Theme: Productivity

  • You are an envious, jealous, sick idiot. Do you have any idea what that man has

    You are an envious, jealous, sick idiot. Do you have any idea what that man has done for mankind? He’s created Trillions of wealth across billions of people by democratizing information technology previously reserved for the wealthy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 13:19:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192431347370999808

    Reply addressees: @existentialcoms

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192258954933370881


    IN REPLY TO:

    @existentialcoms

    Bill Gates, the supposed “good guy” billionaire not being sure if he would vote for Trump rather than have a 2% wealth tax or whatever is why billionaires cannot exist.

    No one should control that much power. They will fight to maintain their power, against democracy, every time.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192258954933370881

  • Do you think with 100b the government would do more for mankind that Bill gates?

    Do you think with 100b the government would do more for mankind that Bill gates? Do you know how LITTLE MONEY 100b is for the government? Do you have any conception of what that man has done for the world in creating tens of trillions of dollars of wealth for all of us? omg.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 13:17:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192430802447011840

    Reply addressees: @studentactivism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192237805554016256


    IN REPLY TO:

    @studentactivism

    You know how long it would take Warren’s wealth taxes to cost Bill Gates $100 billion, if he never gave another dollar away to charity? Forty-five years. You know how old Bill Gates will be in forty-five years? A hundred and nine. https://t.co/iMqESBFA5C

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192237805554016256

  • 1) He’s gay and British. 2) He’s marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating m

    1) He’s gay and British. 2) He’s marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating marx in quantitative redistributive innumeracy; 4) He did not understand the consequences to capital; 5) Nor how people would run with it; 6) Hayek did but he lacked the language (or didn’t use it).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 17:03:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192125302480277505

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192118660032278530


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192118660032278530

  • ROMAN WEEKS VS USA CURRENT, AND FUTURE WEEKS AFAIK: OPTIMUM CALENDAR: 13 * 4wk,

    ROMAN WEEKS VS USA CURRENT, AND FUTURE WEEKS

    AFAIK: OPTIMUM CALENDAR:

    13 * 4wk, 7day Months is pretty optimum in modernity.

    5 * 6hr work days wit 1hr break, are maximum human productivity… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=500354873894741&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 18:42:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191787871767842822

  • Parasites. Those who demand redistribution from the labors of others without hav

    Parasites. Those who demand redistribution from the labors of others without having earned them by production and trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 14:17:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191721226118545409

    Reply addressees: @TempletonViktor @YvesBurri @SamuelWhittemo4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191710965902925824


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191710965902925824

  • This “Fascism” prevents consumption of accumulated genetic, personal, shareheld,

    This “Fascism” prevents consumption of accumulated genetic, personal, shareheld, common, social, portable, fixed, territorial, and institutional capital advocated by immoral libertarians under free trade, open borders, and the sophism of non aggression w/o including ALL capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 13:50:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191714336844271616

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191713650509307905


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @StefanMolyneux One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, where the court and jury provide a market for punishment(court) in competition with the market for rewards(the market proper), & where exists a prohibition against imposition by arbitrage.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191713650509307905


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @StefanMolyneux One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, where the court and jury provide a market for punishment(court) in competition with the market for rewards(the market proper), & where exists a prohibition against imposition by arbitrage.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1191713650509307905

  • ROMAN WEEKS VS USA CURRENT, AND FUTURE WEEKS AND WHY? AFAIK: OPTIMUM CALENDAR: 1

    ROMAN WEEKS VS USA CURRENT, AND FUTURE WEEKS AND WHY?

    AFAIK: OPTIMUM CALENDAR:

    13 * 4wk, 7day Months is pretty optimum in modernity.

    5 * 6hr work days wit 1hr break, are maximum human productivity at current work rates (hard). Tohse of us who are elites will always work more – because we love to.

    4 * 6hr work days, and three days off reconstructs the family unit. Even if both parents work. This should be possible with automation and exit of the underclasses.

    End summer vacations for schools and universities, and increase vacations throughout the year for all.

    WHY IS THIS MISLEADING?

    because (a) indoctrination into the culture (which matters), (b) the necessity of ‘being open for business’ the maximum amount of hours, therefore seizing the maximum number of opportunities, is a competitive necessity unless not only the whole country does it (see Cyprus – which is an outlier) or the whole world does it (seven day weeks). Because ‘availability’ is in fact a competitive advantage.

    So the problem remains one of competing with others externally for opportunity via availability, competing with others internally for access to opportunity, experience and information, so that ‘not being there’ is a disadvantage over those who ‘are there’ – and there is nothing that can stop it whatsoever – except legislatively and therefore universally leveling the playing field. So if you want it, that’s the answer.

    So anyone’s job that is driven by opportunity (sales, executive), and private professionals who want to work will work whatever they want for as much as they want, and people who not opportunity but production oriented, such as managerial, administrative, clerical, craftsman, labor, and service will work regularly because frankly YOU ARE SUBSTITUTABLE. That’s why you will always make less income that NON-SUBSTITUTABLE pepole. And it’s why non-substitutable people make more money: because ten percent of the people do

    ROMAN CALENDAR

    The Romans did not recognize the week as a unit of time, so didn’t have weekends.

    The Romans had months, which they divided up by specially named days: Kalends(1st), Nones(~5th/7th), and Ides(~13th/15th). The time of these was probably originally based on phases of the moon.

    The Kalends was always the first day of the month.

    The Nones were eight days before the Ides, on either the 5th or 7th of the month.

    The Ides were thought to have originally coincided with the full moon, and fell on the 15th of months with 31 days, and otherwise on the 13th.

    These were not treated as holidays; they were purely for identifying days in the month. Instead of saying, “It’s Monday,” the Romans would say, “It’s sixteen days before the Kalends of September.” They always counted backwards, and inclusively.

    As for workdays vs holidays, the Romans celebrated many fixed holidays (feriae), as well as ones that were simply declared. Most were religious, at least in name, and were occasions when at least some people did not work.

    In some cases, games were held, often funded by the wealthy, perhaps with the goal of getting votes.

    There were nearly 180 of these held during a typical year, and though every worker did not take every one of these days off, there were many opportunities to have a day off here and there.

    Roman work days: 365days – 180days = 185days = ~15 Days a Month work, ~15 days off. (this isn’t likely). It’s more likely 20-22, with every day for hand to mouth people, who didn’t run a farm.

    Americans work ~21 days a month including holidays.

    One thing to remember: there were no laws limiting how many hours or days an employee could work, what they must be paid, or how many days off they must have. People who were not slaves lived hand to mouth, and probably could not take a lot of days off for economic reasons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 13:42:00 UTC

  • THE OTHER REASON FOR ACADEMIC REFORM: USE TECH TO SCALE THE BEST, AND EXIT THE R

    THE OTHER REASON FOR ACADEMIC REFORM: USE TECH TO SCALE THE BEST, AND EXIT THE REST.
    —“Most professors outside of the very top tier don’t break the 120 -130 range (not bright enough to move… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497562774173951&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 17:33:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190320859359174658

  • The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying

    The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 23:17:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190045044805427200

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190044445380694017


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders on Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190044445380694017


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders on Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190044445380694017

  • I SAID … DECLINING MARRIAGE INCENTIVES AND MALE WITHDRAWAL FROM THE LABOR FORC

    https://e9b0558e-7a7d-4b8e-a3c1-ed599eb209e5.filesusr.com/ugd/c393c3_be1795fad1bb47cdbf28bed27ee45ea6.pdfLIKE I SAID … DECLINING MARRIAGE INCENTIVES AND MALE WITHDRAWAL FROM THE LABOR FORCE

    —“Why have so many young men withdrawn from the U.S. labor force since 1965? This paper presents a model in which men invest time in employment to enhance their value as marriage partners.

    When the marriage market return on this investment declines, young men’s employment declines as well, in preparation for a less favorable marriage market.

    Taking this prediction to data, I show that fewer young men sought employment after TWO interventions that reduced the value of gender-role-specialization within marriage:

    i) the adoption of unilateral divorce legislation, and

    ii) demand-driven improvements in women’s employment opportunities.

    I then show, using a structural estimation, that half of the employment effect of a labor market shock to men’s wages is determined by endogenous adjustment of the marriage market to the shock.

    These findings establish the changing marriage market as an important driver of decline in young men’s labor market involvement.

    That is from the job market paper of Ariel J. Binder, job market candidate from the University of Michigan.

    https://e9b0558e-7a7d-4b8e-a3c1-ed599eb209e5.filesusr.com/ugd/c393c3_be1795fad1bb47cdbf28bed27ee45ea6.pdfUpdated Oct 31, 2019, 9:21 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 21:21:00 UTC