Theme: Property

  • (worth repeating) Pinker’s work misses (or artfully avoids the fact) that while

    (worth repeating)

    Pinker’s work misses (or artfully avoids the fact) that while violence has seemingly decreased, it has simply moved from physical attack on physical property to… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=298138574116373&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 17:39:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045367280954200069

  • exactly. same reason the church granted property rights to women: to destroy the

    exactly. same reason the church granted property rights to women: to destroy the great families.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 14:09:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045314535324876800

    Reply addressees: @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045006530083508225


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Outsideness

    To obstruct the heritability of wealth (though inheritance taxes) is to disconnect economics from genetics. Whose bizarre agenda does that serve?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045006530083508225

  • (worth repeating) Pinker’s work misses (or artfully avoids the fact) that while

    (worth repeating)

    Pinker’s work misses (or artfully avoids the fact) that while violence has seemingly decreased, it has simply moved from physical attack on physical property to financialization and political parasitism that has redistributed middle and working class reproduction familial insurance, and retirement to the underclass and immigrants, and destroyed the nuclear family central to the USA’s groups strategy by malincentives in the name of virtues.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 13:39:00 UTC

  • MALE RECIPROCITY VS FEMALE PROPORTIONALITY The SIX foundations by Gender Bias (M

    MALE RECIPROCITY VS FEMALE PROPORTIONALITY
    The SIX foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F)

    PRIVATE PROPERTY – FEMALE
    1) Fairness (Reciprocity) vs Proportionality(Equality): rendering justice… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=298029987460565&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 11:23:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045272636182482945

  • MOVEMENT IS GAINING MOMENTUM

    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4621647-Albuquerque-Forfeiture-Suit.htmlREFORM MOVEMENT IS GAINING MOMENTUM

    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4621647-Albuquerque-Forfeiture-Suit.html


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-19 10:00:00 UTC

  • September 19th, 2018 10:00 AM REFORM MOVEMENT IS GAINING MOMENTUM

    September 19th, 2018 10:00 AM REFORM MOVEMENT IS GAINING MOMENTUM
    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4621647-Albuquerque-Forfeiture-Suit.html

  • Ownership of Our Lines

    [W]e no longer own our children. If we owned our children still, we could influence their marriages. If we owned our government still, we could end alien immigration. We own neither and therefore no longer own self-determination of our line or our kin. As such you ask me to do what I cannot in the circumstance, and I ask you to do what we can do in the circumstance: fight to return our ownership – to create an alternative circumstance. The question is, will you fight? If you will not fight then your words are those of a woman: the ridicule of scolds is evidence of their powerlessness and lack of agency. And you are of no matter other than to be punished for your scolding.

  • Ownership of Our Lines

    [W]e no longer own our children. If we owned our children still, we could influence their marriages. If we owned our government still, we could end alien immigration. We own neither and therefore no longer own self-determination of our line or our kin. As such you ask me to do what I cannot in the circumstance, and I ask you to do what we can do in the circumstance: fight to return our ownership – to create an alternative circumstance. The question is, will you fight? If you will not fight then your words are those of a woman: the ridicule of scolds is evidence of their powerlessness and lack of agency. And you are of no matter other than to be punished for your scolding.

  • OWNERSHIP OF OUR LINES We no longer own our children. If we owned our children s

    OWNERSHIP OF OUR LINES

    We no longer own our children. If we owned our children still, we could influence their marriages. If we owned our government still, we could end alien immigration. We own neither and therefore no longer own self-determination of our line or our kin. As such you ask me to do what I cannot in the circumstance, and I ask you to do what we can do in the circumstance: fight to return our ownership – to create an alternative circumstance. The question is, will you fight? If you will not fight then your words are those of a woman: the ridicule of scolds is evidence of their powerlessness and lack of agency. And you are of no matter other than to be punished for your scolding.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-16 10:52:00 UTC

  • September 16th, 2018 11:13 AM —“Are you in favor of arranged marriages? I am,

    September 16th, 2018 11:13 AM

    —“Are you in favor of arranged marriages? I am, but I would love to hear your take”— Erik Lukovsky

    [N]o, because I am not in favor of selling children into slavery for money which is what occurs all too often. What I prefer is veto of proposal on grounds of insufficient demonstration of compatibility and merit to produce a home, income, and support of children for those under a certain age. I am also in favor of parental monetary contribution to setting up a household and the near elimination of the marriage ‘celebration’ entirely, which has become an absurd debt with which to start a family. via-negativa in all things. There are too many malincentives at present: delayed childhood and its suppression of socialization and mating rituals. Delayed childhood and it’s suppression of work experience in the service of others, and work experience in the generation of trades. The deprivation of the young from income from labor such that they accumulate demand for consumption during the period where they wish to do the most exploration and signaling and mating rituals. The issue of credit to the young who then indebt themselves. the issue of debilitating student loans to the young who then further indebt themselves, the combination of which is to spend the most fertile years at play rather than familial production. The issue of housing interest such that it is almost impossible to pay for a home within the first generation of children, thereby freeing the parents to assist the next generation and save for retirement once the children are grown. The issue of high taxation such that two incomes are necessary for the production of a household, rather than a second income for the purpose of extra entertainment and socialization. Other people’s engagement is the optimum consumer good. The problem is sortition such that we can engage peers, and separate from inhibitors to our socialization.