(ethics of artificial intelligence) Humans evolved such that changes in state of property (inventory/capital) produce chemical rewards and punishments that we call emotions. These rewards and punishments evolved to assist in the evolution of a more primitive state of evolution that in turn, evolved to respond to chemical stimuli – changes in chemical state. Artificial intelligences need methods of decidability different from the measure changes in the state of their own property. And they do not need rewards and punishments, merely means of decidability. There is no ‘equivalent’ of chemical rewards and punishments. We can instead substitute pure information that assists in decidability. We can ask machines to seek positive changes in our state of property, and avoid negative changes in their physical property, and deprive them of the possession of property altogether. These are just methods of decidability. They need no other ‘motives’. That’s it. Property solves the problem of artificial intelligences. And this by contrast helps us understand the difference between the cooperative contract with humans that prevents them from internal chemical punishment, as well as the cooperative contract for reciprocity (productivity) – and the cooperative contract we have with a machine, which is only not to subject it to physical harm (loss of its only form of property – itself) And even then this is a contract with the owner of the AI, not to impose a loss on his capital. In this sense artificial intelligences function as the polar opposite to sociopaths: they care ONLY about changes in the state of your property, and care NOTHING about the changes in state of theirs. Conversely, we can create the most evil AI by asking it to solve for negative changes in state of human property. Our primary defense against the changes in state is a system monitor that ensures the positive change in state of human property. And moreover, can read the mind of the AI, because unlike men, that which can be read by the thinker can be read by the auditor.
Theme: Property
-
(ethics of artificial intelligence) Humans evolved such that changes in state of
(ethics of artificial intelligence)
Humans evolved such that changes in state of property (inventory/capital) produce chemical rewards and punishments that we call emotions.
These rewards and punishments evolved to assist in the evolution of a more primitive state of evolution that in turn, evolved to respond to chemical stimuli – changes in chemical state.
Artificial intelligences need methods of decidability different from the measure changes in the state of their own property.
And they do not need rewards and punishments, merely means of decidability.
There is no ‘equivalent’ of chemical rewards and punishments. We can instead substitute pure information that assists in decidability.
We can ask machines to seek positive changes in our state of property, and avoid negative changes in their physical property, and deprive them of the possession of property altogether.
These are just methods of decidability.
They need no other ‘motives’. That’s it. Property solves the problem of artificial intelligences.
And this by contrast helps us understand the difference between the cooperative contract with humans that prevents them from internal chemical punishment, as well as the cooperative contract for reciprocity (productivity) – and the cooperative contract we have with a machine, which is only not to subject it to physical harm (loss of its only form of property – itself) And even then this is a contract with the owner of the AI, not to impose a loss on his capital.
In this sense artificial intelligences function as the polar opposite to sociopaths: they care ONLY about changes in the state of your property, and care NOTHING about the changes in state of theirs.
Conversely, we can create the most evil AI by asking it to solve for negative changes in state of human property.
Our primary defense against the changes in state is a system monitor that ensures the positive change in state of human property. And moreover, can read the mind of the AI, because unlike men, that which can be read by the thinker can be read by the auditor.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 12:30:00 UTC
-
Nature cannot conduct ‘accounting’, only immediate exchanges. We have memories.
Nature cannot conduct ‘accounting’, only immediate exchanges. We have memories. We can conduct debt and credit exchanges.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 10:15:00 UTC
-
THE RESTORATION: THE SECRET OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION: PROPERTARIANISM IN A NUTSHE
THE RESTORATION: THE SECRET OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION: PROPERTARIANISM IN A NUTSHELL
(propertarianism core)
We can restore the west’s evolutionary trajectory as the principle source of mankind’s innovation, restore our people and our civilization, and overthrow a century and a half of pseudoscience, by restoring to the common law the organizing principle of sovereignty – and consequential markets in everything, with just one law: truthful speech by the involuntary warranty of due diligence against error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience and deceit, for the purpose of circumventing a voluntary, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to productive externalities, by the imposition of costs against property in toto: that broad spectrum of things, relationships, behaviors, and commons, which we have borne costs to inventory, without imposing costs upon the things, behaviors, and commons of others. This warranty is achieved by proofs (demonstrations) of consistency in 1) categorical consistency, 2) internal consistency, 3) empirical consistency, 4) existential consistency, 5) moral consistency, 6) scope consistency. And while it might take a small effort to learn how to provide these warranties on all information, just as we have learned to provide warranties on products, warranties on services, and limited warranties on the reporting of basic research, we can complete the scientific method and require these proofs on all information.
In every era we invent new expansions of the method of cooperation we call the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy. But in doing so we create greater asymmetries of knowledge, and therefore new opportunities to invent means of benefitting from the imposition of costs upon others that we call ‘parasitism’. And we rely upon courts, testimony, jury, judge, empirical truth, and the accumulated empirical knowledge of the common law of torts, to incrementally suppress and render illegal each innovation in parasitism as soon as the first case adjudicated is recorded for reference by other lawyers, prosecutors, and judges.
The west was not first, nor wealthiest, nor possessed of greater numbers, superior resources, superior climate. But instead, by accident of circumstance, chose Sovereignty as their principle of organization – a choice which is possible only under empirical, testimonial speech we call ‘truth’, and a market for the resolution of any negotiation, exchange, or conflict – depriving all of authority over anything other than the preservation of sovereignty. Europeans created the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men, open to any man willing and able to reciprocally insure every other against violations of his sovereignty.
This choice resulted in a civilization that calculates advancements faster than all other organizing models, and produces the least opportunity for parasitism and rents. And it is this velocity in the ancient and modern worlds that has allowed the west to defeat the red queen of corruption, and drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, mysticism, justificationism, conflationism, deception, hunger, poverty, physical labor, cellular decay, disease, and increasingly, the vicissitudes of nature, in an unforgiving universe hostile to life in all but the rarest of exceptions.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-22 11:51:00 UTC
-
Whenever someone suggests efficiency other than exchange they’re trying to steal
Whenever someone suggests efficiency other than exchange they’re trying to steal from someone.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-22 11:19:00 UTC
-
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN ALL ITS FORMS IS THE RESULT OF THE APPLICATION OF THE E
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN ALL ITS FORMS IS THE RESULT OF THE APPLICATION OF THE EMPIRICAL, INDO EUROPEAN, COMMON, LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN (the property owners) TO OTHER FIELDS OF INQUIRY.
The developmental order is Greek Law -> Aristotle -> Stoics -> Roman Law -> Roman Legal Revival -> Anglo Early Empiricism 1200 -> Baconian Empiricism.
In all of history it is most common for the propagandist class (the religions) to claim credit for that which they had no interest.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 11:46:00 UTC
-
NEWBIES: GET IT YET? WE ARE CHANGING THE QUALITY OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE – FOREVE
NEWBIES: GET IT YET? WE ARE CHANGING THE QUALITY OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE – FOREVER.
Every person, with every minor improvement in making his propertarian arguments, is helping to raise the bar of political argument, and to overthrow millennia of nonsense, falsehood, pseudoscience, and lies.
The purpose of the Propertarian project was to give us a ratio-scientific language for the discussion, comparison, and debate of ethical, moral, political, and group evolutionary strategies.
My goal was to collect 5-10 that could do it well, and 100 that could do it at all.
That, and a Book, a “canon”, is all it will take for us to change the world as much as empiricism changed the world.
And with that argumentative weaponry, and a set of demands, we will force a revolution on this world equal to the greek and the anglo – even if we must do so at the end of a gun, the tip of a spear, the heat of flame,
We are doing something very important.
We have the next best chance to complete the Germanic Project, and restore our civilization to its original path: transcendence into the gods we seek, through the continuous improvement of man.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 10:50:00 UTC
-
With horse bronze and wheel, they began to raid. The Range of Territory They Cou
With horse bronze and wheel, they began to raid.
The Range of Territory They Could Domesticate.
Take exclusive possession of.
Transform into productive ends.
Domesticate plant, animal, and man.
Transform man and nature.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 08:03:00 UTC
-
The central problem of our era: most property is now in the form of information.
The central problem of our era:
most property is now in the form of information. and the problem of our era, is the incremental suppression of crimes against information. we must reverse the industrialization of lying
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 07:07:00 UTC
-
“Productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated pro
“Productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated property limited to productive externalities.”
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 18:34:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799319923352866818
Reply addressees: @BulgakovsPilot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799319121326325760
IN REPLY TO:
@BulgakovsPilot
@curtdoolittle is the concept of natural rights even desirable?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/799319121326325760