Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • MARKETS, NOT FREE MARKETS 1) Markets(w/ limits) != Free Markets(w/o limits) 2) R

    MARKETS, NOT FREE MARKETS

    1) Markets(w/ limits) != Free Markets(w/o limits)

    2) Reciprocity under full accounting != Volition w/o full accounting.

    3) Sovereignty != Intersubjectively verifiable property.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-26 21:24:00 UTC

  • Markets, Not Free Markets

    1) Markets(w/ limits) != Free Markets(w/o limits) 2) Reciprocity under full accounting != Volition w/o full accounting. 3) Sovereignty != Intersubjectively verifiable property.

  • 1 – Markets, like ‘property rights’ require insurers, and production on speculat

    1 – Markets, like ‘property rights’ require insurers, and production on speculation of demand under inflexible prices. 2 – Trade requires only normative property, and production to satisfy estimated demand under flexible prices. 3 – Exchange requires only possession, and neither prices or anticipated demand. Demand always exists, whether under exchange, trade, or market. We tend to use the word market to refer to demand. But demand exists under exchange, trade, and market. The question is scale, investment risk, and institutions (insurance (law), contract, money, prices) that mitigate investment risk. We trade low volume and high prices for high volume and low prices. To achieve high volume and low prices requires an ever expanding division of capital(risk), knowledge, and labor, under ever greater insurance regimes.

  • 1 – Markets, like ‘property rights’ require insurers, and production on speculat

    1 – Markets, like ‘property rights’ require insurers, and production on speculation of demand under inflexible prices.

    2 – Trade requires only normative property, and production to satisfy estimated demand under flexible prices.

    3 – Exchange requires only possession, and neither prices or anticipated demand.

    Demand always exists, whether under exchange, trade, or market.

    We tend to use the word market to refer to demand. But demand exists under exchange, trade, and market. The question is scale, investment risk, and institutions (insurance (law), contract, money, prices) that mitigate investment risk.

    We trade low volume and high prices for high volume and low prices. To achieve high volume and low prices requires an ever expanding division of capital(risk), knowledge, and labor, under ever greater insurance regimes.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-25 13:21:00 UTC

  • 1 – Markets, like ‘property rights’ require insurers, and production on speculat

    1 – Markets, like ‘property rights’ require insurers, and production on speculation of demand under inflexible prices. 2 – Trade requires only normative property, and production to satisfy estimated demand under flexible prices. 3 – Exchange requires only possession, and neither prices or anticipated demand. Demand always exists, whether under exchange, trade, or market. We tend to use the word market to refer to demand. But demand exists under exchange, trade, and market. The question is scale, investment risk, and institutions (insurance (law), contract, money, prices) that mitigate investment risk. We trade low volume and high prices for high volume and low prices. To achieve high volume and low prices requires an ever expanding division of capital(risk), knowledge, and labor, under ever greater insurance regimes.

  • “So the military has a choice: engage in extraction, or protect the capitalists

    —“So the military has a choice: engage in extraction, or protect the capitalists ability to engage in fraud, or protect the court’s ability to administer natural law.”–Zachary Miller A militia has no choice but the court. An Army has the choice of the first two. An empire has only the first.

  • There exists only one form of meritocracy and that is the common, natural law of

    There exists only one form of meritocracy and that is the common, natural law of reciprocity we call ‘tort’. Western man was destroyed when the universal law of torts: the common natural law of reciprocity, was surrendered to the lies of democracy, capitalism, marxist-socialism, and postmodernism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-25 11:04:00 UTC

  • There exists only one form of meritocracy and that is the common, natural law of

    There exists only one form of meritocracy and that is the common, natural law of reciprocity we call ‘tort’. Western man was destroyed when the universal law of torts: the common natural law of reciprocity, was surrendered to the lies of democracy, capitalism, marxist-socialism, and postmodernism.

  • There exists only one form of meritocracy and that is the common, natural law of

    There exists only one form of meritocracy and that is the common, natural law of reciprocity we call ‘tort’. Western man was destroyed when the universal law of torts: the common natural law of reciprocity, was surrendered to the lies of democracy, capitalism, marxist-socialism, and postmodernism.

  • Propertarianism is not conciliatory or apologetic – it’s completely prosecutoria

    Propertarianism is not conciliatory or apologetic – it’s completely prosecutorial.