(ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.) SOME RADICAL LEFTIST ASKED ME HOW PROPERTARIANISM WOULD JUDGE HITLER’S GERMANY’S RELOCATION POLICY It was a dishonest attempt to bait hate speech. I don’t do hate speech. Ever. I do Science and Natural Law. Here is the Answer: (a) That high trust is nearly exclusive to the germanic and Japanese peoples, and is their civilization’s competitive advantage. (b) That outside of scientific researchers (scientists) non kin shouldn’t cohabitate in the fist place, because it reduces trust, and creates those exact conditions of conflict. (The upper intellectual classes are more autistic and less dependent upon collective for information, and the lower classes the opposite). (c) That peoples that specialize in rent seeking and profiting from moral hazard in particular shouldn’t be hosted (any more than those dependent upon begging and thievery) because it leads to prosecution, persecution, and at times, extermination – as well as destroying trust and raising costs of policing the commons. (d) That peoples who practice separatism of any kind shouldn’t be tolerated by host societies for those same reasons. (e) That this process of separation, if pursued, should be legislated with a multi-year timeline, later prosecuted for non-compliance, and then subject to Hoppe’s “Forcible Removal”. (f) That the original relocation model, taken from the Soviet Relocations, had been successful there, and truthfully, throughout all human history. (g) That the combination of relocation (forcible removal) and a nearly impossible war was unmanageable. And that they could not fund both. Had they not been pressured by Russia into war, they would have succeeded.
Theme: Property
-
How Propertarianism Would Judge Hitler’s Germany’s Relocation Policy
(ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.) SOME RADICAL LEFTIST ASKED ME HOW PROPERTARIANISM WOULD JUDGE HITLER’S GERMANY’S RELOCATION POLICY It was a dishonest attempt to bait hate speech. I don’t do hate speech. Ever. I do Science and Natural Law. Here is the Answer: (a) That high trust is nearly exclusive to the germanic and Japanese peoples, and is their civilization’s competitive advantage. (b) That outside of scientific researchers (scientists) non kin shouldn’t cohabitate in the fist place, because it reduces trust, and creates those exact conditions of conflict. (The upper intellectual classes are more autistic and less dependent upon collective for information, and the lower classes the opposite). (c) That peoples that specialize in rent seeking and profiting from moral hazard in particular shouldn’t be hosted (any more than those dependent upon begging and thievery) because it leads to prosecution, persecution, and at times, extermination – as well as destroying trust and raising costs of policing the commons. (d) That peoples who practice separatism of any kind shouldn’t be tolerated by host societies for those same reasons. (e) That this process of separation, if pursued, should be legislated with a multi-year timeline, later prosecuted for non-compliance, and then subject to Hoppe’s “Forcible Removal”. (f) That the original relocation model, taken from the Soviet Relocations, had been successful there, and truthfully, throughout all human history. (g) That the combination of relocation (forcible removal) and a nearly impossible war was unmanageable. And that they could not fund both. Had they not been pressured by Russia into war, they would have succeeded.
-
He who can destroy a thing, owns a thing- all else is permission
Why do you deserve to share this world with us? He who can destroy a thing, owns a thing- all else is permission. The first question of politics is why I and mine (if we can) do not kill you and yours and take your stuff. The only answer is that it is more beneficial to cooperate. Until it is no longer more beneficial to cooperate.
-
He who can destroy a thing, owns a thing- all else is permission
Why do you deserve to share this world with us? He who can destroy a thing, owns a thing- all else is permission. The first question of politics is why I and mine (if we can) do not kill you and yours and take your stuff. The only answer is that it is more beneficial to cooperate. Until it is no longer more beneficial to cooperate.
-
NEWBIES. (Intro Help) OK, so, Propertarianism is a name we are sort of stuck wit
https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/29/propertarianism-core-concepts-by-eli-harman/https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/29/propertarianism-core-concepts-by-eli-harman/FOR NEWBIES. (Intro Help)
OK, so, Propertarianism is a name we are sort of stuck with simply because of the degree of awareness.
Operationally, it consists of:
1) The explanation of the reason for western rapidity of adaptation and evolution in the ancient and modern worlds. And the conflict of civilizations between the Masculine/True/Eugenic(Aristocratic/European), and Feminine/False/Dysgenic(Theological/Semitic), And how we are currently in the third generation (iteration) of that conflict.
2) Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Reciprocity and Testimony. This is the technical part of the work. And the description of “perfect government” (little different from antiquity).
3) A collections of essays that attempt to reframe literally every question and discipline when expressed truthfully. And a collection of essays answering literally all political social and ethical questions we have yet inventoried.
4) A constitution that is strictly constructed natural law including options for soft, medium, and hard implementations – including restitutions for damages caused by the left.
There is more but that’s the major components of the work.
If you ‘ask around’ it takes about six months to get your arms around it. And one to two years to use it well depending upon your ability and prior knowledge.
So because of the scope and detail of this work I write a lot of ‘sketches’ that you eventually see how fit together into a very tight puzzle.
Cheers
1 – Eli’s Introduction for Libertarians
https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/29/propertarianism-core-concepts-by-eli-harman/
2 – Curt’s Basic Concepts
https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/
3 – Curt’s Overview
https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/
4 – Course Outline
https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 12:48:00 UTC
-
NEWBIES. (Intro Help) OK, so, Propertarianism is a name we are sort of stuck wit
https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/29/propertarianism-core-concepts-by-eli-harman/FOR NEWBIES. (Intro Help)
OK, so, Propertarianism is a name we are sort of stuck with simply because of the degree of awareness.
Operationally, it consists of:
1) The explanation of the reason for western rapidity of adaptation and evolution in the ancient and modern worlds. And the conflict of civilizations between the Masculine/True/Eugenic(Aristocratic/European), and Feminine/False/Dysgenic(Theological/Semitic), And how we are currently in the third generation (iteration) of that conflict.
2) Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Reciprocity and Testimony. This is the technical part of the work. And the description of “perfect government” (little different from antiquity).
3) A collections of essays that attempt to reframe literally every question and discipline when expressed truthfully. And a collection of essays answering literally all political social and ethical questions we have yet inventoried.
4) A constitution that is strictly constructed natural law including options for soft, medium, and hard implementations – including restitutions for damages caused by the left.
There is more but that’s the major components of the work.
If you ‘ask around’ it takes about six months to get your arms around it. And one to two years to use it well depending upon your ability and prior knowledge.
So because of the scope and detail of this work I write a lot of ‘sketches’ that you eventually see how fit together into a very tight puzzle.
Cheers
1 – Eli’s Introduction for Libertarians
https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/29/propertarianism-core-concepts-by-eli-harman/
2 – Curt’s Basic Concepts
https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/
3 – Curt’s Overview
https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/
4 – Course Outline
https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 12:48:00 UTC
-
THE PROBLEM WITH THE GOLD STANDARD (LUDDISM) The problem with gold is (a) there
THE PROBLEM WITH THE GOLD STANDARD (LUDDISM)
The problem with gold is (a) there is too little of it, (b) and as such it is too volitile for long term pricing. (c) and it is too open to manipulation.
The problem with the fiat money system is only (a) we don’t have enough types of money, (b) we pay interest on borrowing from ourselves to create long term capital (housing, cars, appliances), which makes no damned sense at all, (c) we distribute liquidity through the financial sector and credit rather than just directly to consumers (citizens), and therefore cause the entire economy to reorganize and suffer the shocks, rather than simply having consumers correct the shock by shifting of consumption and debt.
Libertarians are pretty much always wrong, because they’re always only half right, and they’re half right not because they’re moral, but because they want to enable private sector rents rather than public sector rents, instead of eliminating rents altogether.
No man has any right to appreciation of a currency at the expense of others’ reduction of consumption or production. There is just no way to claim that. But it’s exactly the purpose of (((libertarian))) dogma: restoration of “the rents of the pale.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 10:25:00 UTC
-
The Market Is a Consequence of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, and The Independent Judiciary Common of The Common (tort) Law.
We create a market by creating sovereignty. we expand the market by incremental suppression of impositions of costs upon the investments made by others. We create private, corporate, and common assets. And we suppress impositions against them. The central problem of sovereignty is reduction of the lower classes that cannot survive in the CURRENT market order. In other words, we must genetically improve our distributions as we improve our productivity.
-
The Market Is a Consequence of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, and The Independent Judiciary Common of The Common (tort) Law.
We create a market by creating sovereignty. we expand the market by incremental suppression of impositions of costs upon the investments made by others. We create private, corporate, and common assets. And we suppress impositions against them. The central problem of sovereignty is reduction of the lower classes that cannot survive in the CURRENT market order. In other words, we must genetically improve our distributions as we improve our productivity.
-
Limited Liability Is Fine. It”s Loss of Standing in The Commons that Is the Problem
Limited liability is an extension of the function of insurer of last resort to investments, so that individuals can take risks limited to the invested capital unless they engage in fraud. The problem with corporations is that the state has usurped our ability to sue them for impositions of costs on the various commons. This is a simple fix to rule of law.