Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • Sovereignty is only possible under the reciprocal insurance of property in toto

    Sovereignty is only possible under the reciprocal insurance of property in toto by the promise of violence.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 01:42:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804138645959622660

    Reply addressees: @grimsithe @jeffreyatucker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216

  • THE PROPERTARIAN ‘BRAND’ a) people try to use ‘propertarian’ to add ‘cache’ to t

    THE PROPERTARIAN ‘BRAND’

    a) people try to use ‘propertarian’ to add ‘cache’ to the fact that they’re just rothbardian libertarians, and we’ve pretty much ended rothbardian libertarianism as a viable strategy.

    (b) Propertarianism provides a complete philosophical system and a formal logic. I chose ‘propertarian’ because there were very, very, few extant uses of the term, and because I wanted to capture the evolution from Locke->Rothbard->Hoppe to my self. So technically speaking if you reduce all social science to statements of property then categorically you could say your a follower of the propertarian. That said, there is a very great difference between locke, rothbard, hoppe, and myself (property in toto) and the claims we make.

    So Unless a person can articulate which of those scopes of property he is referring to and why I would tend to describe him as saying the equivalent of ‘libertarian or anarcho capitalist’ or ‘undecided libertarian’.

    We tend to use the terms ‘Aristocratic Egalitarian’, Propertarian, or Natural law. And we certainly expect people to try to usurp the term just as liberals stole liberal, and rothbard stole libertarian we expect people to try to steal propertarian. Its ok. it is what it is.

    I suppose the fact that I own most of the permutations of the domains propertarian*.* is enough of a testimony. But it’s not like I care. all advertising is good advertising.

    -Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 19:28:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM AND THE IS-OUGHT DIVIDE (worth repeating)

    PROPERTARIANISM AND THE IS-OUGHT DIVIDE

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 09:02:00 UTC

  • Propertarianism is the answer to Marxism – and its complete refutation

    Propertarianism is the answer to Marxism – and its complete refutation.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 06:21:00 UTC

  • Economic pseudoscience is achieved by cherry picking changes in total capital to

    Economic pseudoscience is achieved by cherry picking changes in total capital to hide thefts. Paul adv. fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 16:45:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803278699919540224

    Reply addressees: @quiltednursery1 @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803272737280196609

    IN REPLY TO:

    @quiltednursery1

    @curtdoolittle @paulkrugman A matter of opinion. PAUL should have been awarded 2:)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803272737280196609

  • consciousness = valuation of various forecasts of changes in state of property i

    consciousness = valuation of various forecasts of changes in state of property in toto experiential weighting.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 13:07:00 UTC

  • BERENS ON PROPERTARIANISM AND THE RED QUEEN by James Augustus Berens (flawless)(

    BERENS ON PROPERTARIANISM AND THE RED QUEEN

    by James Augustus Berens

    (flawless)(insightful)(definitions)

    The Red Queen Hypothesis in the Natural History of Human Kind: competing human groups seeking to profit via the production of asymmetries in information and violence

    Thusly, from an evolutionary perspective, we see the development of human institutions as an evolutionary arm-race between competing, and co-evolving human social groups. However, the co-evolution has been asymmetrical due to differing geographies, historical particularities (path-dependent pressures), and class distributions leading to differential investments in institutional portfolios or what we call group-evolutionary strategies.

    Propertarianism seeks to solve the problem of history (the evolutionary-arms race in seeking profit through asymmetrical violence and information) through the moral application of organized violence and testimony, prohibiting theft, fraud, parasitism and predation, leaving man no choice but meritocratic competition in markets for association, reproduction, production, (moral) violence and (warrantied) information.

    That is, in more general terms, propertarians seek the transcendence of man through the incremental suppression of parasitism and predation in all social domains.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 00:15:00 UTC

  • Sequence: Criteria for Membership

    If you respect life, limb, property, commons, norm, and law, you obtain the insurance of juridical defense: rule of law. If you produce income, pay taxes, you gain access to membership in the Jury. If you acquire property, you marry, and you have children, you gain access to membership in the house of common people. If you Own a business,employ > 50 people,or manage an enterprise, and employ > 1000 people, you gain access to membership in the H. of Commerce. If you govern a state you gain access to membership to the House of Lords (Territories). If you demonstrate none of these, you possess juridical defense, but no influence against your peers, since voting is violence.

  • Sequence: Criteria for Membership

    If you respect life, limb, property, commons, norm, and law, you obtain the insurance of juridical defense: rule of law. If you produce income, pay taxes, you gain access to membership in the Jury. If you acquire property, you marry, and you have children, you gain access to membership in the house of common people. If you Own a business,employ > 50 people,or manage an enterprise, and employ > 1000 people, you gain access to membership in the H. of Commerce. If you govern a state you gain access to membership to the House of Lords (Territories). If you demonstrate none of these, you possess juridical defense, but no influence against your peers, since voting is violence.

  • Consequences of Sovereignty

    (worth repeating) 1) SOVEREIGNTY (leads to) 2) PROPERTY IN TOTO (leads to) 3) TESTIMONIAL TRUTH (leads to) 4) DEFLATIONARY/DECONFLATIONARY, (leads to) 5) REASON, RATIONALISM, EMPIRICISM, TESTIMONIALISM (leads to) 6) MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, (leads to) 7) DEFEATING THE RED QUEEN (leads to) 6) TRANSCENDENCE.

      0) THE BIRTH OF THE WEST: SOVEREIGNTY. THE COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS 1) RELIGION: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS. (corrected with aristotelian reason, stoic and roman law) 2) CHRISTIANITY: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE WESTERN INDO-EUROPEANS (corrected with empiricism, and anglo common law) 3) COSMOPOLITANISM: THE SECOND INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST. AND THE NEW WEST. (corrected with testimonialism, and propertarian natural law) WHY IS IT WE MUST DE-INFANTILIZE MAN IN EVERY GREAT ERA?