Curt Doolittle

Theme: Productivity

  • THE ONE IRRESOLVABLE PROBLEM: Dysgenic Consumption(Liberal), Eugenic Capitalizat

    THE ONE IRRESOLVABLE PROBLEM: Dysgenic Consumption(Liberal), Eugenic Capitalization (Conservative). A compromise is not possible by rational means. The only solution is to SEPARATE. The agrarian age is over. We can afford to return to speciation, and are. And that’s the conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 12:04:00 UTC

  • Economics – Production of Consumption

    THE ECONOMICS OF TIME AND MORALITY

    Free markets are a lie. Their existence has no scale on independent theories, and likewise, their existence has no scale on independent markets. They are another cosmopolitan invention. A moral pretense by which to engage in immoral actions. The requirement that we not impose costs by externality upon the investments of others causing the loss of capital in territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, normative, informational, familial, and genetic assets limits markets. Markets allow us to create opportunity through proximity, informational, informal and formal institutions, and physical infrastructure as a common good. Market opportunities are produced as a common good. We can then serve the common good by converting opportunity into exchanges, the performance of which, creates more than it consumes by the service of the coincidence of wants. We create opportunities for temporal compression through the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy, and seize them through the identification of a coincidence of wants, thereby converting the potential for temporal compression into the existential compression of time. And it is through this temporal compression that we, collectively, in increasing scales, constantly reduce the cost of existence, and defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity. If you understand this you will understand all of human civilization, and the reason we have achieved what no other creatures have achieved. We must defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, distance, and scarcity, and we do so through cooperation, and we cooperate through the incremental suppression of the imposition of costs on one another upon life, body, kin, possessions, and interests, in the form of violence, theft, fraud, falsehood, conspiracy, rents and free-riding. We accomplish this incremental suppression by the demand for a warranty of due diligence for our products(materials), services(actions), and information(speech) and the prosecution, restitution, punishment, ostracisation, or execution, of those who circumvent that Warranty of Reciprocity by production, action, or speech. This leaves us with no option but to participate in voluntary markets under which we limit our productions, actions, and speech to that which consists of productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of cost upon the life, kin, possessions, and interests of others by externality. This explains the entirety of human existence.

    The Need for New Institutions of Calculation

    (the problem of measurement) (the problem of pooling)  

    Ordinary people need elites, and elites need ordinary people

    Ordinary people need elites, and elites need ordinary people unless dis-intermediated by capital. So end disintermediation by capital and you restore the reciprocal dependence of elites upon ordinary people. So in order to prevent elites from defecting from their ordinary people the people must prevent disintermediation their from elites by capital. How is this done? Relatively easily. Especially with full accounting of changes in capital.  

    The Soviet Experiment

    (advantage of the discount on market prices of serf labor at cost of skills and incentives)  

    The Chinese Experiment

    Why No Version of Socialism Is Possible

    [ KEY LESSON: HUMANS SEEK RENTS over productivity. The only way to obtain those rents is indirectly through market gains. And of all the goods you can produce, a one child policy for the unproductive provides the highest returns. Why? Because people CAN act on DIRECT rent seeking, and people CANNOT act on indirect rent seeking (market returns). ] In other words, socialism is the ultimate selfishness. LIST

    1. The investments are undecidable without monetary interests (it’s impossible) so that in the absence of money and rule of law we see discretion.
    2. The investments are minimal because in all organizations, members seek to maximize rents.
    3. Because the incentive to maximize rents is superior to the incentive to invest, corruption evolves instead of production.
    4. Because of all of the above, the general standard of living of the people declines relative to those who practice markets.
    5. Because of the difference in standard of living force must be used to retain the population(defectors) OR force will (in the past at least) be used to prevent invasion by defectors.
    6. Socialists are simply seeking non-market rents. The way to obtain market premiums is to exit the company in favor of a company that pays more.
    7. If you cannot exit the company and obtain a premium, then you are already maximizing your income.
    8. Engineers (employees) that produce outsized returns provide those returns to the entire company, allowing increases in rents by all employees.
    9. Investors require high returns for the simple reason that the vast majority of their investments fail. The portfolio strategy is to lose most, make good returns on a few, and have one windfall. This is also how the movie business, and publishing business work, with outliers paying for all others. (this is why redistribution – exists under capitalism: unpredictability)
    10. Engineers with ideas that produce outsized returns leave the company to produce the product on their own. If they cannot produce it on their own then they means that the value was in the organization not the individual since the value is in organizing and creating investment, production, distribution, and trade.
    11. There have been rare cases where individuals are not compensated (windshield wiper delays) but the vast number of individuals who contribute returns venture on their own – and don’t otherwise, because they in fact cannot produce the product.
    12. As an aside, corporate democracy is absolutely ridiculous. All the evidence illustrates that leadership matters, and as someone who has built some very large consulting companies, specializing the creating consensus in companies, democracy in companies would be as catastrophic as it is in politics, and only lead to the same corruption. Someone DOES know the answer in the company. The primary function of Management Consulting Companies is to survey what everyone in a company knows, to identify which ideas have some potential given the available financial and market resources and then write an argument and develop consensus in the company because of it. Why? Dunning Kruger: everyone in a company (any organization, and in society) VASTLY overstates their knowledge except Generals, CEOs, and Presidents. Any competent CEO or general will say the same thing: I am only doing this job because I can’t find someone who will do it better, or I promised some people I would do it until I succeeded or failed. That’s it.

    I could go on but basically redistribution occurs through success of organizations. The problem is simply the one eugenicists warned us about, and economists acknowledge only behind closed doors: that the central problem for any polity is reducing the size of the unproductive classes to those who have been the victims of accidents, rather than increasing the size of dependent classes until their rents are maximized, and investment and risk are no longer possible on the one hand, and ability to absorb shocks is no longer possible on the other. HUMANS SEEK RENTS. The only way to obtain them is indirectly through market gains. And of all the goods you can produce, a one child policy for the unproductive provides the highest returns. Why? Because people CAN act on DIRECT rent seeking, and people CANNOT act on indirect rent seeking (market returns). This is why market economies succeed in vast improvement of lower class conditions more so than the upper classes (who are subject to constantly forced economic rotation. While the reason socialist economies always fail, and always will fail is attributed to a lack of incentives to produce, and because the creation of incentives for corruption, and because Very few companies last the lifetime of their founders and their children. And as capital is continually less important than rates of invention and innovation, this will continue. Wealth generally survives under three generations. And around 94% of wealth is generated by small and medium business entrepreneurship. And of that wealth a not insignificant portion is research and development that that is later acquired by larger companies with access to public markets. The only thing we can do today is eliminate consumer interest on consumption (houses, cars, appliances), and cut the size of the unproductive classes by eliminating immigration extending work life by providing ‘retirees’ and ‘students’ with part time work, eliminating the obesity problem that limits people’s ability to work, and by culling the underclasses through one child policy. Everything else is suicidal (Europe, Canada, and America), or destructive (brazil, india). PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT MIXED ECONOMIES The problem with current capitalism is that it is possible on the one hand to form unions that can extort from companies under collective bargaining (which is why companies left the USA), and on the other hand, it is possible for (a) investors to prey on companies at the expense of management and staff (this is easily fixed by prohibiting leveraged buyouts, and then legally limiting risk), and (b) we do not help companies adjust to shocks often enough (we should have helped hostess like we helped the auto companies), (c) we do not engage in enough private public ventures (like Tesla, which if successful directly or indirectly, will revolutionize transport by resetting the clock back 100 years), (d) we do not prohibit labor arbitrage (outsourcing production for the purpose of obtaining labor discounts), (e) and we conduct trade policy like everyone else, which is to attempt to restore technological leadership by ensuring that we are not behind (production of LED and other screens, and mass production of chips), (e) and eliminate corporate pensions (they are no longer possible) and centralize them (Singapore model), because they alter the pricing system such that products are decreasingly competitive. (and btw: eliminate government pensions as well.)  

  • Economics – Production of Consumption

    THE ECONOMICS OF TIME AND MORALITY

    Free markets are a lie. Their existence has no scale on independent theories, and likewise, their existence has no scale on independent markets. They are another cosmopolitan invention. A moral pretense by which to engage in immoral actions. The requirement that we not impose costs by externality upon the investments of others causing the loss of capital in territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, normative, informational, familial, and genetic assets limits markets. Markets allow us to create opportunity through proximity, informational, informal and formal institutions, and physical infrastructure as a common good. Market opportunities are produced as a common good. We can then serve the common good by converting opportunity into exchanges, the performance of which, creates more than it consumes by the service of the coincidence of wants. We create opportunities for temporal compression through the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy, and seize them through the identification of a coincidence of wants, thereby converting the potential for temporal compression into the existential compression of time. And it is through this temporal compression that we, collectively, in increasing scales, constantly reduce the cost of existence, and defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity. If you understand this you will understand all of human civilization, and the reason we have achieved what no other creatures have achieved. We must defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, distance, and scarcity, and we do so through cooperation, and we cooperate through the incremental suppression of the imposition of costs on one another upon life, body, kin, possessions, and interests, in the form of violence, theft, fraud, falsehood, conspiracy, rents and free-riding. We accomplish this incremental suppression by the demand for a warranty of due diligence for our products(materials), services(actions), and information(speech) and the prosecution, restitution, punishment, ostracisation, or execution, of those who circumvent that Warranty of Reciprocity by production, action, or speech. This leaves us with no option but to participate in voluntary markets under which we limit our productions, actions, and speech to that which consists of productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of cost upon the life, kin, possessions, and interests of others by externality. This explains the entirety of human existence.

    The Need for New Institutions of Calculation

    (the problem of measurement) (the problem of pooling)  

    Ordinary people need elites, and elites need ordinary people

    Ordinary people need elites, and elites need ordinary people unless dis-intermediated by capital. So end disintermediation by capital and you restore the reciprocal dependence of elites upon ordinary people. So in order to prevent elites from defecting from their ordinary people the people must prevent disintermediation their from elites by capital. How is this done? Relatively easily. Especially with full accounting of changes in capital.  

    The Soviet Experiment

    (advantage of the discount on market prices of serf labor at cost of skills and incentives)  

    The Chinese Experiment

    Why No Version of Socialism Is Possible

    [ KEY LESSON: HUMANS SEEK RENTS over productivity. The only way to obtain those rents is indirectly through market gains. And of all the goods you can produce, a one child policy for the unproductive provides the highest returns. Why? Because people CAN act on DIRECT rent seeking, and people CANNOT act on indirect rent seeking (market returns). ] In other words, socialism is the ultimate selfishness. LIST

    1. The investments are undecidable without monetary interests (it’s impossible) so that in the absence of money and rule of law we see discretion.
    2. The investments are minimal because in all organizations, members seek to maximize rents.
    3. Because the incentive to maximize rents is superior to the incentive to invest, corruption evolves instead of production.
    4. Because of all of the above, the general standard of living of the people declines relative to those who practice markets.
    5. Because of the difference in standard of living force must be used to retain the population(defectors) OR force will (in the past at least) be used to prevent invasion by defectors.
    6. Socialists are simply seeking non-market rents. The way to obtain market premiums is to exit the company in favor of a company that pays more.
    7. If you cannot exit the company and obtain a premium, then you are already maximizing your income.
    8. Engineers (employees) that produce outsized returns provide those returns to the entire company, allowing increases in rents by all employees.
    9. Investors require high returns for the simple reason that the vast majority of their investments fail. The portfolio strategy is to lose most, make good returns on a few, and have one windfall. This is also how the movie business, and publishing business work, with outliers paying for all others. (this is why redistribution – exists under capitalism: unpredictability)
    10. Engineers with ideas that produce outsized returns leave the company to produce the product on their own. If they cannot produce it on their own then they means that the value was in the organization not the individual since the value is in organizing and creating investment, production, distribution, and trade.
    11. There have been rare cases where individuals are not compensated (windshield wiper delays) but the vast number of individuals who contribute returns venture on their own – and don’t otherwise, because they in fact cannot produce the product.
    12. As an aside, corporate democracy is absolutely ridiculous. All the evidence illustrates that leadership matters, and as someone who has built some very large consulting companies, specializing the creating consensus in companies, democracy in companies would be as catastrophic as it is in politics, and only lead to the same corruption. Someone DOES know the answer in the company. The primary function of Management Consulting Companies is to survey what everyone in a company knows, to identify which ideas have some potential given the available financial and market resources and then write an argument and develop consensus in the company because of it. Why? Dunning Kruger: everyone in a company (any organization, and in society) VASTLY overstates their knowledge except Generals, CEOs, and Presidents. Any competent CEO or general will say the same thing: I am only doing this job because I can’t find someone who will do it better, or I promised some people I would do it until I succeeded or failed. That’s it.

    I could go on but basically redistribution occurs through success of organizations. The problem is simply the one eugenicists warned us about, and economists acknowledge only behind closed doors: that the central problem for any polity is reducing the size of the unproductive classes to those who have been the victims of accidents, rather than increasing the size of dependent classes until their rents are maximized, and investment and risk are no longer possible on the one hand, and ability to absorb shocks is no longer possible on the other. HUMANS SEEK RENTS. The only way to obtain them is indirectly through market gains. And of all the goods you can produce, a one child policy for the unproductive provides the highest returns. Why? Because people CAN act on DIRECT rent seeking, and people CANNOT act on indirect rent seeking (market returns). This is why market economies succeed in vast improvement of lower class conditions more so than the upper classes (who are subject to constantly forced economic rotation. While the reason socialist economies always fail, and always will fail is attributed to a lack of incentives to produce, and because the creation of incentives for corruption, and because Very few companies last the lifetime of their founders and their children. And as capital is continually less important than rates of invention and innovation, this will continue. Wealth generally survives under three generations. And around 94% of wealth is generated by small and medium business entrepreneurship. And of that wealth a not insignificant portion is research and development that that is later acquired by larger companies with access to public markets. The only thing we can do today is eliminate consumer interest on consumption (houses, cars, appliances), and cut the size of the unproductive classes by eliminating immigration extending work life by providing ‘retirees’ and ‘students’ with part time work, eliminating the obesity problem that limits people’s ability to work, and by culling the underclasses through one child policy. Everything else is suicidal (Europe, Canada, and America), or destructive (brazil, india). PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT MIXED ECONOMIES The problem with current capitalism is that it is possible on the one hand to form unions that can extort from companies under collective bargaining (which is why companies left the USA), and on the other hand, it is possible for (a) investors to prey on companies at the expense of management and staff (this is easily fixed by prohibiting leveraged buyouts, and then legally limiting risk), and (b) we do not help companies adjust to shocks often enough (we should have helped hostess like we helped the auto companies), (c) we do not engage in enough private public ventures (like Tesla, which if successful directly or indirectly, will revolutionize transport by resetting the clock back 100 years), (d) we do not prohibit labor arbitrage (outsourcing production for the purpose of obtaining labor discounts), (e) and we conduct trade policy like everyone else, which is to attempt to restore technological leadership by ensuring that we are not behind (production of LED and other screens, and mass production of chips), (e) and eliminate corporate pensions (they are no longer possible) and centralize them (Singapore model), because they alter the pricing system such that products are decreasingly competitive. (and btw: eliminate government pensions as well.)  

  • Q: 1% earners (regular income) from professional services, differs from 1% (wind

    Q: 1% earners (regular income) from professional services, differs from 1% (windfalls) from entrepreneurship? CEO=Risk, Doctor=Certainty. Balance Sheet vs Income Statement. (Ex. My salary 350k+, trivial compared to the M’s on exit, even w/ the 50K/2yr startup). @mattyglesias

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 18:23:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193232653727797251

    Reply addressees: @karlbykarlsmith

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193194837081759746

    IN REPLY TO:

    @thesubtledoctor

    Much of the 1%, like America’s most unaffordable cities, were created by explicit anti-competitive regulation.

    Even the salaries of CEOs and financial managers owes a lot to the SEC and the consequently few people able to successfully navigate the public markets. https://t.co/J8dMr1CzEX

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193194837081759746

  • And as in ANY MARKET, the velocity of transformation (‘prosperity’) is determine

    And as in ANY MARKET, the velocity of transformation (‘prosperity’) is determined by the degree of expression of various wants in competition with the degree of suppression of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictions, fraud and deceit.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 14:53:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193179869884100613

    Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193179421072613376

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM In other words, we’re not only different,we evolved to specialize in collecting information across reproductive, productive, knowledge, and perception spectrums and cooperating and communicating to produce a market the equilibrium serving all Power, Pareto and Nash distributions.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193179421072613376

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM In other words, we’re not only different,we evolved to specialize in collecting information across reproductive, productive, knowledge, and perception spectrums and cooperating and communicating to produce a market the equilibrium serving all Power, Pareto and Nash distributions.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193179421072613376

  • Or, stated more simply, any increase in income causes all increases in income un

    Or, stated more simply, any increase in income causes all increases in income until income is consumed.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 17:24:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192855483570413569

    Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192852570907316224

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ClownBa73413423 (a) systemic inflation (b) all increases in urban population create inflation in housing prices, which create demand for increase in income, which is cyclically consumed by housing and commercial rental prices, (c) until the income from productivity is exhausted by maintenance.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192852570907316224

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ClownBa73413423 (a) systemic inflation (b) all increases in urban population create inflation in housing prices, which create demand for increase in income, which is cyclically consumed by housing and commercial rental prices, (c) until the income from productivity is exhausted by maintenance.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192852570907316224

  • SECRETS TO SUCCESS Don’t publish reviews unless: 1 – Laudatory for those few boo

    SECRETS TO SUCCESS

    Don’t publish reviews unless:

    1 – Laudatory for those few books that fulfill the author’s promise to the reader – meaning ‘buy this’

    2 – Purely descriptive and without judgement or opinion or recommendation, and if necessary for forgiveness.

    3 – Scathing for failing to fulfill the promise to the reader, for wasting the reader’s time with incompetence, error, self service, or some other nonsense. meaning ‘don’t buy this’.

    SCHOOLS OF CRITICISM

    1 – Roger ebert school of criticism.

    (And any good art student’s) Any work of art must only fulfill the promise it makes to the audience It makes three promises:

    … a) craftsmanship (writing, production, camera, directing, acting, editing, )

    … b) materials ( medium(quality of it), subject, context, characters,)

    … c) content (narrative, plot, novelty, emotional, intellectual, experience),

    2 – Thumper’s school of criticism:

    If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.

    3 – Civic Duty Criticism:

    There are works of incompetence that are a waste of people’s time and money and authors should be punished for producing them.

    Why?

    Authors (artists of all kinds) work and produce.

    Authors (artists of all kinds) compete with one another in a market.

    The competitors produce.

    Critics.

    At any given time there are three to five living critics worth reading. They fall into:

    a) postmodern decivilizing(siskel,most),

    b) audience-contractualist (Roger Ebert / Chris Stuckman),

    c) high-art re-civilizing (David Thomson certainly)

    Right now, I’m not sure there is much film worth criticizing as High Art, or even the equivalent of literature. There is good mythology (horror always is myt), there is spectacle, but there is no art (meaning). And holllywood has built an economic box that prohibits it from making ‘art’. And it’s only going to continue.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 15:17:00 UTC

  • Now, if instead of LEARNING, ADAPTING, EVOLVING, and limiting the growth of your

    Now, if instead of LEARNING, ADAPTING, EVOLVING, and limiting the growth of your unproductive underclasses, and paying those costs yourselves you want to LIE, to hide your genetic, informational, cultural, institutional, civilizational, underdevelopment (inferiority) you harm …

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 14:36:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192813043962527744

    Reply addressees: @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192812375864422400

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei We do not want your love. We do not want your respect. We do not want to rule you. We want to be PROTECTED from bearing the costs of your lack of development unless we are compensated for developing you. And immigration is just invasion that forces us to pay the costs – not you.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192812375864422400

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei We do not want your love. We do not want your respect. We do not want to rule you. We want to be PROTECTED from bearing the costs of your lack of development unless we are compensated for developing you. And immigration is just invasion that forces us to pay the costs – not you.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192812375864422400

  • No you can’t. Try it. Shit talk is shit talk. Then compare it to the TRILLIONS t

    No you can’t. Try it. Shit talk is shit talk. Then compare it to the TRILLIONS that the USA uses and fails to obtain returns on. You want to fix the USA? Reduce inequality? Privatize education with vouchers. Make universities carry student debt. End immigration entirely.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 13:27:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192433469219131393

    Reply addressees: @cashmoneyglock @studentactivism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192432653942718464

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192432653942718464

  • I understand that every single cent he puts to use is INFINITELY more valuable t

    I understand that every single cent he puts to use is INFINITELY more valuable than every cent the USG puts to use. I undrestand that this is true for EVERY billionaire on earth. Govts return even less on every dollar than do charities. Gates specializes in getting returns.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 13:21:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192431884971728896

    Reply addressees: @studentactivism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192431264235696134

    IN REPLY TO:

    @studentactivism

    @curtdoolittle You do understand that his donations to his foundation are nontaxable, right?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192431264235696134