—“I’m almost silent on political matters since becoming a Propertarian – I’m embarrassed about libertarianism and objectivist fervour in the past and cannot speak unless I’ve done due diligence.”—Gary Knight
—“I’m almost silent on political matters since becoming a Propertarian – I’m embarrassed about libertarianism and objectivist fervour in the past and cannot speak unless I’ve done due diligence.”—Gary Knight
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53004989_10157013266502264_8578855676615327744_n_10157013266492264.jpg THE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?”
Answering this ‘fringe’ stuff simply demonstrates the power of propertarian analysis. 😉 And it’s funny….. lol
—“Curt Doolittle can pu–y be property?”—Kyle Brawn
You know, under the right conditions, I would answer that question sarcastically and get hammered for it. But at the moment I have my wits about me, and I will say that:
Empirically, for almost all of history, it has been property. I am not sure it still isn’t. It’s just collective rather than private ownership.
Empirically, Given The Possible Series:
1. Possession in fact (under your control – self defense )
3. Institutional Property (property rights – institutional defense)
It is possible to have ‘it’ under your control, normatively under your control, and institutional under your control.
Having ‘it’ just requires your ability to protect your control by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means.
In general it’s pretty difficult without (a) a slave population, and (b) institutional means of defending it.
Given that ‘it’ is not capable of self defense, ‘it’ doesn’t have an opinion. It is instead, the men who are willing to insure or prevent ‘ownership’ by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means that determine the outcome.
In general the outcome depends upon (a) the affordability of surplus native females willingness of native brothers and fathers to tolerate or (b) the affordability of surplus alien females and the ability of native females to rally their protecting males to prohibit the discount of their female market value by alien females.
The future has a very good chance of restoring slavery as far as I can tell, and the recent period of luxury produced by the western advances in technology may be a temporary rather than permanent progression.
That is, I think, the argument.
Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.
In other words Might Makes Rights – whether right or wrong.
Always and everywhere.
“Veritas Et Violentia”James Dmitro Makienko”Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.”
This just describes muslim/middle east christian women in Canada vs white atheist chicks. When women here were declared “persons” 100 years ago t was originally OK as the existing institutional and reciprocal means from the existing christian (50/50 catholic/ trad protestant) culture worked fine until the 60s when sexual revolutions destroyed it. The value of a patriarchal religion is in getting the women to not spread their legs and forces their emotional nature to follow men and not screw things up in the society.Feb 25, 2019, 11:51 PMCurt Doolittledoesn’t need to be religion, just law, but yes.
Religion is just shitty law, and bad education.Feb 26, 2019, 12:13 AMJames Dmitro MakienkoCurt Doolittle For women religion has some utility. Religion prevents neurotypical (non-autistic) women’s emotions from causing harm by channeling them into healthy sustainable pro-social behavior that. Emotions is what women need to care for infants. If a woman is autistic they are generally bad at caring for infants (just ask my wife), but they have a foot in both rational and emotional worlds. My wife describes it as being a man on the inside but looks like a woman on the outside. She says that non-autistic women are attracted to things like sparkles (she sells jewelry to them), art, beautiful singing etc – just like what can find in a traditional church or a mosque – as well as the community around it. They are moved by the chanting and repetition.The religion prevents women from using GSRRM on society by creating the monopoly of use of GSRRM on women – using gossip (religious myths), shaming (for emotional destructive behavior), rallying (church service), ridicule (thot patrol), moralizing (here is a moral code for you to follow). This monopoly enables men in congregation/society/polity to be in charge of politics/discourse/agency. It enables men to fight and win while keeping women faithful and not spreading legs to an army of invaders from other countries. By removing religion as a tool of redirecting GSRRM in women both politics/economics in today’s west focus on marketing to women.Feb 26, 2019, 12:37 AMCurt DoolittleJames Dmitro Makienko correctFeb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMCurt Doolittlewell done.Feb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMCurt DoolittleIf I get a chance I’ll edit and quote. too late my time. -sleeping.Feb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMJB BurnsIf you are a Chad they will tell you you own it😂Feb 26, 2019, 11:06 AMJoshua NielsenFeb 26, 2019, 8:16 PMPaul OliverI’m pleasantly surprised you’re not getting fb jailed anymore, you must have caught the rats in your friends listMar 1, 2019, 5:26 AMTHE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?”
Answering this ‘fringe’ stuff simply demonstrates the power of propertarian analysis. 😉 And it’s funny….. lol
—“Curt Doolittle can pu–y be property?”—Kyle Brawn
You know, under the right conditions, I would answer that question sarcastically and get hammered for it. But at the moment I have my wits about me, and I will say that:
Empirically, for almost all of history, it has been property. I am not sure it still isn’t. It’s just collective rather than private ownership.
Empirically, Given The Possible Series:
1. Possession in fact (under your control – self defense )
3. Institutional Property (property rights – institutional defense)
It is possible to have ‘it’ under your control, normatively under your control, and institutional under your control.
Having ‘it’ just requires your ability to protect your control by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means.
In general it’s pretty difficult without (a) a slave population, and (b) institutional means of defending it.
Given that ‘it’ is not capable of self defense, ‘it’ doesn’t have an opinion. It is instead, the men who are willing to insure or prevent ‘ownership’ by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means that determine the outcome.
In general the outcome depends upon (a) the affordability of surplus native females willingness of native brothers and fathers to tolerate or (b) the affordability of surplus alien females and the ability of native females to rally their protecting males to prohibit the discount of their female market value by alien females.
The future has a very good chance of restoring slavery as far as I can tell, and the recent period of luxury produced by the western advances in technology may be a temporary rather than permanent progression.
That is, I think, the argument.
Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.
In other words Might Makes Rights – whether right or wrong.
—“Can you define the essence of Propertarianism? There’s a saying “I have found the essence of Bushido – To die” Is there something similar in regard to Propertarianism?
So for example: sovereignty and reciprocity?”—
lol… what does ‘essence’ mean?
Propertarianism isn’t ONE thing.
It’s a collection of things.
But let’s use poetic license:
The essence of P-metaphysics is the grammars.
The essence of P-psychology of acquisitionism – all human psychology can be explained as acquisition.
The essence of p-epistemology of testimonialism is the completion of the method.
The essence of p-sociology of compatibilism is the division of perceptual, cognitive, memory, advocacy, negotiation, and labor with cooperation as a test of comparison.
The essence of p-ethics (propertarian ethics) is reciprocity as the test of comparison and property as the system of measurement.
The essence of p-politics (the natural law) is strict construction using all of the above.
The essence of the western group evolutionary strategy is the uniqueness of aristocratic egalitarianism: heroism and excellence, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth before face, and duty before self and family, Rule of law and the Jury, and markets in all aspects of life.
So the essence of propertarianism (the set of all ideas) is that this set of ideas that unifies all disciplines of human thought into a single commensurable system that is contiguous with physical science.
So if you had me make an analogy to the essence of bushido, it’s “The essence of the uniqueness of western civilization” written in logical and scientific terms.
I mean, you guys can ask me to simplify it all ya want but it’s not simple. It’s A LOT OF STUFF
Pairing off was driven by reduction of violence. Length of Pairing off was driven by neoteny. Marriage was driven by economic necessity (property). Universal marriage by farming. And the future is open for interpretation.
Pairing off was driven by reduction of violence. Length of Pairing off was driven by neoteny. Marriage was driven by economic necessity (property). Universal marriage by farming. And the future is open for interpretation.
Propertarianism is a system of law designed to prevent lying in politics.
…
…
WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Medium)
Propertarianism is a methodology that completes the scientific method; the application of that method to the law; a set of amendments to restore rule of law; including the prevention of lying about commerce, finance, economics, law, and politics in public speech.
…
…
WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Long)
Propertarianism refers to a body of work. That body of work consists of:
… 1. HISTORY: An explanation for the disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient and modern worlds.
… 2. METHOD: The completion of the scientific method and and its embodiment in law.
… 3. APPLICATION: Application of that method to all fields and common moral and legal questions.
… 4. LAW: A formal, algorithmic, operational, logic of law.
… 5. CONSTITUTION: A set of Recommended Amendments to the Constitution for the United States – preserving the current legal entity, while altering the current means of government.
… 6. POLICIES: a set of policies to reform our military, political, economic, financial, and social orders.
… 7. RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation that insurrection be used to demand implementation of these amendments to the constitution, given the scale of the parasitic classes in and out of government.
SUPREME COURT, 9 TO 0, BANS POLICE FROM ASSET FORFEITURE.
But up to 1/3 of police funding is from seizing assets.
It doesn’t go far enough. It prohibits the egregious violations of the past. But it needs to prohibit it entirely. Either pay from the general fund or forget it.
With police departments funded from seizures, fines, and tickets we have nothing but licensed corruption by organizations rather than individuals.
I prefer the shakedowns I got in ukraine and russia thanks.
(Not going to repeat every single refutation here. If you encounter one where you think you ‘got me’ it won’t happen. sorry. Just ask how we handle it.)
;
DEMAND FOR POSSESSION, PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS.
1) Cooperation provides disproportionate returns necessary for survival
2) Division of labor multiplies disproportionate returns on cooperation.
4) Humans engage in both retaliation, and altruistic (costly) punishment of cheaters in order to preserve the disproportionate returns on cooperation and cooperation at scale.
5) Morality consists of reciprocity within the local limits of proportionality. Man is amoral and acts in hist interests it is just nearly always in his better long term interests to act morally.
6) Law evolved to prevent retaliation cycles, to standardize means of conflict resolution, to maintain maximum returns for the majority of the polity, and to increase the revenues of taxing authorities.
7) Law uses a single measure: demonstrated investment which we call interests or ‘property’ to resolve conflicts and preserve the peace (returns on cooperation), and a single test: reciprocity. Ths law is called ‘tort’ or ‘natural law’.
8) Law evolves through the continuous evolutionary suppression of violations of reciprocity, through the continuous discovery of findings of law. It is a purely empirical process.
9) All social science can be expressed in terms of identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property.
10) All human cognition can be expressed as reward system responses to that same identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property.
THEREFORE;
Ergo PROPERTARIANISM consist of a universal language of linguistic, psychological, and social sciences that makes use of a standard of measure we commonly call property.
WHEREAS;
“Property” refers to:
1) MEASUREMENT: A category of measurements, within that category we call weights and measures, that provides commensurability and therefore decidability, over the use of all possible human interests, in matters of conflict over those interests, where those interests satisfy any demonstrated human demand.
AND WHERE;
Property consists in that series:
1) POSSESSION(IN FACT): That which I have acted to prevent others from consumption or use.
2) PROPERTY(NORMATIVE: That which you and I agree not to use or consume from one another.
3) PROPERTY RIGHTS(INSURED): that which a third party will insure we do not use or consume from one another.
AND WHERE;
Rights include no less than:
1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation.
… 5) Such action is free of violation of the same by externality. (unharmful)
AND WHERE;
Man demonstrates interest and defends the following categories of his means of production:
1) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF EXISTENCE
Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”
– Physical Body
– Actions and Time
– Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands.
– Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)
– Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over.
AND;
2) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF REPRODUCTION
Means of Reproduction: “relationships with others and tools of relationships upon which we reciprocally depend.”
– Mates (access to sex/reproduction)
– Children (genetic reproduction)
– Familial Relations (security)
– Consanguineous Relations (tribal and family ties)
– Racial property (racial ties)
– Status and Class (reputation)
AND;
3). MEANS OF PRIVATE PRODUCTION
Relational Property
– Non-Familial Relations (utility)
– Organizational ties (work)
Cooperative Property
– Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership)
Artificial Property
– Monopoly Property such as intellectual property. (grants of limited monopoly within a geography)
– Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography).
AND;
4). MEANS OF COMMONS PRODUCTION
(Community) Property
– Institutional Property: “Those objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”
– Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consists of forgone opportunities.
– Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. Formal institutional property is easy to price. costs are visible. And the productivity of the social order is at least marginally measurable.
