Theme: Property

  • Wealth is not the same word as resource, and invest is not the same word as entr

    —Wealth is not the same word as resource, and invest is not the same word as entrust—

    This is true if and only if the resource and investment valued with equal emotion by all. But it isn’t.

    The fact that I eschew attempts at falsely stating a homogeneity of interests is why I use unloaded verse.

    Conversely, the reason people use loaded verse is to deceive: to cast as universal that which is particular

    So to an honest man wealth is a resource and entrust is an investment. A dishonest man moralizes instead.

    Commons are created by the surrender of opportunities for violence, theft, fraud, deceit, and free riding.

    Just as much as commons are created by the contribution of time, effort, and resources.

    Western High Trust Society was built by forgoing early marriage and reproduction, free riding, and deceit.

    Just as much as it was by the aggressive suppression of violence, theft, and fraud.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 08:05:00 UTC

  • All of Haidt’s moral foundations are expressible as property rights (or obligati

    All of Haidt’s moral foundations are expressible as property rights (or obligations).


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 15:48:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790580831828017152

    Reply addressees: @Mike10four @SnapPopCrackle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790557473832710144


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Mike10four

    @SnapPopCrackle @curtdoolittle The link between “natural law” and the physical laws of nature.
    https://t.co/FCpkaXQLwO

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790557473832710144

  • And our moral intuitions are all reducible to changes in the state of assets bot

    And our moral intuitions are all reducible to changes in the state of assets both concrete and abstract.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 15:48:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790580727045824516

    Reply addressees: @Mike10four @SnapPopCrackle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790557473832710144


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Mike10four

    @SnapPopCrackle @curtdoolittle The link between “natural law” and the physical laws of nature.
    https://t.co/FCpkaXQLwO

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790557473832710144

  • How is my labor, my thought, my time, my wealth invested in the state? What abou

    How is my labor, my thought, my time, my wealth invested in the state? What about the opportunities I don’t seize? See?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 08:10:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790465452648632321

    Reply addressees: @SnapPopCrackle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790437586535710721


    IN REPLY TO:

    @SnapPopCrackle

    @curtdoolittle How is violence a freaking resource that can be “invested” in the state?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790437586535710721

  • I BET YOU DIDN’T THINK OF THAT (I think very few people who read me understand t

    I BET YOU DIDN’T THINK OF THAT

    (I think very few people who read me understand the consequences of my emphasis on consent limited by the one law of non-imposition of costs against property in toto: the result is a eugenic meritocracy wherein groups will self-sort by kin out of self-interest and necessity. Markets make nationalism too you know. But I bet you didn’t think of that. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-22 10:55:00 UTC

  • EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY The only Anarchy that can exist is a condition of

    EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY

    The only Anarchy that can exist is a condition of Sovereignty. Under Sovereignty one can have possessions, but not property. One can have possession but not ownership. But Sovereignty requires relative invulnerability. So to create sovereignty we form alliances with others who desire sovereignty by the exchange of reciprocal insurance. To resolve conflicts between us without violating sovereignty, we can only appeal to the universal decidability of natural law. We accumulate decisions under natural law in the common law. Under reciprocal insurance, natural law, and common law’s norms, we leave behind possessions and create ownership and property. By the combination of sovereignty, exchange of insurance, common law, and the accumulation of decisions, and openness of the contract for reciprocal defense of sovereignty, we create that order we call sovereignty for ourselves. But slaves are more profitable than Enemies. Serfs are more profitable than slaves. citizens are more profitable than serfs. So to increase our defenses, increase our dominion, and increase our wealth, we extend sovereignty, to the citizenry, thus creating a condition of liberty. one possesses sovereignty by ability. one possesses liberty by permission. One possesses freedom out of utility. One possesses subsidy (redistribution) out of charity. There is only one source of sovereignty: the organized application of violence to prevent all alternatives. There is only one source of liberty: the permission of those who fight for sovereignty. There is only one reason that the sovereign grant liberty: profitability. There are only one means of demanding liberty from the sovereign: enfranchisement through reciprocal insurance by violence, or by raising the cost of the absence of liberty through the organized application of violence. Wishful thinking is just lying to yourself and others. That’s the domain of religion. In the domain of truth, there is only one source of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy: the organized application of violence.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 21:01:00 UTC

  • I will propose the third angle: That property rights increase incentives, ideati

    http://johnquiggin.com/2016/10/16/locke-nozick-locke/#comment-274067John

    I will propose the third angle:

    That property rights increase incentives, ideation, productivity, risk tolerance, opportunity creation, monetary and economic velocity. And as a consequence produce higher returns ( commissions or taxes ) for the minority who imposed property rights over the objections of the rent seeking majority. And as a consequence upward distribution of returns slowly domesticates ( reduces the reproduction of ) the lower classes, further accelerating cooperation.

    This is in fact the process that occurred in Europe.

    Painful truths are still truths.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-16 14:04:00 UTC

  • Why Are We Not Better Off Killing, Dispossessing Or Enslaving You?

    WHY ARE WE NOT BETTER OFF KILLING, DISPOSSESSING OR ENSLAVING YOU? The fact that I don’t kill you, enslave you, or dispossess you, and instead cooperate with you for mutual benefit, does not include the presumption that I will sacrifice for you. If I must sacrifice for you then I am better of killing, enslaving, or dispossessing you. You presume too much. contribution to commons, and insurance against vicissitudes of nature, are not the same as redistribution allowing you to increase your consumption and reproduction.

    Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • Why Are We Not Better Off Killing, Dispossessing Or Enslaving You?

    WHY ARE WE NOT BETTER OFF KILLING, DISPOSSESSING OR ENSLAVING YOU? The fact that I don’t kill you, enslave you, or dispossess you, and instead cooperate with you for mutual benefit, does not include the presumption that I will sacrifice for you. If I must sacrifice for you then I am better of killing, enslaving, or dispossessing you. You presume too much. contribution to commons, and insurance against vicissitudes of nature, are not the same as redistribution allowing you to increase your consumption and reproduction.

    Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • So now we have a full sequence of causal relations between reproductive necessit

    So now we have a full sequence of causal relations between reproductive necessity and property rights in law. bio>moral>law.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-15 15:41:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/787317519120031744

    Reply addressees: @danielcraigb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/787116258990911489


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/787116258990911489