Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • RETURN TO RULE BY RULE OF LAW, MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, AND THE CONTINUOUS EVOLUTI

    RETURN TO RULE BY RULE OF LAW, MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, AND THE CONTINUOUS EVOLUTION OF THE ANIMAL MAN.

    We are the masters of the first asset: violence. Violence like any asset can be put to good, or to ill. We can return to the continuous domestication and husbandry of humans, animals, machines, and this earth – if not the universe. And in doing so evolve ourselves and man into gods. Or we can be victims of those who lack that ability.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 13:00:00 UTC

  • The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), a

    The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), and peasantry(socialism), is that each starts with a very different value attached to the different choices of cooperation: predation by violence, production by cooperative exchange, flight, boycott and resistance by inclusion or exclusion from the group. Aristocracy begins with the preference for ‘taking it all now’ by violence, and profiting from the domestication of animal man; Burghers (bourgeois) assume the continuous value of trade. And dependents, serfs,slaves, and enemies, seek to circumvent the competition and conflict by demand for redistribution (insurance, and sharing) because for all intents and purposes they are otherwise powerless. I start from the premise that continuous evolution of man through continuous suppression of inferiorities, and continuous reward for excellences, is the only long term good, and that the strong and productive must have incentive to tolerate the weak and the unproductive. There is no shortage of humans, but an oversupply. People are not intrinsically valuable to one another, to mankind, or to the universe. They can only strive to be, and demonstrate that they are, by the evidence of their actions.

  • The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), a

    The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), and peasantry(socialism), is that each starts with a very different value attached to the different choices of cooperation: predation by violence, production by cooperative exchange, flight, boycott and resistance by inclusion or exclusion from the group. Aristocracy begins with the preference for ‘taking it all now’ by violence, and profiting from the domestication of animal man; Burghers (bourgeois) assume the continuous value of trade. And dependents, serfs,slaves, and enemies, seek to circumvent the competition and conflict by demand for redistribution (insurance, and sharing) because for all intents and purposes they are otherwise powerless. I start from the premise that continuous evolution of man through continuous suppression of inferiorities, and continuous reward for excellences, is the only long term good, and that the strong and productive must have incentive to tolerate the weak and the unproductive. There is no shortage of humans, but an oversupply. People are not intrinsically valuable to one another, to mankind, or to the universe. They can only strive to be, and demonstrate that they are, by the evidence of their actions.

  • The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), a

    The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), and peasantry(socialism), is that each starts with a very different value attached to the different choices of cooperation: predation by violence, production by cooperative exchange, flight, boycott and resistance by inclusion or exclusion from the group. Aristocracy begins with the preference for ‘taking it all now’ by violence, and profiting from the domestication of animal man; Burghers (bourgeois) assume the continuous value of trade. And dependents, serfs,slaves, and enemies, seek to circumvent the competition and conflict by demand for redistribution (insurance, and sharing) because for all intents and purposes they are otherwise powerless.

    I start from the premise that continuous evolution of man through continuous suppression of inferiorities, and continuous reward for excellences, is the only long term good, and that the strong and productive must have incentive to tolerate the weak and the unproductive.

    There is no shortage of humans, but an oversupply.

    People are not intrinsically valuable to one another, to mankind, or to the universe. They can only strive to be, and demonstrate that they are, by the evidence of their actions.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 12:57:00 UTC

  • Becoming Gods

    I told everyone all along that if you understand Propertarianism, that like Copernicus’ universe, like Darwin’s evolution, and like artificial intelligence’s forthcoming consciousness, that knowledge is liberating and empowering but dehumanizing. Maturity comes at the cost of the comforts of ignorance and innocence. Awareness that you have superceded your fairy tales, superceded your impulses, superceded your parents, superseded, conventions, superseded legislation and regulation, superseded competitors, and superseded all but a few of mankind. Each step in the development of agency takes us farther toward calculation and farther away from the retreat into the animal brain of impulse instead of reason and submission to the pack instinct instead of rule. The universe is not kind. That is why it needs gods. And gods we can, must, and shall be. Although it is likely that not all of us can make the journey. For those that can, welcome to the post-human – to the language and thought of gods: one continuous set of relations from the fabric of the actionable universe to every potential transformation of it. Return to Paternal, Eugenic, Evolutionary Rule as our primary occupation. The incremental, intergenerational, production of gods. Man, warrior, craftsman, husband, father, judge, headman, aristos, hero, legend, god.

  • Becoming Gods

    I told everyone all along that if you understand Propertarianism, that like Copernicus’ universe, like Darwin’s evolution, and like artificial intelligence’s forthcoming consciousness, that knowledge is liberating and empowering but dehumanizing. Maturity comes at the cost of the comforts of ignorance and innocence. Awareness that you have superceded your fairy tales, superceded your impulses, superceded your parents, superseded, conventions, superseded legislation and regulation, superseded competitors, and superseded all but a few of mankind. Each step in the development of agency takes us farther toward calculation and farther away from the retreat into the animal brain of impulse instead of reason and submission to the pack instinct instead of rule. The universe is not kind. That is why it needs gods. And gods we can, must, and shall be. Although it is likely that not all of us can make the journey. For those that can, welcome to the post-human – to the language and thought of gods: one continuous set of relations from the fabric of the actionable universe to every potential transformation of it. Return to Paternal, Eugenic, Evolutionary Rule as our primary occupation. The incremental, intergenerational, production of gods. Man, warrior, craftsman, husband, father, judge, headman, aristos, hero, legend, god.

  • BECOMING GODS I told everyone all along that if you understand Propertarianism,

    BECOMING GODS

    I told everyone all along that if you understand Propertarianism, that like Copernicus’ universe, like Darwin’s evolution, and like artificial intelligence’s forthcoming consciousness, that knowledge is liberating and empowering but dehumanizing.

    Maturity comes at the cost of the comforts of ignorance and innocence. Awareness that you have superceded your fairy tales, superceded your impulses, superceded your parents, superseded, conventions, superseded legislation and regulation, superseded competitors, and superseded all but a few of mankind. Each step in the development of agency takes us farther toward calculation and farther away from the retreat into the animal brain of impulse instead of reason and submission to the pack instinct instead of rule.

    The universe is not kind. That is why it needs gods. And gods we can, must, and shall be. Although it is likely that not all of us can make the journey. For those that can, welcome to the post-human – to the language and thought of gods: one continuous set of relations from the fabric of the actionable universe to every potential transformation of it.

    Return to Paternal, Eugenic, Evolutionary Rule as our primary occupation. The incremental, intergenerational, production of gods.

    Man, warrior, craftsman, husband, father, judge, headman, aristos, hero, legend, god.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 10:22:00 UTC

  • (humor) —“Incremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the

    (humor) —“Incremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the construction of a method of fully accountable exchange incorporating property in toto with the goal of returning society to a eugenic model built upon sovereignty, commons, hierarchy and markets in everything.”— Alastair Buckwheat

  • (humor) —“Incremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the

    (humor) —“Incremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the construction of a method of fully accountable exchange incorporating property in toto with the goal of returning society to a eugenic model built upon sovereignty, commons, hierarchy and markets in everything.”— Alastair Buckwheat
  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24879952_10155938128002264_49028623

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24879952_10155938128002264_49028623

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24879952_10155938128002264_490286236444785928_o_10155938128002264.jpg (humor)

    —“Incremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the construction of a method of fully accountable exchange incorporating property in toto with the goal of returning society to a eugenic model built upon sovereignty, commons, hierarchy and markets in everything.”— Alastair BuckwheatJoel Davishttps://youtu.be/bG5wSvi7euIDec 05, 2017 11:40pmMatt RickhussA system in which the morally healthy are praised and the morally unhealthy are condemned.Dec 05, 2017 11:41pmNick HeywoodNo! I don’t have to and ya can’t make me! =DDec 05, 2017 11:59pmNick HeywoodWould ya look at Doolittle? FFS! LOL =D =D =D

    F’n love him but he’s mad!Dec 05, 2017 11:59pmShawn KinneyThe Abrahamic model.Dec 06, 2017 12:01amJon JonathanI’m not saying none of the Holocaust ever happened, all I’m saying is there is no credible evidence that it was wrong.Dec 06, 2017 12:17amNick HeywoodGotta be careful bringin’ up “The Holocaust” 😉

    Some’o’the maths doesn’t stack up. Just sayin’Dec 06, 2017 12:20amRichard Jacobson”Exterminate all the Whigs!”Dec 06, 2017 12:26amAlastair BuckwheatIncremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the construction of a method of fully accountable exchange incorporating property in toto with the goal of returning society to a eugenic model built upon sovereignity, commons, hierarchy and markets in everything.Dec 06, 2017 1:01amCurt Doolittleomfg you are good…. damn.Dec 06, 2017 1:19amRob McMullanAwesomeDec 06, 2017 7:33amBjorn Moritzhttps://youtu.be/DhslEgn_8SMDec 06, 2017 8:07amCurt Doolittleawesome.Dec 06, 2017 9:27amBjorn MoritzDid you ever watch the series, Spartacus: Blood and Sand? It was brilliant!Dec 06, 2017 9:29amCurt Doolittle@[687166933:2048:Bjorn Moritz] yes, loved it. rome, spartacus, vikings, tudors…. love it all.Dec 06, 2017 10:23amCurt DoolittleThere is a reason you can’t make a drama about the spartans.

    THEY DIDN”T HAVE ANY.Dec 06, 2017 10:23amWilliam L. BengeSomebody’s been paying attention, I’d venture to say. paha

    Man what a beauty of a statement. Just wowDec 06, 2017 11:38amWilliam L. Benge(mesmerized)Dec 06, 2017 11:39amCurt Doolittledamn he’s good, realllyDec 06, 2017 11:47amPeter TruscinskiNapDec 06, 2017 12:28pmCurt Doolittlenope to nap. non imposition against born costs of any kind, leaving only voluntary reciprocity (productive agrarianism), is very different from non aggression against intersubjectively verifiable property (parasitic pastoralism).Dec 06, 2017 12:31pmPeter Truscinski@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] Nap as in 😴Dec 06, 2017 12:59pmPeter TruscinskiNot NAPDec 06, 2017 12:59pmPeter TruscinskiMonarchy tho 🤔👌Dec 06, 2017 1:00pmPeter TruscinskiRepublicanism 🎉Dec 06, 2017 1:00pmBjorn MoritzI think I’d enjoy it anyway. Just them slave driving some Helots, massacring opposing armies and burning down some sacred groves 😍Dec 06, 2017 1:01pmCurt Doolittlesorry peter. just stayin’ on message. lolDec 06, 2017 1:02pmPeter TruscinskiLmaoDec 06, 2017 1:03pmPeter TruscinskiIt’s all goodDec 06, 2017 1:03pmPeter TruscinskiI understand your posits thoughDec 06, 2017 1:03pmAlastair Buckwheat^ Haha now I’m embarrassed, I’m only reiterating your hard work. Finish that book so we can really start to proselytise ;)Dec 07, 2017 10:24amMichael AndradeWe must secure the existence of our tendies and a future for NEET children.Dec 08, 2017 11:14am(humor)

    —“Incremental suppression of lying, aggression, parasitism through the construction of a method of fully accountable exchange incorporating property in toto with the goal of returning society to a eugenic model built upon sovereignty, commons, hierarchy and markets in everything.”— Alastair Buckwheat

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 23:38:00 UTC