Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • Actually what I’m saying is, that those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.All

    Actually what I’m saying is, that those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.All else is at their permission.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 12:56:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799005444665345

    Reply addressees: @daemoskisame @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DaemosKisame

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump so what your saying is. WAAAH I WANT IF I DONT GET MY WAY IMMA THROW A FIT LIKE A LIL BITCH WAH GIMME BOTTLE

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

  • So what you’re saying is that you rally and shame to cover your thefts? 😉

    So what you’re saying is that you rally and shame to cover your thefts? 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 11:57:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793784198305898496

    Reply addressees: @daemoskisame @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DaemosKisame

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump so what your saying is. WAAAH I WANT IF I DONT GET MY WAY IMMA THROW A FIT LIKE A LIL BITCH WAH GIMME BOTTLE

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

  • THE TEN PLANKS OF THE COSMOPOLITAN COMMUNISTS 1. Abolition of private property a

    THE TEN PLANKS OF THE COSMOPOLITAN COMMUNISTS

    1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.

    (The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management.)

    2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

    (Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State “income” taxes. We call it “paying your fair share”.)

    3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

    (We call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.)

    4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

    (We call in government seizures, tax liens, Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.)

    5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

    (We call it the Federal Reserve which is a credit/debt system nationally organized by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).)

    6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State.

    ( We call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver’s licenses and Department of Transportation regulations. )

    7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

    ( We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Evironmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations. )

    8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

    ( We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Fedral Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000. )

    9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

    ( We call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136. )

    10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.

    ( People are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education” . )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 10:31:00 UTC

  • Rule of Religion used ostracization for non-conformity to norms. Rule of law use

    Rule of Religion used ostracization for non-conformity to norms.

    Rule of law used punishment for failure to respect property rights.

    Rule of credit used deprivation for failure to keep pace with the red queen.

    Rule of slavery was immoral as hell but to some degree necessary.

    Rule of serfdom was immoral but survivable.

    Rule of religion was imperfect but arguably moral

    Rule of law was perfect but certainly moral

    Rule of credit is absolutely positively immoral.

    Consumer capitalism is one thing.

    Rule by credit is simply the most effective kind of slavery ever invented.

    End the ability to weaponize credit.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-29 16:53:00 UTC

  • IT’S NOT A DEBATE. IT’S A LESSON. —“If you’re still practicing or advocating t

    IT’S NOT A DEBATE. IT’S A LESSON.

    —“If you’re still practicing or advocating the low trust, maximization of efficiency and profits of Rothbardian Ghetto Ethics, then you have to just trust me that you’re wrong. And, “If you don’t like what we tell you to believe in, we’ll kill ya.” It’s not a debate it’s a lesson. A one-way conversation, and that’s how I’m going to carry it forward.”–Sven Sontag

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 09:16:00 UTC

  • WHY SOME SMART PEOPLE THINK PROPERTARIANISM IS ‘STUPID SHIT’. —“I seem to unde

    WHY SOME SMART PEOPLE THINK PROPERTARIANISM IS ‘STUPID SHIT’.

    —“I seem to understand what Curt says and proposes, but many smart people I hold in high esteem seem to think it’s all stupid shit. I don’t know if I’m dumb for not seeing what they see or if there’s a breakdown of communication between the two groups or WTF.”—Elcid Campeador

    It’s a language problem. How do you talk about comparative experience, psychology, ethics, sociology, politics, economics, and group competitive strategy – all of which are heavily loaded, with normative, moral, and metaphysical value judgments, and even pseudoscientific and scientific judgments.

    Property rights theory provided a language for small-scale interpersonal cooperation. Money, finance, economics for larger scale cooperation. Haidt provided a connection between evolutionary biology and moral instincts. I translated that connection into property and financial language. Then I translated cognitive science and psychology into that language. Then I translated political argument into the same language. Then I translated group evolutionary strategy into the same language.

    So it sounds like word salad if you don’t know what I’m doing. If you have some experience with both the philosophy of science, AND finance AND economics, it’s a bit easier.

    And that’s the reason aspies like it: because it’s very precise language, and it doesn’t require that you intuit emotional priors. So the people who are very good at it quickly have an autistic bent.

    And the people who find it confusing have an intuitionistic bias, and I (we) are asking them to climb a steeper learning curve – to re-learn at personal cost, rather than just learn in order to solve a personal problem of desiring a language to express what they already speak.

    You can’t imagine how hard it was to learn to write and speak this way. It’s a lot like writing software – syntactically unforgiving. It took me years and years of work to incrementally evolve from completely incomprehensible to kicking off a few insights, to appealing to aspies, to slowly and painfully learn to express these ideas to normal people.

    So most critics don’t know all of that. They want ‘meaning’ from communication. But my work is designed to solve the problem of the Cosmopolitans and the Jews before them: how to make it extremely difficult to engage in deceit of the human mind by error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, loading and framing, overloading, propaganda, pseudoscience, and deceit.

    So while most people want DISCOUNTED METHOD of obtaining meaning, my work is designed to impose costs on meaningful speech so that lying and fraud is almost impossible.

    But once you start thinking in human operations, voluntary transfers, costs and premiums and discounts, then you eventually think very differently, and you see (correctly) that all human speech is either honest negotiation for mutual gain, or practical attempt at deceit for the purpose of obtaining a discount at someone else’s expense.

    And that’s when the light bulbs start going on and the world appears as a very different place.

    So I completely understand why people think it’s nonsense.

    That’s because for a class of people it solves a problem (very analytical people) a cost of learning – and for another class of people it imposes a problem: a cost of re-learning.

    Note that I used propertarian reasoning to explain this difference in behaviors. It is a very powerful language for commensurable argument of diverse portfolios of cognitive, moral, cultural, and metaphysical bias and priors.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 07:37:00 UTC

  • Property, Family, Clan, Tribe, and Nation are unnatural to women. They are the m

    Property, Family, Clan, Tribe, and Nation are unnatural to women.

    They are the means by which we domesticated them.

    And they rebel against them whenever given the opportunity.

    We evolved to kill competitors to capture, herd, and domesticate women so that we could control our reproduction.

    Women are universalist for the simple reason that they are always captors, and so they seek the most secure captor.

    Why does this matter? Because we are exceptionally good at domesticating males – they’re much more dangerous in the short term. But we forget that while we developed many institutions to domesticate males, we created just as many to domesticate women.

    It is also true that the purpose of monogamy was to domesticate undesirable males.

    This asymmetry between women and men and marriage is the institutional problem we have not yet solved.

    Many more men are undesirable than women are undesirable.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 14:37:00 UTC

  • DEFINITIONS: PARTICULARISM VS UNIVERSALISM Particularism: “Exclusive attachment

    DEFINITIONS: PARTICULARISM VS UNIVERSALISM

    Particularism: “Exclusive attachment to one’s own group, party, or nation.”

    1) Individualism vs Collectivism …(PROPERTY)

    2) Particularism vs Universalism .(PEOPLE)

    3) Nationalism ..vs Globalism …..(GOVERNMENT)

    ——————————————————–

    ….MASCULINE..VS…FEMININE

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 14:36:00 UTC

  • So to an honest man wealth is a resource and entrust is an investment. A dishone

    So to an honest man wealth is a resource and entrust is an investment. A dishonest man moralizes instead.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:48:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790882706980757504

    Reply addressees: @harrison_partch @SnapPopCrackle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880774451032064

  • “Curt : what property has Monsanto violated?”— Great question. 1) Monsanto is

    —“Curt : what property has Monsanto violated?”—

    Great question.

    1) Monsanto is following the normal evolutionary cycle of organizations from specialists to generalists to guardians. All polities go through a phase where they pollute until they are wealthy enough to demand non-pollution due to consumer and citizen demand. The same is true of companies, and the same is true of families. All organizations create EXTERNALITIES during their youth and adolescence, and only in maturity do they produce positive externalities, and only in old age to they produce largely aesthetic externalities.

    2) Monsanto is a biotechnology company that has found itself so successful that it has transformed into an industrial farming company, to an international shipping and distribution company, but has failed to transform into an ‘aesthetic’ company (as did the robber barons).

    3) Monsanto commits an objective series of crimes:

    a) social disruption (imposition of costs) on local people

    b) the export of a nation’s wealth (the source of their profits really)

    c) the bribery and corruption of developing country officials (you should see Ukraine)

    d) externalizing immediate costs, and externalizing risk that they cannot perform restitution for through pollution

    e) externalizing risk that they cannot warranty that they can perform restitution through GMO.

    4) The current movement against Monsanto is a demand that they transform into a company that seeks social status for its aesthetics in exchange for preserving its markets.

    5) This is the same process that religions use to control governments, the same process that people used to control warrior nobility, and the same process that consumers use to constrain companies, and the same process that women use to constrain alpha males: imposing opportunity costs and increasing transaction costs, by means of ridicule, gossip, shaming, and rallying.

    PROPERTARIANISM

    I would say that the reason that this problem exists is that people cannot appeal in court to a judge and thereby stop everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 08:08:00 UTC