Theme: Predation

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. HUMANITY FILLS EVERY NICHE OF OPPORTUNITY – I

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    HUMANITY FILLS EVERY NICHE OF OPPORTUNITY – INCLUDING THE CRIMINAL

    The Roma at one end of the spectrum, using begging and theft, and the They fill middle of the spectrum using rent seeking, and the end of the spectrum (predation) is occupied by last of the pastoralists to adopt monotheism using outright predation. I mean HUMANITY FILLS EVERY AVAILABLE NICHE of opportunity for exploiting the existing world, and only the westerners persist by preventing exploitation of all those niches.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 16:46:17 UTC

  • HUMANITY FILLS EVERY NICHE OF OPPORTUNITY – INCLUDING THE CRIMINAL The Roma at o

    HUMANITY FILLS EVERY NICHE OF OPPORTUNITY – INCLUDING THE CRIMINAL

    The Roma at one end of the spectrum, using begging and theft, and the They fill middle of the spectrum using rent seeking, and the end of the spectrum (predation) is occupied by last of the pastoralists to adopt monotheism using outright predation. I mean HUMANITY FILLS EVERY AVAILABLE NICHE of opportunity for exploiting the existing world, and only the westerners persist by preventing exploitation of all those niches.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 12:46:00 UTC

  • Their Strategy

    I mean, if you’re articulate, conniving, but not creative, and unburdened with moral intuition, then it’s deterministic that you will specialize in parasitism by false promise or moral hazard – and it’s rather obvious that you would develop a group evolutionary strategy that takes advantage of your ability to create exception. Take your average woman’s intuition and means of competition by gossip and undue compliment, remove all fear, and that’s what you get. Reversal of dimorphism seems to have been an effective strategy.

  • Their Strategy

    I mean, if you’re articulate, conniving, but not creative, and unburdened with moral intuition, then it’s deterministic that you will specialize in parasitism by false promise or moral hazard – and it’s rather obvious that you would develop a group evolutionary strategy that takes advantage of your ability to create exception. Take your average woman’s intuition and means of competition by gossip and undue compliment, remove all fear, and that’s what you get. Reversal of dimorphism seems to have been an effective strategy.

  • I mean, if you’re articulate, conniving, but not creative, and unburdened with m

    I mean, if you’re articulate, conniving, but not creative, and unburdened with moral intuition, then it’s deterministic that you will specialize in parasitism by false promise or moral hazard – and it’s rather obvious that you would develop a group evolutionary strategy that takes advantage of your ability to create exception. Take your average woman’s intuition and means of competition by gossip and undue compliment, remove all fear, and that’s what you get. Reversal of dimorphism seems to have been an effective strategy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 17:06:00 UTC

  • There Is No “We”

    There is no “WE”. There is us and ours, and you and yours, and they and theirs, and cooperation with you or they, under your or their parasitism, is no longer preferable to separation, war, or even extermination. It is a purely empirical question. Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Under certain conditions cooperation is profitable – when it is not parasitic. Under other conditions predation is preferable to parasitism. The only question I have is whether separation, enslavement, or destruction is preferable. That is a purely empirical question. The subject of morality is a condition of cooperation outside of cooperation all questions are amoral. Under parasitism only predation is rational. It is a purely empirical question.

  • There Is No “We”

    There is no “WE”. There is us and ours, and you and yours, and they and theirs, and cooperation with you or they, under your or their parasitism, is no longer preferable to separation, war, or even extermination. It is a purely empirical question. Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Under certain conditions cooperation is profitable – when it is not parasitic. Under other conditions predation is preferable to parasitism. The only question I have is whether separation, enslavement, or destruction is preferable. That is a purely empirical question. The subject of morality is a condition of cooperation outside of cooperation all questions are amoral. Under parasitism only predation is rational. It is a purely empirical question.

  • Retweeted Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit): “Many foreign shopkeepers packed up shop e

    Retweeted Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit):

    “Many foreign shopkeepers packed up shop early on Sunday out of fear of being attacked.” By this is meant Indian and Chinese shopkeepers, who are a favorite target for black mobs in that country.

    Won’t be long before total collapse. https://t.co/Ff82PFRdqd


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 20:11:00 UTC

  • THERE IS NO “WE” There is no “WE”. There is us and ours, and you and yours, and

    THERE IS NO “WE”

    There is no “WE”. There is us and ours, and you and yours, and they and theirs, and cooperation with you or they, under your or their parasitism, is no longer preferable to separation, war, or even extermination. It is a purely empirical question.

    Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Under certain conditions cooperation is profitable – when it is not parasitic. Under other conditions predation is preferable to parasitism. The only question I have is whether separation, enslavement, or destruction is preferable. That is a purely empirical question.

    The subject of morality is a condition of cooperation outside of cooperation all questions are amoral. Under parasitism only predation is rational. It is a purely empirical question.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 16:50:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.)

    SOME RADICAL LEFTIST ASKED ME HOW PROPERTARIANISM WOULD JUDGE HITLER’S GERMANY’S RELOCATION POLICY

    It was a dishonest attempt to bait hate speech. I don’t do hate speech. Ever. I do Science and Natural Law.

    Here is the Answer:

    (a) That high trust is nearly exclusive to the germanic and Japanese peoples, and is their civilization’s competitive advantage.
    (b) That outside of scientific researchers (scientists) non kin shouldn’t cohabitate in the fist place, because it reduces trust, and creates those exact conditions of conflict. (The upper intellectual classes are more autistic and less dependent upon collective for information, and the lower classes the opposite).
    (c) That peoples that specialize in rent seeking and profiting from moral hazard in particular shouldn’t be hosted (any more than those dependent upon begging and thievery) because it leads to prosecution, persecution, and at times, extermination – as well as destroying trust and raising costs of policing the commons.
    (d) That peoples who practice separatism of any kind shouldn’t be tolerated by host societies for those same reasons.
    (e) That this process of separation, if pursued, should be legislated with a multi-year timeline, later prosecuted for non-compliance, and then subject to Hoppe’s “Forcible Removal”.
    (f) That the original relocation model, taken from the Soviet Relocations, had been successful there, and truthfully, throughout all human history.
    (g) That the combination of relocation (forcible removal) and a nearly impossible war was unmanageable. And that they could not fund both. Had they not been pressured by Russia into war, they would have succeeded.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 12:36:02 UTC