Limited liability is an extension of the function of insurer of last resort to investments, so that individuals can take risks limited to the invested capital unless they engage in fraud. The problem with corporations is that the state has usurped our ability to sue them for impositions of costs on the various commons. This is a simple fix to rule of law.
Theme: Property
-
LIMITED LIABILITY IS FINE. IT”S LOSS OF STANDING IN THE COMMONS THAT IS THE PROB
LIMITED LIABILITY IS FINE. IT”S LOSS OF STANDING IN THE COMMONS THAT IS THE PROBLEM
Limited liability is an extension of the function of insurer of last resort to investments, so that individuals can take risks limited to the invested capital unless they engage in fraud. The problem with corporations is that the state has usurped our ability to sue them for impositions of costs on the various commons. This is a simple fix to rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:27:00 UTC
-
Individualism Is a “weasel Word”
Sovereignty can be tested by violations of interests that we categorically refer to as Property in Toto. A man is sovereign or he is not. He can demonstrate reciprocity in sovereignty or the cannot. Individualism, like non aggression, is just a weasel word for not defining the scope of interests against which one cannot impose costs, and the institutional means by which such a condition is created and preserved, against competition from those with different intentions. Sovereignty is an empirically testable definition. Individualism is just a means of weaseling out of a testable definition and thereby preserving means of deception.
-
Individualism Is a “weasel Word”
Sovereignty can be tested by violations of interests that we categorically refer to as Property in Toto. A man is sovereign or he is not. He can demonstrate reciprocity in sovereignty or the cannot. Individualism, like non aggression, is just a weasel word for not defining the scope of interests against which one cannot impose costs, and the institutional means by which such a condition is created and preserved, against competition from those with different intentions. Sovereignty is an empirically testable definition. Individualism is just a means of weaseling out of a testable definition and thereby preserving means of deception.
-
INDIVIDUALISM IS A “WEASEL WORD” Sovereignty can be tested by violations of inte
INDIVIDUALISM IS A “WEASEL WORD”
Sovereignty can be tested by violations of interests that we categorically refer to as Property in Toto. A man is sovereign or he is not. He can demonstrate reciprocity in sovereignty or the cannot.
Individualism, like non aggression, is just a weasel word for not defining the scope of interests against which one cannot impose costs, and the institutional means by which such a condition is created and preserved, against competition from those with different intentions.
Sovereignty is an empirically testable definition. Individualism is just a means of weaseling out of a testable definition and thereby preserving means of deception.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-14 09:34:00 UTC
-
by Bill Joslin I think the Propertarian legal frames can be explained simply. Bu
by Bill Joslin I think the Propertarian legal frames can be explained simply. But the difficulty in simplistic explanations pertains to constraining interpretation (free association) which dissolves our value on testimony as a demanding moral good. We can habituate that via law and grounded parables (parables grounded in reality)) (CURT: If you can disassemble that, it’s spot on.)
-
by Bill Joslin I think the Propertarian legal frames can be explained simply. Bu
by Bill Joslin I think the Propertarian legal frames can be explained simply. But the difficulty in simplistic explanations pertains to constraining interpretation (free association) which dissolves our value on testimony as a demanding moral good. We can habituate that via law and grounded parables (parables grounded in reality)) (CURT: If you can disassemble that, it’s spot on.)
-
Family is the Enemy of the State
—“Family is enemy number one of the State”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas People forget that the reason women have property rights was so that the church could break up the aristocratic families so that the church (state) could acquire their lands. By the French revolution, half of the land in europe was dead capital.
-
Family is the Enemy of the State
—“Family is enemy number one of the State”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas People forget that the reason women have property rights was so that the church could break up the aristocratic families so that the church (state) could acquire their lands. By the French revolution, half of the land in europe was dead capital.
-
Charities
I would prefer outlawing all charities that did not convey 100% of donations to the target. and I would demand warranty of that fact. This forces volunteers to produce goods through direct action and eliminates the profit incentive for virtue signaling.