—“We need to set the precedent that if your country dumps a bunch of underclass invaders on ours, we’ll dump something even worse on you…”— Eli Harman
(a) I put that in the constitution.
(b) “if you are exporting bodies you exporting harm, and thereore conducting war”.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 14:28:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008355676190625792
I understand the primacy of violence and law because I understand that there are many men like me, who are quite capable of predation, organizing predation at scale, and enjoying a life of predation – if not for arbitrary reasons for choosing production.
There is a lot of evil in this world and never forget for a moment that any presumption of safety exists only because of a long line of men between you and the hordes.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 14:04:00 UTC
—“We need to set the precedent that if your country dumps a bunch of underclass invaders on ours, we’ll dump something even worse on you…”— Eli Harman
(a) I put that in the constitution.
(b) “if you are exporting bodies you exporting harm, and thereore conducting war”.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 10:28:00 UTC
I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scientific religion. The law says that any religion that is not false, parasitic, predatory, or devolutionary, is a good religion. The problem is you think that religion requires falsehoods, because you have been immersed in an ocean of ‘forgivable, convenient,’ falsehoods. But that’s only because you haven’t researched the religions that aren’t false, and tried to develop a religion that likewise isn’t false. And the reason you must, is that the only means of eliminating bad religions is falsehood, parasitism, predation, and devolution. And if you preserve those falsehoods and ‘bads’ for your own you license the ‘bads’ of others. There is only one route out of the great deceits, of Abrahamic Pilpul and Critique: truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets, and as a consequence, transcendence.
I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scientific religion. The law says that any religion that is not false, parasitic, predatory, or devolutionary, is a good religion. The problem is you think that religion requires falsehoods, because you have been immersed in an ocean of ‘forgivable, convenient,’ falsehoods. But that’s only because you haven’t researched the religions that aren’t false, and tried to develop a religion that likewise isn’t false. And the reason you must, is that the only means of eliminating bad religions is falsehood, parasitism, predation, and devolution. And if you preserve those falsehoods and ‘bads’ for your own you license the ‘bads’ of others. There is only one route out of the great deceits, of Abrahamic Pilpul and Critique: truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets, and as a consequence, transcendence.
I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scientific religion. The law says that any religion that is not false, parasitic, predatory, or devolutionary, is a good religion. The problem is you think that religion requires falsehoods, because you have been immersed in an ocean of ‘forgivable, convenient,’ falsehoods. But that’s only because you haven’t researched the religions that aren’t false, and tried to develop a religion that likewise isn’t false. And the reason you must, is that the only means of eliminating bad religions is falsehood, parasitism, predation, and devolution. And if you preserve those falsehoods and ‘bads’ for your own you license the ‘bads’ of others. There is only one route out of the great deceits, of Abrahamic Pilpul and Critique: truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets, and as a consequence, transcendence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-13 11:34:00 UTC
DOGMATISM ISN’T IN ITSELF A CRITICISM.
Dogmatism isn’t a criticism. One can be dogmatic about the truth, theft, parasitism or predation – and there isn’t any criticism one can levy at that. One can be dogmatic about (a) a stated preference (b) a hypothetical good (c) an arbitrary definition, conclusion, narrative, or theory. The question is only whether one is dogmatic about a truth and theft or the arbitrary and utilitarian.
DOGMA: a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.
Well, sorry, but truth and theft are natural laws just as every other law of nature. It’s not a matter of opinion. The fact that one STATES these laws does not mean they are imposed by authority, or are arbitrary, but that they simply incontrovertibly exist.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-09 13:39:00 UTC
We are Cain (Agriculture and Metalwork) and They are Able (Pastoralists and Parasites). The battle of the Indo European Conquest Continues.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-07 19:46:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1004811897101832192
We are Cain (Agriculture and Metalwork) and They are Able (Pastoralists and Parasites). The battle of the Indo European Conquest Continues.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-07 15:46:00 UTC
—“Do lions and hyenas think of love, markets or hate? no. but that does not stop them from competing for and defending territory.”— Neil A. Bucklew
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-06 19:38:00 UTC