1) He’s gay and British. 2) He’s marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating marx in quantitative redistributive innumeracy; 4) He did not understand the consequences to capital; 5) Nor how people would run with it; 6) Hayek did but he lacked the language (or didn’t use it).
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 17:03:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192125302480277505
Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192118660032278530
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192118660032278530
Leave a Reply