Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52565983_10156987229382264_662987130

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52565983_10156987229382264_662987130

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52565983_10156987229382264_6629871303773913088_n_10156987229377264.jpg by Eli Harman

    Canada’s gun laws aren’t terrible TBH. There are some more restrictive training and permitting requirements than in the states. But the nationwide registry was abolished in 2012 (Quebec has their own.) Some models are banned or restricted. But there are generally workalikes and lookalikes available. There are no transferrable full autos, but the import restrictions aren’t as strict. The real issue is just that there isn’t the same “gun culture” and people’s sense of popular sovereignty is totally invested in democratic processes and institutions (which are easy to corrupt and pervert) and not in the right to revolt, which is stigmatized more and celebrated less, compared to the breakaway colonies… (And the right of self-defense is weaker with basically no provisions for legally carrying or using firearms for that purpose.)Tyler SeguinYeah they REALLY don’t want you using firearms for self defense here.Feb 14, 2019, 7:21 PMVik LiBloody 5-round magazine capacity for rifles…Feb 14, 2019, 8:07 PMDaniel WrightSwitzerland has 45.7Feb 14, 2019, 8:11 PMKay MortonIf someone breaks into my home and threatens my family with their illegally obtained gun, it’s illegal for my husband to use his legalised gun to shoot them in self defense. However, he can knife them. … hmmmFeb 14, 2019, 8:17 PMBill JoslinThe history of Canadian guns laws is interesting (upto ’92)Feb 14, 2019, 9:15 PMPaul TrippMany parts of the world have been relatively free to disarm under the assumption that the American military, kept in check by American civilians, would come save them if their government became too corrupt and oppressive.

    They’re gonna learn some hard lessons when that ain’t the case anymore.Feb 14, 2019, 10:18 PMDavid McCarthyDespite all the guns in Yemen(I didn’t know there were that many) the people there are still being starved to death…Feb 14, 2019, 11:41 PMDave Germaniukyou get around that by having “pistol” mags.

    https://albertatacticalrifle.com/hikashop-menu-for-categories-listing/product/cid-8379Feb 15, 2019, 7:20 AMby Eli Harman

    Canada’s gun laws aren’t terrible TBH. There are some more restrictive training and permitting requirements than in the states. But the nationwide registry was abolished in 2012 (Quebec has their own.) Some models are banned or restricted. But there are generally workalikes and lookalikes available. There are no transferrable full autos, but the import restrictions aren’t as strict. The real issue is just that there isn’t the same “gun culture” and people’s sense of popular sovereignty is totally invested in democratic processes and institutions (which are easy to corrupt and pervert) and not in the right to revolt, which is stigmatized more and celebrated less, compared to the breakaway colonies… (And the right of self-defense is weaker with basically no provisions for legally carrying or using firearms for that purpose.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 17:52:00 UTC

  • “Your Conservatism changes to Propertarianism once your country is stolen from y

    “Your Conservatism changes to Propertarianism once your country is stolen from you by the use of lies.”
    –Serg Gio

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 14:56:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096060507390337029

  • LOOKS LIKE WE DISCOVERED A NEW PROPERTARIAN 😉 —“A very good article. A few th

    LOOKS LIKE WE DISCOVERED A NEW PROPERTARIAN 😉

    —“A very good article. A few things came to mind. The boy who cried wolf is an excellent exercise in type I and type II logic errors. The variation of the villagers conflating “wolf” with stray dogs reminded me of how overused the term “racist” is or “white supremacist”. They have no meaning.

    They at one time were used as a magic spell to whites to cough up money and resources. A real racist is not phased by the title and now, few that are accused of it are not as well – damage done.

    The worst of all is gaslighting because it works it’s way into the mind of the victim and they end up living in a perpetual stockholm syndrome – well, if done correctly. If not, it just drives a person mad.”—JWarren Prescott

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 13:59:00 UTC

  • “Your Conservatism changes to Propertarianism once your country is stolen from y

    “Your Conservatism changes to Propertarianism once your country is stolen from you by the use of lies.”

    –Serg Gio

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 09:55:00 UTC

  • WHAT ARE THE LEGIT CRITS OF PROP? (One More Time!!!) —“Curt: honest question:

    WHAT ARE THE LEGIT CRITS OF PROP? (One More Time!!!)

    —“Curt: honest question: What are the faults/weaknesses to propertarianism? I am a supporter but no human system is perfect and would like to know that you have thought out how to beat your own plan and what are the counters to slow or stop those from happening. Keep up the good work. Thanks if you respond.”—

    Um. I publish legit criticisms all the time. There are a few.

    They are all reducible to:

    1. Its big, complex, deep, and hard to learn. It is. The more I undrestand it myself, the more I understand that this scale of thing has only happened three other times in history. But people want something simple-stupid like libertarianism or progressivism. It’s not an ideology. it’s the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to all human thought, embodiment in the law, and means of restoring our civilization.

    2. People want a political ideology, religion, or secular religion (philosophy) and prop is simply science and law, with ADVICE on religion and secular religion.

    3. Jewish, christian, islamic religion do not come off very well, and I have not found a way to accommodate christian mysticism.

    4. Everyone wants a monopoly (religion, authoritarianism, fascism, anarchism) when we must use each of these components in every society – we cannot have a monopoly on any of them. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred way of organizing society – i use all of them.

    5. I suggest a few methods of governing across various peoples and various conditions with the law being the only constant. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred order. I use what is required.

    6. I am an unabashed elitist working in favor of my people, but other than knowing what is good for my people, I do not consider their understanding of the world very valuable. Only the set of demands they have, not their way of satisfying them. ( I do not claim to be a good, a moral, or decent person or anything of the sort, I only claim I am correct. God knows I’ve made the same mistakes everyone else has. )

    As far as I know there are no extant criticisms of the work itself and it will be extremely unlikely such things will arise other than in nuances. This is revolutionary and once you understand it your life will be changed forever.

    THE COMMON LEGIT CRITS

    … are listed in Section 3 Here:

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156982914672264

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 09:54:00 UTC

  • “One time I asked Curt Doolittle “What is stopping me from killing you, taking y

    —“One time I asked Curt Doolittle “What is stopping me from killing you, taking your things, and r*p*ing your women?”. He told me that if I wanted to do those things than he would join me and recruit more men to help and so on.”—- Lance Starin

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 20:52:00 UTC

  • “One does not become a Propertarian. One only discovers, sooner or later, that o

    —-“One does not become a Propertarian. One only discovers, sooner or later, that one has always been one — that, by nature, one could not possibly be anything else.” —Savitri Devi (edited posthumously by Matt Lawlor)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 11:55:00 UTC

  • You tagged Matt Lawlor photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51852501_1015

    You tagged Matt Lawlor photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51852501_1015

    You tagged Matt Lawlor photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51852501_10156981793197264_1582782795325898752_o_10156981793187264.jpg YOU WILL END UP AT PROPERTARIANISM. YOU WILL. SORRY. (But take your time. We can’t handle too many of you at once.)Emily WalshHow do I read Siege without being put on a listFeb 12, 2019, 12:50 PMCurt Doolittledownload it from our library. ;)Feb 12, 2019, 12:51 PMCurt Doolittlehttps://mega.nz/#!uqwlgQaR!m-aIxx3rkzpQvRb1RwOPjCuoFBkfJPIoUg2RbAjMKnIFeb 12, 2019, 12:56 PMAustyn PemberCurt Doolittle what do you think of Siege and Mason?Feb 12, 2019, 1:06 PMCurt DoolittleUm, I think there are ways of reaching each demographic and narrative is one of the best means. I think visualizing howsuch things would roll out is good for removing doubt. I think everyone who works on internal security at all undrstands this strategy. And I think everyone knows it will work.Feb 12, 2019, 1:08 PMCurt DoolittleWhy: those who act first hoard the resources, and block transport, commnunication, and power. Between panic, hoarding, and interruption of commerce, the ‘nine meals before chaos’ is rather obvious.Feb 12, 2019, 1:09 PMRoss LampersMatt Lawlor ^

    From now on when people ask for a beginners intro to propertarianism the answer is READ SIEGEFeb 12, 2019, 1:42 PMRoss Lampershttps://youtu.be/OG4XAPEFGcoFeb 12, 2019, 1:44 PMDavid StephenEmily Walsh please dont take this wrong. Looking at your profile I would have never expected someone who “looked” like you to be interested in reading Siege. The fact you are brings me hope to our struggle.Feb 12, 2019, 2:20 PMHunter DuncanThe thought of a typical suburban mom reading siege is cracking me up. Holy shit that’s a white pillFeb 12, 2019, 2:30 PMCurt Doolittleyou know i fking love that clip…. lolFeb 12, 2019, 2:45 PMRoss LampersYou should it’s a good clipFeb 12, 2019, 5:18 PMDan PooleI echo the above sentiments. I’ve got my issues with “Seige,” but if suburban normies are reading it and actually like what that book is ultimitely trying to accomplish, then maybe there’s hope after all. I have YET to meet a normie White suburban family in real life that thinks like that, and believe me, it’s not for lack of tryingFeb 12, 2019, 6:50 PMCurt DoolittleProvide a solution, and leadership will emerge.

    If leadership emerges so will consensus.

    If Consensus emerges, so will action.

    If action emerges, then we will win.Feb 12, 2019, 6:51 PMCaduceus MercuriusI think SIEGE can be summed up as follows:

    Don’t do protest marches.

    Don’t think you can achieve anything with a political party.

    Don’t think voting will change anything that is of true importance.

    If you’re going to fight, don’t just throw rocks at cops and similar minor targets (including Antifa etc.), but plan your attacks carefully for maximum disruption of the system.Feb 13, 2019, 5:07 AMYOU WILL END UP AT PROPERTARIANISM. YOU WILL. SORRY. (But take your time. We can’t handle too many of you at once.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 12:41:00 UTC

  • Don’t have one. Market for prosecution of privatization of the commons or social

    Don’t have one. Market for prosecution of privatization of the commons or socialization of losses under the law solves the problem. Today we are disintermediated by the state in ‘standing’ before the court, in matters of the commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 01:53:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095138885267533825

    Reply addressees: @TheOldOrder1 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095122573443125248

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095122573443125248

  • A LEGIT CRITICISM THAT IS AN UNREASONABLE CRITICISM —“Instead of saying “prope

    A LEGIT CRITICISM THAT IS AN UNREASONABLE CRITICISM

    —“Instead of saying “propertarianism is a collection of ideas the most fundamental of which is… “ I wish she would just list the ideas in concise, fundamental forms of course including the new form of the scientific method. …. Historical reference is of course important for full understanding but you place more importance on how it fits in with respect to our existing modalities of thought and our history ….. If it’s a complete system you should be able to express it external to all context”— Bill Smith

    It’s like asking aristotle to list aristotelianism in concise format. He was applying legal (juridical) reasoning rather than the traditional normative, moral or supernatural, to the world of knowledge in his time. I’m doing the same with two millennia of additional information to work with – particularly economics, physics, cognitive and computer science – aristotle was working within human scale, and in our age, we can work beyond human scale both micro and macro. So, how do you distill that down more so than “Aristotle developed reason, began the discipline of empiricism, and science and applied his method to all fields of inquiry”. Well I did the same thing.

    Now if you want to see the outline of the set of ideas that came from that insight you can read it since it’s in summary form in the Overview. Or at least most of it is. And if you want to see it implemented you can see the state of the constitution (in continuous development). But it’s a LONG LIST of ideas, just as Aristotle in his era, or hobbes/locke/smith/hume in their era, or a list of a hundred thinkers in the industrial era.

    It’s not that I can’t say it clearly. I just did in the video. It’s that the “…application of the completion of the scientific method to all fields of inquiry…” exposes many ideas.

    So the “Overview” is (was really) my working list of the major ideas. (I do most of my work in the book now.)

    I say them concisely all the time. But that does not mean you will understand them without some rather serious effort, any more than you will undrestand any other technical field conveying counter-intuitive information without serious effort. I mean, how many people don’t understand darwin’s theory today, or einstein’s. once understood they are quite simple. If described they don’t convey much at all.

    Ideologies are simple. That’s their purpose.

    Revolutions in thought are not simple because they touch everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 12:36:00 UTC