdom or slavery to organize people into large working groups. And using this combination of law, contract, jury, large organizations, and technological innovation, we could drag humanity – resisting us, kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the chaos of natural forces, at the cost of creating uncertainty. So people traded poverty and certainty for prosperity and uncertainty. And people continue to make the choice every day. The communists (jews) invented the terms capitalism as a criticism, and socialism and communism as a false promise, as a means of restoring certainty and control over their lives. But neither socialism or communism is possible because both suffer from the four big problems of lack of incentives, and therefore laziness, the inability to use prices to efficiently organize an economy, and endemic corruption by state managed industries and the government, and the tendency of the people to vote themselves or demand themselves into tragedies ofthe commons: consumption higher than production. What the future will bring? In advanced countries one child policies: Automation will continue to drive down human labor markets until only a third of people, or maybe a fifth of people, can find employment, nd those people who work will end democracy and rule the people that can’t. The end result will be eugenics that suppressed the reproduction and consumption of those people who are unable to participate in production distribution and trade. IN poor countries they will forgo automation and continue to use labor, which will produce subsistence level for the poor and a small wealthy class. Just Like the rest of history.

  • Our Genome is our property

    Our Genome is our property. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/our-genome-is-our-property/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 15:27:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266753025961533445

  • Our Genome is our property.

    Jan 29, 2020, 4:12 PM Our Genome is our property. Yes. Why? Because we and our ancestors demonstrated interest in it. And we defend it. Therefore it is. Now, you know, we’re happy to get rid of the bottom, as a sacrifice for improving the genomes of others. But that doesn’t mean you can consume our commons.

  • Our Genome is our property.

    Jan 29, 2020, 4:12 PM Our Genome is our property. Yes. Why? Because we and our ancestors demonstrated interest in it. And we defend it. Therefore it is. Now, you know, we’re happy to get rid of the bottom, as a sacrifice for improving the genomes of others. But that doesn’t mean you can consume our commons.

  • The Propertarian Question

    The Propertarian Question https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/the-propertarian-question-2/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:32:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266482562702233600