I mean, you can’t get around reciprocity as the measure of morality. You can’t get around property in toto as the test and limit of reciprocity. You can’t get around natural law of reciprocity as the means of dispute resolution. You can’t get around markets under natural law of reciprocity. You can’t get around the fact that goods services and information can be used to conduct thefts directly, indirectly, and by externality. You can’t get around the fact that you can only warranty what you can perform restitution for, and therefore what you can warranty limits the goods, services, and information that you can bring to market. You can’t get around the fact that even proposing an alternative to a market order is something you cannot warranty, and something that is de facto an attempted theft. You can’t get around the fact that no matter what order you want to produce can be produced through exchange. What you can’t get around and none of us can get around, is that the least able have behavior to trade – what they may not do, and the most able have talents to trade – what they may do. You can’t get around these things. Ever. As far as I know political science is solved. It will just require us to suppress parasitism in this world by political means the same way we have suppressed parasitism by violence, theft, fraud in goods and services. And the principle means of doing so is suppression of advocacy of parasitism by information. And to do that requires only that we publish the requirements for reciprocity in all speech. And it turns out, that is possible, and not all that difficult.
Theme: Property
-
“Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue
“Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue. The difference is that both man and nature seek to defeat entropy, man follows property in toto because he can choose to outwit the course of events, and nature can’t choose but take the first opportunity it stumbles upon. -
“Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue
“Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue. The difference is that both man and nature seek to defeat entropy, man follows property in toto because he can choose to outwit the course of events, and nature can’t choose but take the first opportunity it stumbles upon.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 14:57:00 UTC
-
“Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue
“Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue. The difference is that both man and nature seek to defeat entropy, man follows property in toto because he can choose to outwit the course of events, and nature can’t choose but take the first opportunity it stumbles upon. -
All Libertarians And Anarchists Are Just Parasites
–“Lying” and “stealing” are just normative terms (morality).— Domagoj Vaci Only if you’re a thief and a liar. Otherwise they’re empirical tests of irreciprocity, and they remove the incentive for cooperation and provide incentive for restitution, punishment, enslavement, and death. That’s basic science. The evidentiary record of that science is the record of disputes we call the law. The strong need an excuse not to kill, prey upon, or enslave the weak. Avoiding lying, stealing in all their forms are the only reason not to kill, prey upon, or enslave. That’s history. -
ALL LIBERTARIANS AND ANARCHISTS ARE JUST PARASITES –“Lying” and “stealing” are
ALL LIBERTARIANS AND ANARCHISTS ARE JUST PARASITES
–“Lying” and “stealing” are just normative terms (morality).— Domagoj Vaci
Only if you’re a thief and a liar. Otherwise they’re empirical tests of irreciprocity, and they remove the incentive for cooperation and provide incentive for restitution, punishment, enslavement, and death.
That’s basic science. The evidentiary record of that science is the record of disputes we call the law.
The strong need an excuse not to kill, prey upon, or enslave the weak. Avoiding lying, stealing in all their forms are the only reason not to kill, prey upon, or enslave.
That’s history.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-11 13:44:00 UTC
-
All Libertarians And Anarchists Are Just Parasites
–“Lying” and “stealing” are just normative terms (morality).— Domagoj Vaci Only if you’re a thief and a liar. Otherwise they’re empirical tests of irreciprocity, and they remove the incentive for cooperation and provide incentive for restitution, punishment, enslavement, and death. That’s basic science. The evidentiary record of that science is the record of disputes we call the law. The strong need an excuse not to kill, prey upon, or enslave the weak. Avoiding lying, stealing in all their forms are the only reason not to kill, prey upon, or enslave. That’s history. -
(On Discord) Guy asks me if I believe private property emerges. I say, well, it
(On Discord) Guy asks me if I believe private property emerges. I say, well, it emerges in concert with the complexity of cooperation. I say that by and large we created markets and property by suppression of parasitism. By suppressing parasitism we created markets. …. Then he jumps in and makes a completely unrelated argument (rant) about the production of commons. And that ‘states’ are necessary for those productions. And of course he brings up health care, roads, pyramids…. And I’m thinking. Um. You know, you just cut from bottom up construction to top down justification as if that’s a falsification. When we never got to the point in the bottom up construction. I mean…. jeez. morons, -
(On Discord) Guy asks me if I believe private property emerges. I say, well, it
(On Discord)
Guy asks me if I believe private property emerges. I say, well, it emerges in concert with the complexity of cooperation. I say that by and large we created markets and property by suppression of parasitism. By suppressing parasitism we created markets. ….
Then he jumps in and makes a completely unrelated argument (rant) about the production of commons. And that ‘states’ are necessary for those productions. And of course he brings up health care, roads, pyramids….
And I’m thinking. Um. You know, you just cut from bottom up construction to top down justification as if that’s a falsification. When we never got to the point in the bottom up construction.
I mean…. jeez.
morons,
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-11 13:29:00 UTC
-
(On Discord) Guy asks me if I believe private property emerges. I say, well, it
(On Discord) Guy asks me if I believe private property emerges. I say, well, it emerges in concert with the complexity of cooperation. I say that by and large we created markets and property by suppression of parasitism. By suppressing parasitism we created markets. …. Then he jumps in and makes a completely unrelated argument (rant) about the production of commons. And that ‘states’ are necessary for those productions. And of course he brings up health care, roads, pyramids…. And I’m thinking. Um. You know, you just cut from bottom up construction to top down justification as if that’s a falsification. When we never got to the point in the bottom up construction. I mean…. jeez. morons,